Aquifer vulnerability using recharge, depth to groundwater, soil type and slope to classify the vadose zone (Molototsi and Middle Letaba quaternary catchments, Limpopo Province, South Africa)
- 293 Downloads
The aquifer vulnerability of the Molototsi (B81G) and Middle Letaba (B82D) quaternary catchments was assessed to determine the influence of the vadose zone on the groundwater regime. The aquifer vulnerability was assessed by developing a new method, which evaluates the vadose zone as a pathway for pollutants using the following four parameters: recharge, depth to water table, soil type (saturated vertical hydraulic conductivity) and slope (RDSS). Recharge was estimated using the chloride mass balance method, and the depth to the water table was measured in the field using dipmeter. The seepage behaviour (soil type) was determined as hydraulic conductivity from in situ infiltration and percolation testing (SABS 0252-2:1993 and double ring infiltrometer). The slopes were determined with the digital elevation method using ArcGIS software. The four parameters were overlaid using weighted sum, weighted overlay and raster calculator to produce the vulnerability map. Different weightings were attributed in the methods and the best selected. The results obtained indicated high vulnerability on the lower and upper parts of both catchments. The benefits of the method described are (a) the easy quantification of the parameters through fairly simple methods and (b) the exclusion of arbitrary index values.
KeywordsVadose zone Aquifer vulnerability Molototsi Middle Letaba
The authors wish to thank the National Research Foundation (NRF) for co-funding this research. This work forms part of the project funded by the Water Research Commission (WRC) of South Africa (Report No. KV 243/10).
- Bolstad P (2005) Basic spatial analysis. In: GIS fundamentals: a first text on geographic information systems, 2nd edn. White Bear Lake, pp 324–355Google Scholar
- Department of Environmental Affairs and Tourism (DEAT) (2009) Environmental management framework for the Olifants and Letaba River catchment areas: draft report on the status quo, opportunities, constraints and the desired state, Pretoria, South Africa, p 12Google Scholar
- Department of Environmental Protection (2006) Pennsylvania stormwater best management practices manual, Bureau of Watershed Management, 30(20), pp 437–443Google Scholar
- Department of Water Affairs and Forestry (DWAF) (2004) Internal strategic perspective: Luvuvhu/Letaba water management area: prepared by GobaMoahloli Keeve Steyn (Pty) Ltd in association with Tlou and Matji, Golder Associates Africa and BKS on behalf of the Directorate: National Water Resource Planning. Department of Water Affairs and Forestry (South Africa) Report Number PWMA 02/000/00/0304, pp 1–18Google Scholar
- Dippenaar MA, Van Rooy JL, Freese R, Makonto OT (2010) Preliminary vadose zone classification methodology (Molototsi and middle Letaba quaternary catchments), Water Research Commission. Report KV 243/10, PretoriaGoogle Scholar
- Helmschrot J (1999) Applications of remote sensing data for distributed hydrological modelling of large scale afforested areas in the Northern East Cape Province, South Africa. Session: research and management of ecosystems and natural resources including forests, Germany, pp 1–8Google Scholar
- Jenn F, Knödel K, Liese M, Voigt H (2007) Precipitation. In: Knödel K, Lange G, Voigt HJ (eds) Environmental geology: handbook of methods and case studies. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 652–653Google Scholar
- Poehls DJ, Smith GJ (2009) Encyclopedic dictionary of hydrogeology, 1st edn. London, p 358Google Scholar
- South African National Standards (SANS) (1993) Code of practice: water supply and drainage for buildings. Part 2: drainage installations for buildings. SABS 10252-2:1993Google Scholar
- DWAF, Van Vuuren AJ, Jordaan H, Van Der Walt E, Vanjaarveld S (2003) Luvuvhu and Letaba water management area: water resource situation assessment, Department of Water Affairs and Forestry (South Africa), Report Number P/02000/00/0101, pp 2–3Google Scholar
- Witthüser KT, Holland M, Rossouw TG, Rambau E, Bumby AJ, Petzer KJ, Dennis I, Beekman H, van Rooy JL, Dippenaar M, de Wit M (2011) Determining sustainable yields of potential productive well fields in the basement aquifers of the Limpopo Province with special emphasis on the (WMA) and Luvuvhu/Letaba (WMA 2) water management areas. Water Research Commission (South Africa) Project Number K5/1693/1, p 5Google Scholar