Advertisement

Environmental Earth Sciences

, Volume 71, Issue 9, pp 4247–4259 | Cite as

Water absorption process effect on strength of Ayazini tuff, such as the uniaxial compressive strength (UCS), flexural strength and freeze and thaw effect

  • Mustafa Yavuz ÇelikEmail author
  • Huseyin Akbulut
  • Ayşe Ergül
Original Article

Abstract

Tuffs have been used as a construction material possibly since ancient times. In Afyonkarahisar, Turkey, there are numerous buildings constructed by tuff. Tuff has been a local construction material, during the Roman, Seljuk and Ottoman periods. Even though tuffs have relatively low durability and low strength values compared to marble, etc., they have survived with no major deterioration failures on many historical buildings. It has also been preferred because of its high porous texture, lightweight and easy shaping and process properties in the building sector. Naturally, it would be easily affected by water and humidity because of its porous structure. However, having this kind of structure leads to poor durability properties due to keeping water in it. The main objective of this study was to evaluate the physical and mechanical properties of the tuff quarried from the region and possible water effect, which may lead to degradation of its strength and durability of the material, thereby shortening the life span of the building structure used. Samples, which were tested after exposing to water and the freeze and thaw effects, were measured at a certain time. In this study, uniaxial compressive strength and flexural strength tests were conducted on test samples. The test results indicate that water may deteriorate the tuff’s strength properties and durability of the materials in due time.

Keywords

Ayazini tuff Durability Freeze and thaw strength Water absorption 

References

  1. ASTM Standard C 170 (2007) Compressive strength test. Annual Book of ASTM Standards, vol 4.07. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PAGoogle Scholar
  2. ASTM Standard C 241 (2007) Abrasion resistance test. Annual Book of ASTM Standards, vol 4.07. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PAGoogle Scholar
  3. ASTM Standard C 616 (2007) Dimension stone testing values.Annual Book of ASTM Standards, vol 4.07. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PAGoogle Scholar
  4. ASTM Standard C 880 (2007) Flexural strength test. Annual Book of ASTM Standards, vol 4.07. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PAGoogle Scholar
  5. ASTM Standard C 97 (2007) Absorption test. Annual Book of ASTM Standards, vol 4.07. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PAGoogle Scholar
  6. Bell FG (1980) Engineering Geology and Geotechnics. Butter-worth and Co.Ltd, London, pp 497–506Google Scholar
  7. Besang C, Eckhardt FJ, Harre W, Kreuzer H, Muller P (1997) Radiometrische altersbestimmungen an Neogenen eruptivgesteinen ser Turkei. Geol Jb B 25:3–36Google Scholar
  8. Bortz SA, Wonneberger B, Kaskel B (1991) Freeze-thaw durability of cast stone. Concr Int 13(11):32–37 Google Scholar
  9. Bortz S, Stecich J, Wonneberger B, Chin I (1993) Accelerated weathering in building stone. In: the 34th symposium on rock mechanics. Madison, WisconsinGoogle Scholar
  10. Çelik MY, Sabah E (2002) The geological and technical characterizations of Ömer—Gecek geothermal area and environmental impact assessment of geothermal heating system in Afyon Turkey. Environ Geol 41(48):942–953Google Scholar
  11. Çevikbaş A, Ercan T, Metin S (1988) Geology and regional distribution of neogene volcanics between Afyon–Şuhut. METU (Middle East Technical University). J Pure Appl Sci 21(1–3):479–499Google Scholar
  12. Chen TC, Yeung MR, Mori N (2004) Effect of water saturation on deterioration of welded tuff due to freeze–thaw action. Cold Reg Sci Technol 38:127–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dobson P, Nakagawa S (2005) Summary of rock-property measurements for Hong Kong tuff samples. LBNL, Report, p 7 (LBNL-58878)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Emir E, Konuk A, Daloğlu G (2011) Strength enhancement of Eskisehir tuff ashlars in Turkey. Constr Build Mater 25(7):3014–3019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Entwisle DC, Hobbs PRN, Jones LD, Gunn D, Raines MG (2005) The relationships between effective porosity, uniaxial compressive strength and sonic velocity of intact Borrowdale volcanic group core samples from Sellafield. Geotech Geol Eng 23:793–809CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ergül A (2009) Investigation of the effect on phycico-mechanic characteristics of the water content dependent upon porosity in the tuffs used as a building stone in Afyonkarahisar. Dissertation, University of Afyon Kocatepe (in Turkish)Google Scholar
  17. Erguler ZA (2009) Field-based experimental determination of the weathering rates of the Cappadocian tuffs. Eng Geol 105:186–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Görgülü K, Durutürk YS, Demirci A, Poyraz B (2008) Influences of uniaxial stress and moisture content on the thermal conductivity of rocks. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 45(8):1439–1445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Guruprasad B, Ragupathy A, Badrinarayanan TS, Rajkumar KB (2012) The stress impact on mechanical properties of rocks in hydro fracturing technique. IJEST 4(2):571–580Google Scholar
  20. Hawkins AB, McConnell BJ (1992) Sensitivity of sandstone strength and deformability to changes in moisture content. Q J Eng Geol Hydroge 25:115–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Heiken G (2006) Tuffs-their properties, uses, hydrology, and resources. In: Heiken G (ed) Geological Society of America, Special paper 408Google Scholar
  22. Huang S, Xia K, Yan F, Feng XT (2010) An experimental study of the rate dependence of tensile strength softening of Longyou sandstone. Rock Mech Rock Eng 43(6):677–683CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Keller J, Villari L (1972) Rhyolitic ignimbrites in the region of. Afyon (Central Anatolia). Bull Volcan 36(4):342–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Koralay T, Özkul M, Kumsar H, Celik SB, Pektas K (2011) The effect of welding degree on geotechnical properties of an ignimbrite flow unit: the Bitlis castle case (Eastern Turkey). Environ Earth Sci 64:869–881CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Larsen TD, Cady PD (1969) Identification of frost susceptible particles in concrete aggregates, National Cooperative Research Program. Highway Research Board Google Scholar
  26. Le Bas MJ, Streckeisen AL (1991) The IUGS systematics of igneous rocks. J Geol Soc London 148:825–833CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Le Bas MJ, Le Maitre RW, Woolley AR (1992) The construction of the total alkali–silica chemical classification of volcanic rocks. Miner Petrol 46:1–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Li D, Wong LNY, Liu G, Zhang XP (2012) Influence of water content and anisotropy on the strength and deformability of low porosity meta-sedimentary rocks under triaxial compression. Eng Geol 126:46–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. López-Doncel R, Wedekind W, Dohrmann R, Siegesmund S (2012) Moisture expansion associated to secondary porosity: an example of the Loseros Tuff of Guanajuato, Mexico. Environ Earth Sci. doi: 10.1007/s12665-012-1781-1 Google Scholar
  30. Masuda K (2001) Effects of water on rock strength in a brittle regime. J Struct Geol 23:1653–1657CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Metin S, Genç Ş, Bulut V (1987) Afyon ve dolayının jeolojisi. MTA Rapor No: 8103 Ankara (in Turkish)Google Scholar
  32. Mohamad ET, Isa MFM, Amin MFM, Komoo I, Gofar N, Saad R (2011) Effect of moisture content on the strength of various weathering grades of granite. Electron J Geotech Eng 16(H):863–886Google Scholar
  33. Öktü G, Kara İ, Önder İ (1997) Afyon ilinde yer alan Ömer—Gecek—Uyuz Hamamı ve Gazlıgöl jeotermal enerji sahalarının detay etüdü. M.T.A. Enerji Hammadde Etüt ve Arama Dairesi, Ankara (in Turkish)Google Scholar
  34. Öner F, Türkmen S, Özbek A, Karakaya T (2006) Engineering properties of Hinis ignimbrites (Erzurum, Turkey) and their usability as a building stone. Environ Geol 50:275–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Pola A, Crosta GB, Fusi N, Barberini V, Norini G, Pola Villasenor A (2012) Influence of alteration on physical properties of volcanic rocks. Tectonophysics 566–567:67–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rossana B, Paola M (2012) The effect of water on the strength of building stones. Am J Environ Sci 8(2):158–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ruedrich J, Bartelsen T, Dohrmann R, Siegesmund S (2011) Moisture expansion as a deterioration factor for sandstone used in buildings. Environ Earth Sci 63:1545–1564CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Shukla R, Ranjith PG, Choi SK, Haque A, Yellishetty M, Hong L (2013) Mechanical behaviour of reservoir rock under brine saturation. Rock Mech Rock Eng 46:83–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sims I (1991) Quality and durability of stone for construction. Q J Eng Geol 24:67–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Steindlberger E (2004) Volcanic tuffs from Hesse (Germany) and their weathering behaviour. Environ Geol 46:378–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sun J, Hu YY (1997) Time-dependent effects on the tensile strength of saturated granite at Three Gorges Project in China. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 34(2):323–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Talesnick M, Shehadeh S (2007) The effect of water content on the mechanical response of a high-porosity chalk. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 44(4):584–600CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Topal T, Doyuran V (1997) Engineering geological properties and durability assessment of the Cappadocian tuff. Eng Geol 47(1–2):175–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Topal T, Doyuran V (1998) Analyses of deterioration of the Cappadocian tuff, Turkey. Environ Geol 34(1):5–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Topal T, Sözmen B (2003) Deterioration mechanisms of tuffs in Midas monument. Eng Geol 68(2003):201–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Torok Á, Vásárhelyi B (2010) The influence of fabric and water content on selected rock mechanical parameters of travertine, examples from Hungary. Eng Geol 115:237–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Torok A, Forgo LZ, Vogt T, Lobens S, Siegesmund S, Weiss T (2007) The influence of lithology and pore-size distribution on the durability of acid volcanic tuffs, Hungary. In: Prikryl R, Smith BJ (eds) Building stone decay: from diagnosis to conservation. J Geol Soc London 271(1):251–260Google Scholar
  48. TS 10835 (1993) Andesite, used as building stone. Turkish Standards Institution, Ankara (in Turkish)Google Scholar
  49. TS 699 (2002) Methods of testing for natural building stones. Turkish Standards Institution, Ankara (in Turkish)Google Scholar
  50. Tuğrul A (2004) The effect of weathering on pore geometry and compressive strength of selected rock types from Turkey. Eng Geol 75:215–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Türkdönmez O, Bozcu M (2012) The geological, petrographical and engineering properties of rhyolitic tuffs (Çan Stone) in Çan-Etili area (Çanakkale), NW Turkey: their usage as building and covering stones. Open J Geol 2(1):25–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Valès F, Nguyen Minh D, Gharbi H, Rejeb A (2004) Experimental study of the influence of the degree of saturation on physical and mechanical properties in Tournemire argilite (France). Appl Clay Sci 26:197–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Vasarhelyi B (2003) Some observations regarding the strength and deformability of sandstones in dry and saturated condition. Bull Eng Geol Environ 62:245–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Vasarhelyi B (2005) Statistical analysis of the influence of water content on the strength of the Miocene limestone. Rock Mech Rock Eng 38(1):697670–697674CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Vasarhelyi B, Van P (2006) Influence of water content on the strength of rock. Eng Geol 84:70–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Wedekind W, López-Doncel R, Dohrmann R, Kocher M, Siegesmund S (2012) Weathering of volcanic tuff rocks caused by moisture expansion. Environ Earth Sci. doi: 10.1007/s12665-012-2158-1 Google Scholar
  57. Yasar E, Tolgay A, Teymen A (2009) Industrial usage of Nevsehir-Kayseri (Turkey) tuff stone. World Appl Sci J 7(3):271–284Google Scholar
  58. Yavuz AB (2012) Durability assessment of the Alaçatı tuff (Izmir) in western Turkey. Environ Earth Sci 67:1909–1925CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Yilmaz I (2010) Influence of water content on the strength and deformability of gypsum. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 47(2):342–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mustafa Yavuz Çelik
    • 1
    Email author
  • Huseyin Akbulut
    • 2
  • Ayşe Ergül
    • 3
  1. 1.Afyon Vocational SchoolAfyon Kocatepe UniversityAfyonkarahisarTurkey
  2. 2.Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of EngineeringAfyon Kocatepe UniversityAfyonkarahisarTurkey
  3. 3.AnkaraTurkey

Personalised recommendations