Advertisement

Environmental Earth Sciences

, Volume 71, Issue 7, pp 3109–3117 | Cite as

Analysis of social vulnerability to hazards in China

  • Yi LixinEmail author
  • Zhang Xi
  • Ge Lingling
  • Zhao Dong
Original Article

Abstract

To improve natural disaster management, it is important to recognize the variability of the vulnerable populations exposed to hazards and to develop location-based emergency plans accordingly. This paper presents a mathematical model to establish a model of social vulnerability index (SoVI), which includes 12 social variables, and the regional social vulnerability to natural hazards was formulated by them. Taking a city as statistical unit, the variability of vulnerability to natural hazards was explored among the 323 cities based on the SoVI. The results indicate that vulnerability is a location-based regional phenomenon, with the most vulnerable cities being located in the southwest of China and the eastern areas being generally less vulnerable. The results will be helpful for policy makers to formulate disaster management plans, which can be beneficial for people in more vulnerable areas who are responding to, coping with, and recovering from natural disasters.

Keywords

Social vulnerability Natural hazards Social vulnerability index Vulnerable city 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was funded by Asian Studies Center of Nankai University.

References

  1. Adger WN, Brooks N, Bentham G et al (2004) New indicators of vulnerability and adaptive capacity. In: Tyndall centre for climate change research technical report 7, University of East Anglia, NorwichGoogle Scholar
  2. Blaikie P, Brookfield H (1987) Land degradation and society. Metheun & Company, Ltd., New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. Blaikie P, Cannon T, Davis I et al (1994) At risk: natural hazards, people’s vulnerability, and disasters. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. Borden KA, Schmidtlein MC, Emrich CT et al (2007) Vulnerability of U.S. Cities to Environmental Hazards. J Homel Secur Emerg Manag 4(2):(Online)1547–7355. doi: 10.2202/1547-7355.1279
  5. Chambers R (1989) Editorial introduction: vulnerability, coping and policy. IDS Bull 20:1–7. doi: 10.1111/j.1759-5436.1989.mp20002001.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chang CY, Hsiao HC (2007) Establishing hazards-of-place model of vulnerability—a case of flood in the Shijhih City Taiwan. In: 2nd international conference on urban disaster reduction reduction, TaiwanGoogle Scholar
  7. Cutter LS, Emrich CT (2006) Moral hazard, social catastrophe: the changing face of vulnerability along the hurricane coasts. Ann Am Acad 604:102–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cutter SL, Mitchell JT, Scott MS (1997) Handbook for conducting a GIS-based hazards assessment at the county level. South Carolina Emergency Preparedness Division, South CarolinaGoogle Scholar
  9. Cutter SL, Mitchell JT, Scott MS (2000) Revealing the vulnerability of people and places: a case study of georgetown county, South Carolina. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 90(4):713–737CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cutter SL, Boruff BJ, Shirley WL (2003) Social vulnerability to environmental hazards. Soc Sci Quart 84(2):242–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dahl AL (1991) Island directory. UNEP regional seas directories and bibliographies No.35, UNEP, NairobiGoogle Scholar
  12. Dwyer A, Zoppou C, Nielsen O et al (2004) Quantifying social vulnerability: a methodology for identifying those at risk to natural hazards. Geoscience Australia Record 2004/14Google Scholar
  13. ECLAC (2003) A methodological framework for a social vulnerability index in the caribbean subregion. In: Document presented at the ad hoc expert group meeting on a methodological approach for a social vulnerability index for small Island developing statesGoogle Scholar
  14. Hewitt K (1997) Regions of risk: a geographical introduction to disaster. Longman, EssexGoogle Scholar
  15. King D, MacGregor C (2000) Using social indicators to measure community vulnerability to natural hazards. Aust J Emerg Manag 15(3):52–57Google Scholar
  16. Masozera M, Bailey M, Kerchner C (2007) Distribution of impacts of natural disasters across income groups: a case study of New Orleans. Ecol Econ 63:299–306. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.06.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. McCarthy JJ, Canziani OF, Leary NA et al (2001) Climate change 2001: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  18. Mileti D (1999) Disasters by design: a reassessment of natural hazards in the United States. National Academies Press, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  19. Morrow BH (1999) Identifying and mapping community vulnerability. Disasters 23(1):1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. National Disaster Mitigation Center (2010) The overview of natural disaster in China, vol 1. Disaster reduction in China, pp 8–9 (in China)Google Scholar
  21. OCHA (2010) Chile: Earthquake situation report #9. United Nations office for the coordination of humanitarian affairs partnership for humanity Web. http://reliefweb.int/sites/reliefweb.int/files/resources/3C1035B690C8ED8B492576F5008162A7-Full_Report.pdf
  22. Renois C (2010) Haiti death toll tops 200 000 as aid anger mounts. Relief Web. http://reliefweb.int/report/haiti/haiti-death-toll-tops-200%C2%A0000-aid-anger-mounts
  23. Rygel L, O’Sullivan D, Yarnal B (2006) A method for constructing a social vulnerability index: an application to hurricane storm surges in a developed country. Mitig Adapt Strat Glob Change 11:741–764CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Saaty TL (1990) How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process. Eur J Oper Res 48(1):9–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Schmidtlein MC, Shafer JM, Berry M et al (2011) Modeled earthquake losses and social vulnerability in Charleston, South Carolina. Appl Geograp 31(1):269–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Tapsell S, McCarthy S, Faulkner H et al (2010) Social vulnerability to natural hazards. CapHaz-Net consortium, Middlesex University, UKGoogle Scholar
  27. Blaikie P (1985) The political economy of social erosion in developing countries. Longman, LondonGoogle Scholar
  28. UN/ISDR (2004) Implementation of the International Strategy for Disaster Reduction, A/59/228 Geneva. The United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction Web. http://www.unisdr.org/we/inform/resolutions-reports
  29. Weichselgartner J (2001) Disaster mitigation: the concept of vulnerability revisited. Disaster Preven Manag 10(2):85–95. doi: 10.1108/09653560110388609 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Wisner B, Blaikie P, Cannon T et al (2005) At risk: natural hazard, people’s vulnerability and disasters, 2nd edn. Taylor & Francis e-Library Press, UKGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The College of Environmental Science and EngineeringNankai UniversityTianjinChina

Personalised recommendations