Advertisement

Environmental Earth Sciences

, Volume 71, Issue 7, pp 3007–3023 | Cite as

Robust landslide susceptibility analysis by combination of frequency ratio, heuristic GIS-methods and ground truth evaluation for a mountainous study area with poor data availability in the Three Gorges Reservoir area, PR China

  • Markus SchleierEmail author
  • Renneng Bi
  • Joachim Rohn
  • Dominik Ehret
  • Wei Xiang
Original Article

Abstract

Increasing number of geohazards, like mass movements, is one of the main environmental impacts following the impoundment of the Yangtze River and its tributaries due to the inventory of the Three Gorges Dam hydroelectric power plant. Although many cities and settlements are endangered, no detailed hazard mapping is possible because of the huge size of the affected area. Due to strongly limited data availability, a robust landslide susceptibility model was established exemplarily for the Xiangxi catchment as one of the main tributaries. The analyses were limited to translational, rotational and combined landslides in soft rock sediments because these represent the main types of mass movement activity in this area. The qualitative landslide susceptibility analysis was carried out by a combination of frequency ratio analyses and a heuristic iterative index-based method using a Geographical Information System. As conditioning factors, the parameters lithology, slope angle, -aspect, -curvature, drainage buffer distance and land use were applied. To improve the objectivity of the index-based method, the results of frequency ratio analyses were taken into consideration to assess the importance of each factor. Model verification and evaluation by ground truth enable to improve the model by iterative calculations and to identify the best performance model. Results indicate that 89 % of all known landslides are located within areas showing high susceptibility according to the best performance model. The study demonstrates that a rather simple but robust model achieves good results and is applicable for regional landslide susceptibility analyses in mountainous areas with poor data availability.

Keywords

Landslide susceptibility Geographical Information System (GIS) Frequency ratio analysis Ground truth Performance evaluation Three Gorges Reservoir 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The studies were carried out as a part of the interdisciplinary “YANGTE-Project” which was supported by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF); therefore, we thank the great financial support that enabled this project. Furthermore, we want to thank all the students from University Erlangen-Nuremberg, who carried out a main part of field mapping, the research group of Prof. Xiang Wei from China University of Geosciences (Wuhan) for their support during field work in China as well as all of our project partners for collaboration throughout the last years.

References

  1. Ayalew L, Yamagishi H, Marui H, Kanno T (2005) Landslides in Sado Island of Japan: part II. GIS-based susceptibility mapping with comparisons of results from two methods and verifications. Eng Geol 81(4):432–445. doi: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2005.08.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baxter RM (1977) Environmental effects of dams and impoundments. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 8:255–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bi R, Ehret D, Xiang W, Rohn J, Schleier M, Jiang J (2012) Landslide reliability analysis based on transfer coefficient method: a case study from Three Gorges Reservoir. J Earth Sci 23(2):187–198. doi: 10.1007/s12583-012-0244-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bishop MP, James LA, Shroder JF Jr, Walsh SJ (2012) Geospatial technologies and digital geomorphological mapping: concepts, issues and research. Geomorphology 137(1):5–26. doi: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2011.06.027 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carrara A, Crosta G, Frattini P (2008) Comparing models of debris-flow susceptibility in the alpine environment. Geomorphology 94(3–4):353–378. doi: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2006.10.033 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Clerici A, Perego S, Tellini C, Vescovi P (2006) A GIS-based automated procedure for landslide susceptibility mapping by the Conditional Analysis method: the Baganza valley case study (Italian Northern Apennines). Environ Geol 50(7):941–961. doi: 10.1007/s00254-006-0264-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Donati L, Turrini MC (2002) An objective method to rank the importance of the factors predisposing to landslides with the GIS methodology: application to an area of the Apennines (Valnerina; Perugia, Italy). Eng Geol 63:277–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ehret D, Rohn J, Xiang W, Yan S (2008) Influence of large water level changes on slope stability and reactivation of mass movements in the Three Gorges Reservoir, PR China. In: Chigara M, Okada Y, Fujisawa K et al (eds) Management of landslide hazard in the Asia-Pacific Region, Sendai, Japan, 2008. The Japan Landslide Society, Japan, pp 297–304Google Scholar
  9. Ehret D, Rohn J, Dumperth C, Eckstein S, Ernstberger S, Otte K, Rudolph R, Wiedenmann J, Xiang W, Bi R (2010) Frequency ratio analysis of mass movements in the Xiangxi catchment, Three Gorges Reservoir area, China. J Earth Sci 21(6):824–834. doi: 10.1007/s12583-010-0134-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ercanoglu M, Temiz FA (2011) Application of logistic regression and fuzzy operators to landslide susceptibility assessment in Azdavay (Kastamonu, Turkey). Environ Earth Sci 64(4):949–964. doi: 10.1007/s12665-011-0912-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ermini L, Catani F, Casagli N (2005) Artificial neural networks applied to landslide susceptibility assessment. Geomorphology 66:327–343. doi: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2004.09.025 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Frattini P, Crosta G, Carrara A (2010) Techniques for evaluating the performance of landslide susceptibility models. Eng Geol 111(1–4):62–72. doi: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2009.12.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. He K, Li X, Yan X, Guo D (2008) The landslides in the Three Gorges Reservoir Region, China and the effects of water storage and rain on their stability. Environ Geol 55(1):55–63. doi: 10.1007/s00254-007-0964-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Intarawichian N, Dasananda S (2011) Frequency ratio model based landslide susceptibility mapping in lower Mae Chaem watershed, Northern Thailand. Environ Earth Sci 64(8):2271–2285. doi: 10.1007/s12665-011-1055-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jiang J, Ehret D, Xiang W, Rohn J, Huang L, Yan S, Bi R (2011) Numerical simulation of Qiaotou Landslide deformation caused by drawdown of the Three Gorges Reservoir, China. Environ Earth Sci 62(2):411–419. doi: 10.1007/s12665-010-0536-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kallen D, Xiang W, Ehret D, Rohn J (2006) Landslides at Qingjiang river in the downstream area of Shuibuya dam site, China. J China Univ Geosci 17(2):158–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lee S, Sambath T (2006) Landslide susceptibility mapping in the Damrei Romel area, Cambodia using frequency ratio and logistic regression models. Environ Geol 50(6):847–855. doi: 10.1007/s00254-006-0256-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lee MJ, Choi JW, Oh HJ, Won JS, Park I, Lee S (2012) Ensemble-based landslide susceptibility maps in Jinbu area, Korea. Environ Earth Sci 67(1):23–37. doi: 10.1007/s12665-011-1477-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mancini F, Ceppi C, Ritrovato G (2010) GIS and statistical analysis for landslide susceptibility mapping in the Daunia area, Italy. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 10(9):1851–1864. doi: 10.5194/nhess-10-1851-2010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Metternicht G, Hurni L, Gogu R (2005) Remote sensing of landslides: an analysis of the potential contribution to geo-spatial systems for hazard assessment in mountainous environments. Remote Sens Environ 98(2–3):284–303. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2005.08.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Park S, Choi C, Kim B, Kim J (2013) Landslide susceptibility mapping using frequency ratio, analytic hierarchy process, logistic regression, and artificial neural network methods at the Inje area, Korea. Environ Earth Sci 68(5):1443–1464. doi: 10.1007/s12665-012-1842-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Regmi NR, Giardino JR, Vitek JD (2010) Assessing susceptibility to landslides: using models to understand observed changes in slopes. Geomorphology 122(1–2):25–38. doi: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2010.05.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Reis S, Yalcin A, Atasoy M, Nisanci R, Bayrak T, Erduran M, Sancar C, Ekercin S (2012) Remote sensing and GIS-based landslide susceptibility mapping using frequency ratio and analytical hierarchy methods in Rize province (NE Turkey). Environ Earth Sci 66(7):2063–2073. doi: 10.1007/s12665-011-1432-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ruff M, Czurda K (2008) Landslide susceptibility analysis with a heuristic approach in the Eastern Alps (Vorarlberg, Austria). Geomorphology 94(3–4):314–324. doi: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2006.10.032 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ruff M, Rohn J (2008) Susceptibility analysis for slides and rockfall: an example from the Northern Calcareous Alps (Vorarlberg, Austria). Environ Geol 55(2):441–452. doi: 10.1007/s00254-007-0990-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Schönbrodt S, Saumer P, Behrens T, Seeber C, Scholten T (2010) Assessing the USLE crop and management factor C for soil erosion modeling in a large mountainous watershed in Central China. J Earth Sci 21(6):835–845. doi: 10.1007/s12583-010-0135-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Seeber C, Hartmann H, Xiang W, King L (2010) Land use change and causes in the Xiangxi catchment, Three Gorges Area derived from multispectral data. J Earth Sci 21(6):846–855. doi: 10.1007/s12583-010-0136-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Subklew G, Ulrich J, Fürst L, Höltkemeier A (2010) Environmental impacts of the Yangtze Three Gorges project: an overview of the Chinese-German research cooperation. J Earth Sci 21(6):817–823. doi: 10.1007/s12583-010-0133-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. van Asselen S, Seijmonsbergen AC (2006) Expert-driven semi-automated geomorphological mapping for a mountainous area using a laser DTM. Geomorphology 78(3–4):309–320. doi: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2006.01.037 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Vijith H, Madhu G (2008) Estimating potential landslide sites of an upland sub-watershed in Western Ghat’s of Kerala (India) through frequency ratio and GIS. Environ Geol 55(7):1397–1405. doi: 10.1007/s00254-007-1090-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Yilmaz I (2009) Landslide susceptibility mapping using frequency ratio, logistic regression, artificial neural networks and their comparison: a case study from Kat landslides (Tokat–Turkey). Comput Geosci 35(6):1125–1138. doi: 10.1016/j.cageo.2008.08.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Zangerl C, Eberhardt E, Perzlmaier S (2010) Kinematic behaviour and velocity characteristics of a complex deep-seated crystalline rockslide system in relation to its interaction with a dam reservoir. Eng Geol 112(1–4):53–67. doi: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2010.01.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Markus Schleier
    • 1
    Email author
  • Renneng Bi
    • 1
    • 3
  • Joachim Rohn
    • 1
  • Dominik Ehret
    • 2
  • Wei Xiang
    • 3
  1. 1.GeoZentrum Nordbayern, Department of Applied GeologyUniversity Erlangen-NurembergErlangenGermany
  2. 2.State Office for Geology, Resources and Mining of Baden-WuerttembergFreiburg i. Br.Germany
  3. 3.Faculty of EngineeringChina University of GeosciencesWuhanChina

Personalised recommendations