Environmental Earth Sciences

, Volume 71, Issue 3, pp 1409–1419 | Cite as

Application of multivariate geostatistics in the investigation of heavy metal contamination of roadside dusts from selected highways of the Greater Toronto Area, Canada

Original Article

Abstract

A good understanding of roadside soil contamination and the location of pollution sources is important for addressing many environmental problems. The results are reported here of an analysis of the content of metals in roadside dust samples of four major highways in the Greater Toronto area (GTA) in Ontario, Canada. The metals analyzed are Pb, Zn, Cd, Ni, Cr, Cu, Mn, and Fe. Multivariate geostatistical analysis [correlation analysis (CA), principal component analysis (PCA), and hierarchical cluster analysis (HCA)] were used to estimate soil chemical content variability. The correlation coefficient shows a positive correlation between Cr–Cd, Mn–Fe, and Fe–Cu, while negatively between Zn–Cd, Mn–Cd, Zn-Cr, Pb–Zn, and Ni–Zn. PCA shows that the three eigenvalues are less than one, and suggests that the contamination sources are processing industries and traffic. HCA classifies heavy metals in two major groups. The cluster has two larger subgroups: the first contains only the variables Fe, Mn, Cu, Cr, Ni, and Pb, and the second includes Cd and Zn. The geostatistical analysis allows geological and anthropogenic causes of variations in the contents of roadside dust heavy metals to be separated and common pollution sources to be identified. The study shows that the high concentration of traffic flows, the parent material mineralogical and chemical composition, and land use are the main sources for the heavy metal concentration in the analyzed samples.

Keywords

Heavy metals Contamination Multivariate geostatistics Roadside dust Highways Greater Toronto Area Canada 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The project was supported by the Central Research Centre, College of Science, King Saud University.

References

  1. Abu-Rukah YH (2002) A study of soils along the Amman Aqaba highway contamination with heavy metals. Freiberger Forschngsheft Journal, Technische Universitat Bergakademie Freiberg, C494 Geowissenschaften, pp 53–62Google Scholar
  2. Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (1996) Soil Landscapes of Canada. Version 2.2, National Soil Data Base. Ottawa, Ontario: Agriculture and Agri-Food CanadaGoogle Scholar
  3. Agriculture Canada (1987) The Canadian System of Soil Classification. 2nd edn. Publication No. 1646. Ottawa, Ontario: Agriculture Canada, Research BranchGoogle Scholar
  4. Alloway BJ (1990) Heavy Metals in Soils. Blackie and Sons, GlasgowGoogle Scholar
  5. Anderson RH, Farrar DB, Thoms SR (2009) Application of discriminant analysis with cluster data to determine anthropogenic metals contamination. Sci Total Environ 408:50–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Astel A, Tsakovski S, Simeonov V, Reisenhofer E, Piselli S, Barbieri P (2008) Multivariate classification and modeling in surface water pollution estimation. Anal Bioanal Chem 390(5):1283–1292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Audat SAE (2000) Assessment study of soil pollution along the main highway in central and north Jordan, MSc thesis, Yarmouk University, JordanGoogle Scholar
  8. Bostock HS (1970) Physiographic subdivisions of Canada. In: Douglas RJW (ed) Geology and Economic Minerals of Canada. Economic Geology Report No. 1. Ottawa, Ontario: Geological Survey of Canada, pp 10–30Google Scholar
  9. Carlosena A, Andrade JM, Prada D (1998) Searching for heavy metals grouping roadside soils as a function of motorized traffic influence. Talanta 47:753–767CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chen D (2010) Geospatial analysis modelling of urban structure and dynamics. Springer e Book, SpringerGoogle Scholar
  11. De Miguel E, Llamas JF, Chacon E, Berg T, Larssen S, Royset O, Vadset M (1997) Origin and pattern of distribution of trace elements in street dust: unleaded petrol and urban Lead. Atmos Environ 31:2733–2740CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ellis JB, Revitt DM (1982) Incidence of heavy metals in street surface sediments: solubility and grain size studies. Water Air Soil Pollut 17:87–100Google Scholar
  13. Fergusson JE (1990) The heavy elements: Chemistry, Environment impact and health effects, vol 9, Pergamon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  14. Forest Landscape Ecology Program, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources (1996) Surficial Geology of Ontario: Digital Database and Viewing Software [CD-ROM]. Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario: Ontario Forest Research Institute, Ontario Ministry of Natural ResourcesGoogle Scholar
  15. Gee GW, Bauder JW (1986) Particle-size analysis. In: Klute A (ed) Methods of soil analysis, Part 1. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, pp 383–412Google Scholar
  16. Gratani L, Taglioni S, Crescente MF (1992) The accumulation of lead in agriculture soil and vegetation along a highway. Chemosphere 24(7):941–949CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Güler C, Thyne GD, McCray JE, Turner AK (2002) Evaluation of graphical and multivariate statistical methods for classification of water chemistry data. Hydrogeol J 10(4):455–474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Harrison RM, Laxen DPH, Wilson SJ (1981) Chemical association of lead and zinc in street dust and road side soils. Environ Sci Technol 15:1378–1381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Howari FM, Abu-Rukah Y, Goodell OC (2004) Heavy metal pollution of soils along North Shauna-Aqaba Highway, Jordan. Int J Environ Pollut 22(5):597–607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jiries AG, Hussein HH, Halash Z (2001) The quality of water and sediments of street runoff in Amman, Jordan. Hydrol Process 15:815–824CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lagerweff JV, Specht AW (1970) Contamination of roadside soils and vegetation with cadmium, nickel, lead and zinc. Environ Sci Technol 4:583–586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Li X, Liu PS (2001) Heavy metal contamination of urban soils and street dusts in Hong Kong. Appl Geochem 16:1361–1368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Loranger S, Zayed J (1994) Manganese and lead concentration in ambient air and emission rates from unleaded and leaded gasolina between 1981 and 1992 in Canada: a comparative study. Atmos Environ 28:1645–1651CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lux W (1986) Shhwarmetallgehalte und isoplethen in Boden, Subhydrishan Ablagerung Und Pflanzen im sudosten Hamburges. Hamburger Badenkudliche Arbeiten 5:249Google Scholar
  25. Manta DS, Angelone M, Bellaneca A, Neri R, Sproviri M (2002) Heavy metals in Urban soils: a case study from the city of Polermo (Sicily) Italy. Sci Total Environ 30:229–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Nazzal Y, Rosen MA, Al-Rawabdeh AM (2012) Assessment of metals pollution in urban road dusts from selected highways of the Greater Toronto Area in Canada. Environ Monit Assess J Springer. doi:10.1007/s10661-012-2672-3
  27. Population of Census Metropolitan Areas (2006) Census Boundaries Statistics Canada. http://www40.statcan.ca/l01/cst01/demo05a-eng.htm. Retrieved 2010-03-02
  28. Thornton I (1991) Metal contamination of soils in urban area In: Bullock P, Gregony PJ (eds) Soils in urban environment. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 47–75Google Scholar
  29. Thurston PC (1991) Geology of Ontario: Introduction. In: Thurston PC, Williams HR, Sutcliffe RH, Scott GM (eds). Geology of Ontario, special volume No. 4, Toronto, Ontario Geological Survey, pp 3–26Google Scholar
  30. Webster R, Atteia O, Dubois JP (1994) Coregionalization of trace metals in the soil in the Swiss Jura. Eur J Soil Sci 45:205–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wedepohl KH (1978) The composition of the continental crust. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 59:1217–1232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Wilcke W, Kretzschmar S, Bandt M, Saborio Gand Zech W (1998) Aluminum and heavy metal partitioning in a horizon of soils in Cost Rican coffee plantations. Soil Sci 163:463–471CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.King Saud UniversityDepartment of Geology and GeophysicsRiyadhSaudi Arabia
  2. 2.Faculty of Engineering and Applied ScienceUniversity of Ontario Institute of TechnologyOshawaCanada

Personalised recommendations