Environmental Earth Sciences

, Volume 70, Issue 3, pp 1039–1046

The top-cited wetland articles in science citation index expanded: characteristics and hotspots

Original Article

Abstract

The characteristics of wetland research were investigated by a bibliometric analysis of the top-cited wetland-related articles since 1899 based on the Science Citation Index Expanded database. The analyzed aspects included the distribution of journals, and publications by country, institution, and author, with five indicators including total articles, and independent, collaborative, first-author, and corresponding-author articles. Results showed that 188 articles on wetlands have been cited at least 100 times since their publication year to 2011. The most productive stage was 1991–2000, accounting for approximately seven-tenths of the top-cited articles. The US was the leading country, followed distantly by 25 other countries/territories. The US also held primacy in terms of productive institutions. The US Geological Survey ranked first according to the five indicators. The 188 top-cited articles had 637 authors, among whom W.J. Mitsch published the most first-author and corresponding-author articles. Furthermore, substance circulation (especially of carbon), wetland organisms and vegetation, and modeling methodology were the main focuses of wetland research in the past few years. In 2011, wetland organisms and vegetation were the hottest research topics. These results were coincident with a previous study on total publications, and revealed more-specific characteristics and hotspots of wetland research.

Keywords

Wetland Web of Science Classic articles Scientometrics 

References

  1. Bartlett KB, Harriss RC (1993) Review and assessment of methane emissions from wetlands. Chemosphere 26(1–4):261–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brandt JS, Downing AC, Howard DL et al (2010) Citation classics in obstetrics and gynecology: the 100 most frequently cited journal articles in the last 50 years. Am J Obstet Gynecol 203(4):355.e1–355.e7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brix H (1997) Do macrophytes play a role in constructed treatment wetlands? Water Sci Technol 35(5):11–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chiu WT, Ho YS (2005) Bibliometric analysis of homeopathy research during the period of 1991 to 2003. Scientometrics 63(1):3–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chiu WT, Ho YS (2007) Bibliometric analysis of tsunami research. Scientometrics 73(1):3–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chuang KY, Wang MH, Ho YS (2011) High-impact papers presented in the subject category of water resources in the essential science indicators database of the institute for scientific information. Scientometrics 87(3):551–562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Coleman J, Hench K, Garbutt K (2001) Treatment of domestic wastewater by three plant species in constructed wetlands. Water Air Soil Pollut 128(3–4):283–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Deil U (2005) A review on habitats, plant traits and vegetation of ephemeral wetlands—a global perspective. Phytocoenologia 35(2–3):533–705CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Drake JM, Griffen BD (2010) Early warning signals of extinction in deteriorating environments. Nature 467(7314):456–459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dubin D, Häfner AW, Arndt KA (1993) Citation classics in clinical dermatological journals: citation analysis, biomedical journals, and landmark articles, 1945–1990. Arch Dermatol 129(9):1121–1129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Falconer DS (1952) The problem of environment and selection. Am Nat 86(830):293–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Florides GA, Christodoulides P (2009) Global warming and carbon dioxide through sciences. Environ Int 35(2):390–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fu HZ, Wang MH, Ho YS (2012) The most frequently cited adsorption research articles in the Science Citation Index (Expanded). J Colloid Interf Sci 379(1):148–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fung I, John J, Lerner J (1991) Three-dimensional model synthesis of the global methane cycle. J Geophys Res-Atmos 96(D7):13033–13065CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Garfield E (1979) Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation. Science 178:471–479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Garfield E (1987) 100 citation classics from the Journal of the American Medical Association. JAMA-J Am Med Assoc 257(1):52–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gersberg RM, Elkins BV, Lyon SR et al (1986) Role of aquatic plants in waste-water treatment by artificial wetlands. Water Res 20(3):363–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gibbs JP (2000) Wetland loss and biodiversity conservation. Conserv Biol 14(1):314–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gisvold SE (1999) Citation analysis and journal impact factors: is the tail wagging the dog? Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 43:971–973CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Grumbles BH (1991) Wetlands, drainage ditches, and the Clean-Water-Act. J Soil Water Conserv 46(3):174–177Google Scholar
  21. Hein R, Crutzen PJ, Heimann M (1997) An inverse modeling approach to investigate the global atmospheric methane cycle. Glob Biogeochem Cycle 11(1):43–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ho YS (2012) Top-cited articles in chemical engineering in Science Citation Index Expanded: a bibliometric analysis. Chinese J Chem Eng 20(3):478–488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Holland CC, Honea JE, Gwin SE (1995) Wetland degradation and loss in the rapidly urbanizing area of Portland, Oregon. Wetlands 15(4):336–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Howarth RW, Billen G, Swaney D (1996) Regional nitrogen budgets and riverine N&P fluxes for the drainages to the North Atlantic Ocean: natural and human influences. Biogeochemistry 35(1):75–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Janssen R, Goosen H, Verhoeven ML (2005) Decision support for integrated wetland management. Environ Modell Softw 20(2):215–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kerbes RH, Kotanen PM, Jefferies RL (1990) Destruction of wetland habitats by lesser snow geese—a keystone species on the west-coast of Hudson-Bay. J Appl Ecol 27(1):242–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kiara H, Kourosh A, Andrew ME (2009) The top 100 cited articles in urology. CUAJ-Can Urol Assoc J 3(4):293–302Google Scholar
  28. Kivaisi AK (2001) The potential for constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment and reuse in developing countries: a review. Ecol Eng 16(4):545–560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Koerselman W, Meuleman AFM (1996) The vegetation N:P ratio: a new tool to detect the nature of nutrient limitation. J Appl Ecol 33(6):1441–1450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kumar JLG, Zhao YQ (2011) A review on numerous modeling approaches for effective, economical and ecological treatment wetlands. J Environ Manage 92(3):400–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. LeBauer DS, Treseder KK (2008) Nitrogen limitation of net primary productivity in terrestrial ecosystems is globally distributed. Ecology 89(2):371–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lefaivre KA, Guy P, O’Brien PJ, Blachut PA, Shadgan B, Broekhuyse HM (2010) Leading 20 at 20: top cited articles and authors in the Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma, 1987–2007. J Orthop Trauma 24(1):53–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Li JF, Zhang YH, Wang XS et al (2009) Bibliometric analysis of atmospheric simulation trends in meteorology and atmospheric science journals. Croat Chem Acta 82(3):695–705Google Scholar
  34. Lotze HK, Lenihan HS, Bourque BJ et al (2006) Depletion, degradation, and recovery potential of estuaries and coastal seas. Science 312(5781):1806–1809CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lubchenco J (1998) Entering the century of the environment: a new social contract for science. Science 279(5350):491–497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. MacKenzie DI, Nichols JD, Lachman GB et al (2002) Estimating site occupancy rates when detection probabilities are less than one. Ecology 83(8):2248–2255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mitsch WJ, Gosselink JG (2007) Wetlands, 4th edn. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  38. Mitsch WJ, Wilson RF (1996) Improving the success of wetland creation and restoration with know-how, time, and self-design. Ecol Appl 6(1):77–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Moed HF (2005) Citation analysis in research evaluation. ISSI 2005. In: Proceedings of the 10th international conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics 1–2:437–441Google Scholar
  40. Moed HF (2009) New developments in the use of citation analysis in research evaluation. Arch Immunol Ther Exp 57(1):13–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Neinhuis C, Barthlott W (1997) Characterization and distribution of water-repellent, self-cleaning plant surfaces. Ann Bot 79(6):667–677CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Niering WA (1968) Ecology of wetlands in urban areas. Garden J 18(6):177–183Google Scholar
  43. Pechmann JHK, Estes RA, Scott DE (2001) Amphibian colonization and use of ponds created for trial mitigation of wetland loss. Wetlands 21(1):93–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Picknett T, Davis K (1999) The 100 most-cited articles from JMB. J Mol Biol 293:173–176Google Scholar
  45. Pollock MM, Naiman RJ, Hanley TA (1998) Plant species richness in riparian wetlands—a test of biodiversity theory. Ecology 79(1):94–105Google Scholar
  46. Ponce FA, Lozano AM (2011) The most cited works in Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord 26(3):380–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Pouris A (1989) Strengths and weaknesses of South African science. S Afr J Sci 85:623–626Google Scholar
  48. Raich JW, Schlesinger WH (1992) The global carbon-dioxide flux in soil respiration and its relationship to vegetation and climate. Tellus Ser B-Chem Phys Meteorol 44(2):81–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Rasool SI, Schneide SH (1971) Atmospheric carbon dioxide and aerosols—effects of large increases on global climate. Science 173(3992):138–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Reddy KR, Kadlec RH, Flaig E (1999) Phosphorus retention in streams and wetlands: a review. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 29(1):83–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Rousseau DPL, Vanrolleghem PA, De Pauw N (2004) Model-based design of horizontal subsurface flow constructed treatment wetlands: a review. Water Res 38(6):1484–1493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Sarmiento JL, LeQuere C (1996) Oceanic carbon dioxide uptake in a model of century-scale global warming. Science 274(5291):1346–1350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Seglen PO (1998) Citation rates and journal impact factors are not suitable for evaluation of research. Acta Orthop 69(3):224–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Smirnoff N, Crawford RMM (1983) Variation in the structure and response to flooding of root aerenchyma in some wetland plants. Ann Bot 51(2):237–249Google Scholar
  55. Smith DR, Rivett DA (2009) Bibliometrics, impact factors and manual therapy: balancing the science and the art. Man Ther 14(4):456–459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Vandervalk AG (1981) Succession in wetlands—a gleasonian approach. Ecology 62(3):688–696CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Vymazal J (2007) Removal of nutrients in various types of constructed wetlands. Sci Total Environ 380(1–3):48–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Zhang L, Wang MH, Hu J et al (2010) A review of published wetland research, 1991–2008: ecological engineering and ecosystem restoration. Ecol Eng 36(8):973–980CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Zhao DH, Shen HW, Tabios GQ et al (1994) Finite-volume 2-dimensional unsteady-flow model for river basins. J Hydraul Eng-ASCE 120(7):863–883CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Environmental EngineeringPeking UniversityBeijingPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Trend Research CentreAsia UniversityTaichungTaiwan
  3. 3.Department of Environmental SciencesPeking UniversityBeijingPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations