Advertisement

Environmental Earth Sciences

, Volume 70, Issue 2, pp 901–912 | Cite as

Increase of vulnerability of karst aquifers due to leakage from landfills

  • Janja Kogovšek
  • Metka Petrič
Original Article

Abstract

Karst aquifers are very vulnerable to various pollution sources. Among these, landfills can contribute contaminants over long periods. Groundwater quality monitoring is required to assess the impact of a landfill leachate on underlying aquifer water or spring discharge. Tracer tests are useful for selecting the location and frequency of sampling. Three landfill sites in karst areas were studied with tracer tests. Additional insight was accomplished by the comparison of the tracer transfer and the breakthrough curves obtained from these tests with the results of two other tracer tests carried out in the same period in karst areas without a landfill. To explain the differences observed, the hypothesis of increased permeability below the landfill due to the presence of inorganic acids in leachates was further tested. The results of detailed, long-term monitoring of contaminated drip water in the Postojna Cave were used to verify the hypothesis. The analysis of the simultaneously increased content of calcium, magnesium, and contaminants in the drip water indicates a direct correlation between limestone dissolution and contaminants. Increased dissolution increases secondary porosity and thus permeability of the vadose zone resulting in higher vulnerability of underlying aquifers and springs in the vicinity landfills.

Keywords

Karst aquifer Landfill Tracer test Contaminants Increased vulnerability Slovenia 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The study was conducted in the frame of the research programme P6-0119 “Karst research” funded by the Slovenian Research Agency. Tracer tests were carried out as various applied projects financed by the companies which manage the landfills (public companies Komunala Ribnica, Komunala Kočevje, and Komunalno stanovanjsko podjetje Sežana), Ministry of defence, and Ministry of transport. We would like to thank the Slovenian Environment Agency and the ACEGAS company for giving us the precipitation and discharge data free of charge.

References

  1. Atkinson TC (1977) Carbon dioxide in the atmosphere of the unsaturated zone: an important control of groundwater hardness in limestones. J Hydrol 35:11–125Google Scholar
  2. Benavente J, Vadillo I, Carrasco F, Soler A, Linan C, Moral F (2010) Air carbon dioxide contents in the vadose zone of a Mediterranean karst. Vadose Zone J 9:126–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Benischke R, Goldscheider N, Smart CC (2007) Tracer techniques. In: Goldscheider N, Drew D (eds) Methods in karst hydrogeology. International contributions to hydrogeology. Taylor & Francis, London, pp 147–170Google Scholar
  4. Civita M, Cucchi F, Garavoglia S, Maranzana F, Vigna B (1995) The Timavo hydrogeologic system: an important reservoir of supplementary water resources to be reclaimed and protected. Acta carsol 24:169–186Google Scholar
  5. Clesceri LS, Greenberg AE, Eaton AD (1998) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 20th edn. American Public Health Association, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  6. De Rosa E, Rubel D, Tudino M, Viale R, Lombardo RJ (1996) The leachate composition of an old waste dump connected to groundwater: influence of the reclamation works. Environ Monit Assess 40:239–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Donevska KR, Gorsevski PV, Jovanovski M, Pesevski I (2012) Regional non-hazardous landfill site selection by integrating fuzzy logic, AHP and geographic information systems. Environ Earth Sci 67:121–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dreybrodt W (1988) Processes in karst systems (Physics, Chemistry, and Geology). Springer, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dreybrodt W (2000) Equilibrium Chemistry of karst water in limestone terranes. In: Klimchouk B, Ford CD, Palmer AN, Dreybrodt W (eds) Speleogenesis. National Speleological Society, Huntsville, pp 126–135Google Scholar
  10. Eiswirth M, Hötzl H, Jentsch G, Krauthausen B (1999) Contamination of a karst aquifer by a sanitary landfill. In: Drew D, Hötzl H (eds) Karst hydrogeology & human activities. A.A Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 159–167Google Scholar
  11. Field MS (2002) Efficient hydrologic tracer-test design for tracer-mass estimation and sample-collection frequency, 1, method development. Environ Geol 42(7):827–838CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ford DC, Williams PW (2007) Karst hydrogeology and geomorphology. Wiley, ChichesterCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gabrovsek F, Kogovsek J, Kovacic G, Petric M, Ravbar N, Turk J (2010) Recent results of tracer tests in the catchment of the Unica River (SN Slovenia). Acta Carsol 39(1):27–37Google Scholar
  14. Garcia R, Gonzales JA, Rubio V, Arteaga C, Galan A (2011) Soil contamination in dumps on the karstic areas from the plateaus (Southeast of Madrid, Spain). Water Air Soil Pollut 222(1–4):27–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Goldscheider N, Meiman J, Pronk M, Smart C (2008) Tracer tests in karst hydrogeology and speleology. Int J Speleol 37(1):27–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Günes ST, Turkman A (2007) Effect of a hazardous waste landfill area on groundwater quality. In: Ebel A, Davitashvili T (eds) Air, water and soil quality modelling for risk and impact assessment. Springer, Berlin, pp 281–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hall PJ, McCusker AJ, Bingham CT (1995) Site investigation, monitoring, and successful landfill closure within a karst terrain. In: Beck BF (ed) Karst geohazards: engineering and environmental problems in karst terrane. Proceedings of the 5th conference, Gatlinburg, Balkema, pp 189–194Google Scholar
  18. Hötzl H (1999) Industrial and urban produced impacts. In: Drew D, Hötzl H (eds) Karst hydrogeology & human activities. A.A Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 81–185Google Scholar
  19. Kaçaroğlu F (1999) Review of groundwater pollution and protection of karst areas. Water Air Soil Pollut 113:337–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Käss W (1998) Tracing technique in geohydrology. A.A. Balkema, RotterdamGoogle Scholar
  21. Kogovšek J (2010) Characteristics of percolation through the karst vadose zone. ZRC Publishing, LjubljanaGoogle Scholar
  22. Kogovšek J (2011) Impact of chlorides, nitrates, sulfates and phosphates on increased limestone dissolution in the karst vadose zone. Acta carsol 40(2):319–327Google Scholar
  23. Kogovšek J, Petrič M (2010) Tracer tests as a tool for planning the monitoring of negative impacts of the Mozelj landfill (SE Slovenia) on karst waters. Acta carsol 39(2):301–311Google Scholar
  24. Kolbezen M, Pristov J (1998) Surface streams and water balance of Slovenia. MOP-Hidrometeorološki zavod Republike Slovenije, LjubljanaGoogle Scholar
  25. Mahler BJ, Valdes D, Musgrove M, Massei N (2008) Nutrient dynamics as indicators of karst processes: comparison of the Chalk aquifer (Normandy, France) and the Edwards aquifer (Texas, U.S.A.). J Contam Hydrol 98:36–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mamon BA, Azmeh MM, Pitts MW (2002) The environmental hazards of locating wastewater impoundments in karst terrains. Environ Geol 65:169–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Marin AI, Dörfliger N, Andreo B (2012) Comparative application of two methods (COP and PaPRIKa) for groundwater vulnerability mapping in Mediterranean karst aquifers (France and Spain). Environ Earth Sci 65:2407–2421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Murray JP, Rouse JV, Alden BC (1981) Groundwater contamination by sanitary landfill leachate and domestic wastewater in carbonate terrain: principal source diagnosis, chemical transport characteristics and design implications. Water Res 15(6):745–757CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Novak D (1992) Tominčev studenec pri Dvoru in njegovo zaledje. Naše jame 33:63–73Google Scholar
  30. Ravbar N, Kovačič G (2010) Characterisation of karst areas using multiple geo-science techniques, a case study from SW Slovenia. Acta carsol 39(1):51–60Google Scholar
  31. Ravbar N, Barbera JA, Petric M, Kogovsek J, Andreo B (2012) The study of hydrodynamic behaviour of a complex karst system under low-flow conditions using natural and artificial tracers (the catchment of the Unica River, SW Slovenia). Environ Earth Sci 65:2259–2272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sasowsky ID, White WB, Webb JA (1995) Acid mine drainage in karst terranes: geochemical considerations and field observations. In: Beck BF (ed) Karst geohazards: engineering and environmental problems in karst terrane. Proceedings of the 5th conference, Gatlinburg, Balkema, pp 241–247Google Scholar
  33. Sauri-Riancho MR, Cabanas-Vargas DD, Echeverria-Victoria M, Gamboa-Marrufo M, Centeno-Lara R, Mendez-Novelo RI (2011) Locating hazardous waste treatment facilities and disposal sites in the State of Yucatan, Mexico. Environ Earth Sci 63:351–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Shi ZT, Liu X, Liu Y, Huang Y, Peng HY (2009) Catastrophic groundwater pollution in a karst environment: a study of phosphorus sludge waste liquid pollution at the Penshuidong Cave in Yunnan, China. Environ Earth Sci 59:757–763CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Trček B (2007) How can the epikarst zone influence the karst aquifer hydraulic behavior? Environ Geol 51(5):761–765Google Scholar
  36. Vadillo I, Carrasco F, Andreo B, Garcia de Torres A, Bosch C (1999) Chemical composition of landfill leachate in a karst area with a Mediterranean climate (Marbella, southern Spain). Environ Geol 37(4):326–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Vadillo I, Andreo B, Carrasco F (2005) Groundwater contamination by landfill leachates in a karstic aquifer. Water Air Soil Poll 162:143–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wicks CM, Groves CG (1993) Acidic mine drainage in carbonate terrains: geochemical processes and rates of calcite dissolution. J Hydrol 146(1):13–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Zhou W, Beck BF, Pettit AJ, Stephenson BJ (2002) A groundwater tracing investigation as an aid of locating groundwater monitoring stations on the Mitchell Plain of southern Indiana. Environ Geol 41:842–851CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Zwahlen F (2004) COST Action 620, vulnerability and risk mapping for the protection of carbonate (karstic) aquifers, final report COST action 620. European Commission, BrusselsGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Karst Research Institute at ZRC SAZUPostojnaSlovenia

Personalised recommendations