Environmental Earth Sciences

, Volume 69, Issue 8, pp 2643–2656 | Cite as

Prioritization of Malesari mini-watersheds through morphometric analysis: a remote sensing and GIS perspective

  • Dhruvesh P. Patel
  • Chintan A. Gajjar
  • Prashant K. Srivastava
Original Article

Abstract

Geographical information system and remote sensing are proven to be an efficient tool for locating water harvesting structures by prioritization of mini-watersheds through morphometric analysis. In this study, the morphometric analysis and prioritization of ten mini-watersheds of Malesari watershed, situated in Bhavnagar district of Saurashtra region of Gujarat state, India, are studied. For prioritization of mini-watersheds, morphometric analysis is utilized by using the linear parameters such as bifurcation ratio, drainage density, stream frequency, texture ratio, and length of overland flow and shape parameters such as form factor, shape factor, elongation ratio, compactness constant, and circularity ratio. The different prioritization ranks are assigned after evaluation of the compound factor. Digital elevation model from Shuttle Radar Topography Mission, digitized contour, and other thematic layers like drainage order, drainage density, and geology are created and analyzed over ArcGIS 9.1 platform. Combining all thematic layers with soil and slope map, the best feasibility of positioning check dams in mini-watershed has been proposed, after validating the sites through the field surveys.

Keywords

Watershed GIS Remote sensing Morphometric analysis Prioritization 

References

  1. Bagyaraj M, Gurugnanam B, Nagar A (2011) Significance of morphometry studies, soil characteristics, erosion phenomena and landform processes using remote sensing and GIS for Kodaikanal hills, a global biodiversity hotspot in Western Ghats, Dindigul District, Tamil Nadu, South India. Res J Environ Earth Sci 3(3):221–233Google Scholar
  2. Bali R, Agarwal K, Nawaz Ali S, Rastogi S, Krishna K (2012) Drainage morphometry of Himalayan Glacio-fluvial basin, India: hydrologic and neotectonic implications. Environ Earth Sci 66(4):1163–1174. doi: 10.1007/s12665-011-1324-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brooks RP, Wardrop DH, Cole CA (2006) Inventorying and monitoring wetland condition and restoration potential on a watershed basis with examples from Spring Creek Watershed, Pennsylvania, USA. Environ manage 38(4):673–687CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cammeraat ELH (2004) Scale dependent thresholds in hydrological and erosion response of a semi-arid catchment in southeast Spain. Agric Ecosyst Environ 104(2):317–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chopra R, Dhiman RD, Sharma P (2005) Morphometric analysis of sub-watersheds in Gurdaspur district, Punjab using remote sensing and GIS techniques. J Indian Soc Remote Sens 33(4):531–539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chowdary V, Ramakrishnan D, Srivastava Y, Chandran V, Jeyaram A (2009) Integrated water resource development plan for sustainable management of Mayurakshi watershed, India using remote sensing and GIS. Water Resour Manage 23(8):1581–1602CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dawod G, Mirza M, Al-Ghamdi K (2012) GIS-based estimation of flood hazard impacts on road network in Makkah City, Saudi Arabia. Environ Earth Sci 1–11 doi: 10.1007/s12665-012-1660-9
  8. Fan J, Guo X, Ge D, Liu S, Liu G, Guo H (2006) Monitoring urban subsidence in the city of Tianjin (China) by differential SAR interferometry. In: Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium 2006. IGARSS 2006, IEEE International Conference on pp 3321–3324Google Scholar
  9. Gujarat Ecology Commission (1992) Forest & Environment Department, Government of Gujarat, India. http://www.gec.gov.in/gecweb/home.asp
  10. Gupta M, Srivastava PK (2010) Integrating GIS and remote sensing for identification of groundwater potential zones in the hilly terrain of Pavagarh, Gujarat, India. Water Int 35(2):233–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gupta K, Deelstra J, Sharma K (1997) Estimation of water harvesting potential for a semiarid area using GIS and remote sensing. IAHS Publications-Series of Proceedings and Reports-Intern Assoc Hydrological Sciences 242:63Google Scholar
  12. Hlaing KT, Haruyama S, Aye MM (2008) Using GIS-based distributed soil loss modeling and morphometric analysis to prioritize watershed for soil conservation in Bago river basin of Lower Myanmar. Front Earth Sci China 2(4):465–478CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Horton RE (1945) Erosional development of streams and their drainage basins; hydrophysical approach to quantitative morphology. Geol Soc Am Bull 56(3):275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Horton RE (1932) Drainage basin characteristics. Trans Am Geophys Union 13:350–361Google Scholar
  15. Huggel C, Schneider D, Miranda PJ, Delgado Granados H, Kääb A (2008) Evaluation of ASTER and SRTM DEM data for lahar modeling: a case study on lahars from Popocatépetl Volcano, Mexico. J Volcanol Geoth Res 170(1):99–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Javed A, Khanday MY, Ahmed R (2009) Prioritization of sub-watersheds based on morphometric and land use analysis using remote sensing and GIS techniques. J Indian Soc Remote Sens 37(2):261–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Javed A, Khanday MY, Rais S (2011) Watershed prioritization using morphometric and land use/land cover parameters: a remote sensing and GIS based approach. J Geol Soc India 78(1):63–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Johnson N, Ravnborg HM, Westermann O, Probst K (2002) User participation in watershed management and research. Water Policy 3(6):507–520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kessler WB, Salwasser H, Cartwright Jr CW, Caplan JA (1992) New perspectives for sustainable natural resources management. Ecol Appl 2:221–225Google Scholar
  20. Kumar MG, Agarwal A, Bali R (2008) Delineation of potential sites for water harvesting structures using remote sensing and GIS. J Indian Soc Remote Sens 36(4):323–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Magesh NS, Chandrasekar N, Soundranayagam JP (2011) Morphometric evaluation of Papanasam and Manimuthar watersheds, parts of Western Ghats, Tirunelveli district, Tamil Nadu, India: a GIS approach. Environ Earth Sci 64(2):373–381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Magesh NS, Jitheshlal K, Chandrasekar N, Jini K (2012) GIS based morphometric evaluation of Chimmini and Mupily watersheds, parts of Western Ghats, Thrissur District, Kerala, India. Earth Sci Inform 5:111–121Google Scholar
  23. Miller VC (1953) A quantitative geomorphic study of drainage basin characteristics in the Clinch Mountain area Virginia and Tennessee. DTIC DocumentGoogle Scholar
  24. Miller JR, Craig Kochel R (2010) Assessment of channel dynamics, in-stream structures and post-project channel adjustments in North Carolina and its implications to effective stream restoration. Environ Earth Sci 59(8):1681–1692CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mukherjee S, Sashtri S, Gupta M, Pant MK, Singh C, Singh SK, Srivastava PK, Sharma KK (2007) Integrated water resource management using remote sensing and geophysical techniques: Aravali quartzite, Delhi, India. J Environ Hydrol 15. Paper no 10Google Scholar
  26. Mukherjee S, Shashtri S, Singh C, Srivastava PK, Gupta M (2009) Effect of canal on land use/land cover using remote sensing and GIS. J Indian Soc Remote Sens 37(3):527–537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Nooka Ratnam K, Srivastava Y, Venkateswara Rao V, Amminedu E, Murthy KSR (2005) Check dam positioning by prioritization of micro-watersheds using SYI model and morphometric analysis—remote sensing and GIS perspective. J Indian Soc Remote Sens 33(1):25–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Osborne LL, Wiley MJ (1988) Empirical relationships between land use/cover and stream water quality in an agricultural watershed. J Environ Manage 26(1):9–27Google Scholar
  29. Pandey PC, Sharma LK, Nathawat MS (2012) Geospatial strategy for sustainable management of municipal solid waste for growing urban environment. Environ Monit Assess 184:2419–2431Google Scholar
  30. Patel DP, Dholakia M (2010) Feasible structural and non-structural measures to minimize effect of flood in lower Tapi basin. Int J WSEAS Trans Fluid Mech 3(5):104–121Google Scholar
  31. Patel DP, Dholakia M, Naresh N, Srivastava PK (2012) Water harvesting structure positioning by using geo-visualization concept and prioritization of mini-watersheds through morphometric analysis in the lower Tapi basin. J Indian Soc Remote Sens 40(2):299–312. doi: 10.1007/s12524-011-0147-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Schumm SA (1956) Evolution of drainage systems and slopes in badlands at Perth Amboy, New Jersey. Bull Geol Soc Am 67(5):597CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Singh S, Singh MC (1997) Morphometric analysis of Kanhar river basin. Nat Geogr J of India 43(1):31–43Google Scholar
  34. Srivastava PK, Mukherjee S, Gupta M (2008) Groundwater quality assessment and its relation to land use/land cover using remote sensing and GIS. Proceedings of international groundwater conference on groundwater use—efficiency and sustainability: groundwater and drinking water issues, Jaipur, India 19–22Google Scholar
  35. Srivastava PK, Mukherjee S, Gupta M (2010) Impact of urbanization on land use/land cover change using remote sensing and GIS: a case study. Int J Ecol Econ Stat 18(S10):106–117Google Scholar
  36. Srivastava PK, Mukherjee S, Gupta M, Singh S (2011) Characterizing monsoonal variation on water quality index of River Mahi in India using geographical information system. Water Qual Expo Health 2(3):193–203. doi: 10.1007/s12403-011-0038-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Srivastava PK, Gupta M, Mukherjee S (2012a) Mapping spatial distribution of pollutants in groundwater of a tropical area of India using remote sensing and GIS. Appl Geomat 4(1):21–32. doi: 10.1007/s12518-011-0072-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Srivastava PK, Han D, Gupta M, Mukherjee S (2012b) Integrated framework for monitoring groundwater pollution using a geographical information system and multivariate analysis. Hydrol Sci J 57(7):1453–1472. doi: 10.1080/02626667.2012.716156 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Srivastava PK, Han D, Rico-Ramirez MA, Bray M, Islam T (2012c) Selection of classification techniques for land use/land cover change investigation. Adv Space Res 50(9):1250–1265. doi: 10.1016/j.asr.2012.06.032 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Srivastava PK, Kiran G, Gupta M, Sharma N, Prasad K (2012d) A study on distribution of heavy metal contamination in the vegetables using GIS and analytical technique. Int J Ecol Dev 21(1):89–99Google Scholar
  41. Strahler AN (1957) Quantitative analysis of watershed geomorphology. Trans Am Geophys Union 38(6):913–920CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Thakkar AK, Dhiman S (2007) Morphometric analysis and prioritization of miniwatersheds in Mohr watershed, Gujarat using remote sensing and GIS techniques. J Indian Soc Remote Sens 35(4):313–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Thakur J, Srivastava PK, Singh S, Vekerdy Z (2012) Ecological monitoring of wetlands in semi-arid region of Konya closed Basin, Turkey. Reg Environ Change 12(1):133–144. doi: 10.1007/s10113-011-0241-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Thomas J, Joseph S, Thrivikramji K, Abe G, Kannan N (2012) Morphometrical analysis of two tropical mountain river basins of contrasting environmental settings, the southern Western Ghats, India. Environ Earth Sci 66(8):2353–2366. doi: 10.1007/s12665-011-1457-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Youssef AM, Pradhan B, Hassan AM (2011) Flash flood risk estimation along the St. Katherine road, southern Sinai, Egypt using GIS based morphometry and satellite imagery. Environ Earth Sci 62(3):611–623CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dhruvesh P. Patel
    • 1
  • Chintan A. Gajjar
    • 2
  • Prashant K. Srivastava
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Civil EngineeringDr Jivraj Mehta Institute of TechnologyAnandIndia
  2. 2.Water Resources ManagementS.S. Engineering CollegeBhavnagarIndia
  3. 3.Department of Civil Engineering, Water and Environment Management Research CentreUniversity of BristolBristolUK

Personalised recommendations