Advertisement

Environmental Earth Sciences

, Volume 68, Issue 6, pp 1797–1812 | Cite as

GIS-based land suitability analysis integrating multi-criteria evaluation for the allocation of potential pollution sources

  • Ingrida Bagdanavičiūtė
  • Jurijus Valiūnas
Original Article

Abstract

The geological environment has been heavily polluted by chemical substances over the past few decades. Pollution sources located on the earth’s surface or underground have affected the quality of the environment. A significant amount of impact could be reduced if the allocation of potential pollution sources was based on an evaluation of environmental conditions. The main objective of this study was to develop a methodology for the allocation of potential pollution sources by employing GIS and multi-criteria evaluation techniques. This methodology was applied to a study area located in the eastern part of Lithuania. A GIS-based land suitability analysis was performed after identifying 16 factors concerning the geological and socio-economic environment, which were important for environmental protection, land use and spatial planning. The environmental and socio-economic factors were divided into eliminating and limiting criteria. Criteria maps based on the selected factors were compiled. Areas delineated by eliminating criteria were identified as unsuitable for development (according to national legislation). Limiting criteria were evaluated according to the suitability level, which were determined in this study considering the principles of sustainable development. The relative importance of each criterion was assessed utilising the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP). A land suitability index (LSI) was calculated and the final result of the land suitability analysis was summarized in three suitability maps (environmental, socio-economic and composite). Four suitability classes (unsuitable, least, moderately and most suitable) for the allocation of potential pollution sources in the study area were used, and the nine most suitable candidate sites were selected according to the proposed methodology.

Keywords

Geological environment Potential pollution sources Land suitability analysis Multi-criteria evaluation AHP GIS 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study was the subject of a Ph.D. thesis prepared at the Institute of Geology and Geography and partially supported by the State Studies Foundation of Lithuania. The authors are grateful to Dr. Darius Daunys and two reviewers for their valuable comments, which considerably improved the manuscript.

References

  1. Baltrūnas V, Diliūnas J, Kadūnas V, Valiūnas J (1998) Environmental geology and geochemistry in Lithuania. Geologija 26:5–26 (in Lithuanian)Google Scholar
  2. Bucevičiūtė S, Marcinkevičius V, Dansevičienė D (1995) Engineering geology map of Lithuania scale 1: 500,000. Geological survey of Lithuania, VilniusGoogle Scholar
  3. Bucevičiūtė S, Gadeikis S, Dundulis K, Ignatavičius V, Marcinkevičius V (2004) Engineering geology map of Lithuania scale 1: 1,000,000. In: Baltrūnas J (ed) Evolution of Earth and its resources. VilniusGoogle Scholar
  4. Council Directive on the Landfill of Waste (99/31/EC) Official Journal L 182, 16/07/1999: 0001–0073Google Scholar
  5. Delgado OB, Mendoza M, Granados EL, Geneletti D (2008) Analysis of land suitability for the sitting of inter-municipal landfills in the Cuitzeo Lake Basin, Mexico. J Environ Manage 28:1137–1146Google Scholar
  6. Diliūnas J, Bajorinas V, Čyžius G, Jagminas E, Jurevičius A, Kaminskas M, Karvelienė D (2004) Groundwater technogenesis features. In: Baltrūnas J (ed) Evolution of Earth and its resources. Vilnius, pp 481–514 (in Lithuanian)Google Scholar
  7. Dobkevičius M, Klizas P, Piličiauskas V, Plankis M (1995) Field measurements of filtration in aeration zone. Geologijos akiračiai 1:57–62 (in Lithuanian)Google Scholar
  8. Dörhöfer G, Siebert H (1997) The search for landfill sites—requirements and implementation in Lower Saxony, Germany. Environ Geol 35:55–65Google Scholar
  9. GRL (2012) Government of the republic of Lithuania. Special condition of land and forest use. Official Gazette No. 80–4168 (in Lithuanian)Google Scholar
  10. Holman IP, Palmer RC, Leonavciute N (2000) Using soil and Quaternary geological information to assess the intrinsic groundwater vulnerability of shallow aquifers: an example from Lithuania. Hydrogeol J 8:636–645CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jankowski P (1995) Integrating geographical information systems and multiple criteria decision making methods. Int J Geogr Inform Syst 9(3):251–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Juodis J, Jasinskas J (1998) Soil map of Lithuania scale 1:300,000. National land planning institute, VilniusGoogle Scholar
  13. Juodkazis V, Kanopienė R, Šugalskienė J (1998) Pollution sources of geological. Geologijos akiračiai 2(30):45–54 (in Lithuanian)Google Scholar
  14. Kanopienė R, Marcinkevičius V (1995) Methodology of groundwater vulnerability assessment and mapping techniques. Geol science achievements—nature conservation. Vilnius 44–46 (in Lithuanian)Google Scholar
  15. Kanopienė R, Dansevičienė D, Urbanovic E (2004) Shallow groundwater vulnerability assessment and mapping in Lithuania (scale 1:200,000). Lithuanian Geological Survey under the Ministry of Environment, Vilnius (in Lithuanian)Google Scholar
  16. Kontos TD, Komilis DP, Halvadakis CP (2005) Siting MSW landfills with a spatial multiple criteria analysis methodology. Waste Manage (Oxford) 25:818–832CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lamelas MT, Marinoni O, Hoppe A, de la Riva J (2007) Suitability analysis for sand and gravel extraction site location in the context of a sustainable development in the surroundings of Zaragoza (Spain). Environ Geol 55(8):1673–1686. doi: 10.1007/s00254-007-1116-955-65 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Land Suitability Analysis User Guide for ArcView 3.x and ArcGis 9.x (2005) NC Division of coastal management, center for geographic information and analysis. http://dcm2.enr.state.nc.us/planning/user_guide_lsa2005.pdf
  19. LGSME (1999) Lithuanian geological survey under the ministry of environment. Classification of solid mineral resources of Lithuania. Official Gazette No.81-247 (in Lithuanian)Google Scholar
  20. Malczewski J (1999) GIS and multicriteria decision analysis. John Wiley and Sons, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  21. Malczewski J (2004) GIS-based land-use suitability analysis: a critical overview. Progress Planning 62(1):3–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. McHarg IL (1969) Design with nature. Natural History Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  23. MERL (2000) Ministry of environment of the republic of Lithuania. Regulation of construction, operation, closure, and monitoring after closure of solid wastes landfills Official Gazette No. 96-3051 (in Lithuanian)Google Scholar
  24. MERL (2007) Ministry of environment of the republic of Lithuania. Description for the determination of Surface Water Body Protection Zones. Official Gazette No. 23-892 (in Lithuanian)Google Scholar
  25. MHRL (2003) Ministry of health of the republic of Lithuania. Lithuanian hygiene standard HN 60:2004, maximum allowable concentration of hazardous substances in soil. Official Gazette No. 25-1019 (in Lithuanian)Google Scholar
  26. Murphy MD (2005) Landscape architecture theory: an evolving body of thought. Waveland Pr Inc, Long GroweGoogle Scholar
  27. NSSD (2003) National strategy for sustainable development. Official Gazette No. 22-652 (in Lithuanian)Google Scholar
  28. Proske H, Vlcko J, Rosenbaum MS, Dorn M, Culshaw M, Marker B (2005) Special purpose mapping for waste disposal sites. Bull Eng Geol Environ 64(1):1–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Saaty TL (1980) The Analytic hierarchy process. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  30. Saaty TL (1996) Multicriteria decision-making: the analytic hierarchy process. RWS Publications, PittsburghGoogle Scholar
  31. Sener B, Lutfi Suzen M, Doyuran V (2006) Landfill site selection by using geographic information systems. Environ Geol 49:376–388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sener S, Sener E, Karaguzel R (2010) Solid waste disposal site selection with GIS and AHP methodology: a case study in Senirkent-Uluborlu Ispart) Basin, Turkey. Environ Monit Assess 173(1–4):533–554. doi: 10.1007/s10661-010-1403-x Google Scholar
  33. Siddiqui MZ, Everett JW, Vieux BE (1996) Landfill sitting using geographic information systems: a demonstration. J Environ Eng 122:515–523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Simsek C, Kincal C, Gunduz O (2006) A solid waste disposal site selection procedure based on groundwater vulnerability mapping. Environ Geol 49:620–633CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Šugalskienė J, Kanopienė R (2002) Inventory of pollution sources. Annual report 2001. Geological survey of Lithuania, VilniusGoogle Scholar
  36. Valiūnas J, Guobytė R, Jonynas J, Šliaupa A, Vaitkevičienė J (2000) Scientific report. Evaluation of geological potential and ecogeological features of Ignalina municipality and digital ecogeological maps compilation (scale M 1:50,000). Institute of geology, Vilnius (in Lithuanian)Google Scholar
  37. Van Lier HN (1998) The role of land-use planning in sustainable rural systems. Landscape Urban Plan 41:83–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. WCED (1978) World commission on environment and development. Our common future. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  39. Weerakoon KGPK (2002) Integration of GIS based suitability analysis and multi criteria evaluation for urban land use planning; contribution from the analytic hierarchy process. 23rd Asian Conference on Remote Sensing. ACRS Urban Planning, KathmanduGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Coastal Research and Planning InstituteKlaipėda UniversityKlaipėdaLithuania
  2. 2.Institute of Geology and GeographyNature Research CentreVilniusLithuania

Personalised recommendations