Advertisement

Environmental Earth Sciences

, Volume 66, Issue 5, pp 1513–1523 | Cite as

Geochemical characteristics of the mud volcano fluids in southwestern Taiwan and their possible linkage to elevated arsenic concentration in Chianan plain groundwater

  • Chia-Chuan Liu
  • Jyoti Prakash Maity
  • Jiin-Shuh Jean
  • A. H. M. Selim Reza
  • Zhaohui Li
  • Bibhash Nath
  • Ming-Kuo Lee
  • Kao-Hung Lin
  • Prosun Bhattacharya
Original Article

Abstract

Fluid and mud samples were collected from Wushanting (WST), Hsiaokunshui (HKS), Yenshuikeng (YSK), Kuantzeling (KZL), and Kunshuiping (KSP) mud volcanoes of southwestern Taiwan. Concentrations of major ions and trace elements in mud volcanic fluids were analyzed to find the possible linkage to elevated arsenic (As) concentrations in the Chianan plain groundwater. The elevated Na+, K+, and Cl concentrations indicated possible marine origin of the fluids. The trace element concentrations in the mud volcanic fluids were generally low, but the As concentrations were up to 0.12 mg/L. High contents of As, Fe, and Mn were observed in the mud samples. Saturation index calculations indicated that both carbonate and oxide minerals acted as potential sinks for As in the mud volcanic fluids. Arsenic in the dewatering fluids and muds may be transported by the subsurface flow and surface streams as suspended solids and eventually deposited in the Chianan plain aquifers. Under reducing conditions, As may be released from the host minerals (such as Fe- and Mn-oxides/hydroxides), thereby causing widespread groundwater As pollution.

Keywords

Arsenic Mud volcano Saturation indices Speciation Groundwater Taiwan 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank National Science Council of Taiwan for partial financial support (NSC98-2627-M-006-004). Mr. Jiann-Hong Liu’s help in field work is gratefully acknowledged. We also thank anonymous reviewer for constructive comments to improve this manuscript.

References

  1. Alain K, Thomas H, Florin M, Marcus E, Tina T, Martin K (2006) Microbiological investigation of methane- and hydrocarbon-discharging mud volcanoes in the Carpathian Mountains, Romania. Environ Microbiol 8:574–590CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bethke CM (1996) Geochemical reaction modeling. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. Brown K (1990) The nature and hydrogeologic significance of mud diapirs and diatremes for accretionary systems. J Geophys Res 95:8969–8982CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Carson B, Screaton EJ (1998) Fluid flow in accretionary prisms: evidence for focused, time-variable discharge. Rev Geophys 36:329–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chang CP, Angelier J, Huang CY (2000) Origin and evolution of a melange: the active plate boundary and suture zone of the Longitudinal Valley, Taiwan. Tectonophys 325:43–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Craig H (1966) Isotopic composition and origin of the Red Sea and Salton Sea geothermal brines. Science 154:1544–1548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dia AN, Castrec M, Boulègue J, Comeau P (1999) Trinidad mud volcanoes: where do the expelled fluids come from? Geochim Cosmochim Acta 63:1023–1038CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dimitrov LI (2002) Mud volcanoes—the most important pathway for degassing deeply buried sediments. Earth Sci Rev 59:49–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Drever JI (1988) The Geochemistry of Natural Waters, 2nd ed. Prentice Hall, Englewood CliffsGoogle Scholar
  10. Duchi V, Minissale A, Vaselli O, Ancillotti M (1995) Hydrogeochemistry of the Campania Region in Southern Italy. J Volcanol Geoth Res 67:313–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gieskes JM, You CF, Lee T, Yui TF, Chen HW (1992) Hydrogeochemistry of mud volcanoes in Taiwan. Acta Geol Taiwan 30:79–88Google Scholar
  12. Klute A (1986) Method of soil analysis, part 1: physical and mineralogical methods. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WisconsinGoogle Scholar
  13. Kohl B, Roberts HH (1994) Fossil foraminifera from four active mud volcanoes in the Gulf of Mexico. Geo Mar Lett 14:126–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kopf AJ (2002) Significance of mud volcanism. Rev Geophys 40:1005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Li YH (1976) Denudation of Taiwan island since Pliocene epoch. Geology 4:105–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Liu C-C, Jean J-S, Nath B, Lee M-K, Hor L-I, Lin K-H, Maity JP (2009) Geochemical characteristics of the fluids and muds from two southern Taiwan mud volcanoes: Implications for water–sediment interaction and groundwater arsenic enrichment. Appl Geochem 24:1793–1802CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Liu C-C, Maity JP, Jean J-S, Sracek O, Kar S, Li Z, Bundschuh J (2011) Biogeochemical interactions amoung the arsenic, iron, humic substance, and bacterial activity in mud volcano in southern Taiwan. J Environ Sci Health Part A (accepted for publication)Google Scholar
  18. Martin JB, Kastner M, Egeberg PK (1995) Origins of saline fluids at convergent margins. In: Taylor B, Natland J (eds) Active margins and marginal basins of the western pacific, vol 88. AGU Geophysical Monograph Series, Washington, pp 219–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Milkov AV (2000) Worldwide distribution of submarine mud volcanoes and associated gas hydrates. Mar Geol 167:29–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Minissale A, Magro G, Martinelli G, Vaselli O, Tassi GF (2000) Fluid geochemical transect in the Northern Apennines (central-northern Italy): fluid genesis and migration and tectonic implications. Tectonophys 319:199–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Nath B, Jean J-S, Lee M-K, Yang H-J, Liu C-C (2008) Geochemistry of high arsenic groundwater in Chia-Nan plain, Southwestern Taiwan: possible sources and reactive transport of arsenic. J Contam Hydrol 99:85–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Parkhurst DL, Appelo CAJ (1999) User’s guide to PhreeqC (Version 2)—a computer program for speciation, batch-reaction, one-dimensional transport, and inverse geochemical calculations. Water-Resources Investigations Report US Geological Survey, Denver, Colorado, pp 99–4259Google Scholar
  23. Plank T, Langmuir CH (1998) The chemical composition of subducting sediment and its consequences for the crust and mantle. Chem Geol 145:325–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Planke S, Svensen H, Hovland M, Banks DA, Jamtveit B (2003) Mud and fluid migration in active mud volcanoes in Azerbaijan. Geo Mar Lett 23:258–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Porowski A (2006) Origin of mineralized waters in the Central Carpathian Synclinorium, SE Poland. Studia Geologica Polonica 125:67Google Scholar
  26. Reza AHMS, Jean J-S, Yang H-J, Lee M-K, Hsu H-F, Liu C-C, Lee Y-C, Bundschuh J, Lin K-H, Lee C-Y (2011) A comparative study on arsenic and humic substances in alluvial aquifers of Bengal delta plain (NW Bangladesh), Chianan plain (SW Taiwan) and Lanyang plain (NE Taiwan) implication of arsenic mobilization mechanisms. Environ Geochem Health 33:235–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Różański K, Aragus-Aguas L, Gonfiantini R (1993) Isotopic patterns in modern global precipitation. In: Stewart PK, Lohmann KC, McKenzie J, Savin S (eds) Climate Change in Continental Isotopic Records, vol 76. AGU Geophysical Monograph Series, Washington, pp 1–36Google Scholar
  28. Sheppard SMF (1986) Characterization and isotopic variations in natural waters. In: Valley JW, Taylor HP Jr, O’Neil JR (eds) Stable isotopes in high temperature geological processes, Rev Mineral Geochem 16:165–183Google Scholar
  29. Smedley PL, Kinniburgh DG (2002) A review of the source, behavior and distribution of arsenic in natural waters. Appl Geochem 17:517–568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Suppe J (1980) Imbricated structure of western foothills belt, south central Taiwan. Petrol Geol Taiwan 30:163–176Google Scholar
  31. Teng L-S (1990) Geotectonic evolution of Late Cenozoic arc-continent collision in Taiwan. Tectonophys 183:57–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Vogt PR, Gardner J, Crane K (1999) The Norwegian–Barents–Svalbard (NBS) continental margin: introducing a natural laboratory of mass wasting, hydrates and ascent of sediment pore water and methane. Geo Mar Lett 19:2–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wang C-H, Kuo C-H, Peng T-R, Chen W-F, Liu T-K, Chiang C-J, Liu W-C, Hung J-J (2001) Isotope characteristics of Taiwan Groundwaters. West Pac Earth Sci 1:415–428Google Scholar
  34. Wu C-M (1978) Characteristics of groundwater geology in the blackfoot disease endemic area. The Blackfoot Disease Prevention and Control Research Group of Taiwan, Provincial Health Department, Blackfoot Disease Research Report 5:1–24Google Scholar
  35. Yakimov MM, Giuliano L, Crisafi E, Chernikova TN, Timmis KN, Golyshin PN (2002) Microbial community of a saline mud volcano at San Biagio-Belpasso, Mt. Etna (Italy). Environ Microbiol 4:249–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Yang T-F, Yeh G-H, Fu C-C, Wang C-C, Lan T-F, Lee H-F, Chen C-H, Walia V, Sung Q-C (2004) Composition and exhalation flux of gases from mud volcanoes in Taiwan. Environ Geol 46:1003–1011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Yeh G-H (2003) Geochemistry and sources of mud-volcano fluids in Taiwan. MS dissertation, Institute of Oceanography, National Taiwan University, Taipei, TaiwanGoogle Scholar
  38. Yeh G-H, Yang T-F, Chen J-C, Chen Y-G, Song, S-R (2005) Fluid geochemistry of mud volcanoes in Taiwan. In: Martinelli G, and Panahi B (eds) Mud volcanoes, Geodynamics and seismicity. NATO science series: IV. Earth Environ Sci 51:227–237Google Scholar
  39. Yeh G-H, You C-F, Chen J-C, Yang T-F, Chen Y-G, Song S-R (2002) Fluid geochemistry of mud volcanoes at the accretionary prism in southern Taiwan. Goldschmidt Conference, Davos, Cambridge Publications, Cambridge, A862Google Scholar
  40. You C-F, Gieskes JM, Lee T, Yui T-F, Chen H-W (2004) Geochemistry of mud volcano fluids in the Taiwan accretionary prism. Appl Geochem 19:695–707CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Zuber A, Chowaniec J (2009) Diagenetic and other highly mineralized waters in the Polish Carpathians. Appl Geochem 24:1889–1900CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chia-Chuan Liu
    • 1
  • Jyoti Prakash Maity
    • 1
  • Jiin-Shuh Jean
    • 1
  • A. H. M. Selim Reza
    • 1
  • Zhaohui Li
    • 2
  • Bibhash Nath
    • 3
  • Ming-Kuo Lee
    • 4
  • Kao-Hung Lin
    • 5
  • Prosun Bhattacharya
    • 6
  1. 1.Department of Earth SciencesNational Cheng Kung UniversityTainanTaiwan
  2. 2.Department of GeosciencesUniversity of Wisconsin–ParksideKenoshaUSA
  3. 3.School of GeosciencesUniversity of SydneySydneyAustralia
  4. 4.Department of Geology and GeographyAuburn UniversityAuburnUSA
  5. 5.Sustainable Environmental Research CenterNational Cheng Kung UniversityTainanTaiwan
  6. 6.KTH-International Groundwater Arsenic Research Group, Department of Land and Water Resource EngineeringRoyal Institute of TechnologyStockholmSweden

Personalised recommendations