Advertisement

Environmental Earth Sciences

, Volume 63, Issue 6, pp 1289–1302 | Cite as

GIS-based impact assessment of land-use changes on groundwater quality: study from a rapidly urbanizing region of South India

  • Haris H. Khan
  • Arina Khan
  • Shakeel Ahmed
  • Jerome Perrin
Original Article

Abstract

This study attempts to assess the influence of changing land-use patterns on the groundwater quality of the hard rock aquifer system in the Maheshwaram watershed, near Hyderabad, India. The study area is a rapidly urbanizing region with land development progressing at a fast pace. To study the impact of this rapid urbanization and overall land-use transition, a groundwater quality index (GQI) was prepared within a geographical information system (GIS). The GQI integrates the different water quality parameters to give a final index value that can be used for spatio-temporal comparisons. The land-use transitions were closely monitored from 2003 to 2008 using multispectral satellite images. The land-use pattern has changed drastically with an increase in the built-up area at the expense of other land uses. The analysis reveals a rapid deterioration of groundwater quality related mainly to the increase in built-up land with unsewered sanitation and poultry farms. Seasonal variability of the groundwater quality was also assessed. Mean GQI decreased from 84.16 to 83.26 over a period of 5 years from 2003 to 2008, while seasonal variability of water quality increased. GQI and Seasonal Variability of water quality were integrated in GIS to yield a groundwater sustainability map, in terms of water quality. Zones of sustainable and unsustainable groundwater use were demarcated for better decision making related to municipal land allotment in this rapidly urbanizing region.

Keywords

GQI GIS Land-use Sustainability Maheshwaram 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The first author would like to thank the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), New Delhi, India, for funding the present research, in the form of CSIR Senior Research Fellowship. Thanks are also due to the two anonymous reviewers for suggestions that led to substantial improvement in the quality of this work.

References

  1. Ahmed S, De Marsily G (1987) Comparison of geostatistical methods for estimating transmissivity using data on transmissivity and specific capacity. Water Resour Res 23:1717–1737CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahn H, Chon H (1999) Assessment of groundwater contamination using geographic information systems. Environ Geochem Health 21:273–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. APHA (1998) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 20th edn. American Public Health Association, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  4. Appleyard S (1995) The impact of urban development on recharge and groundwater quality in a coastal aquifer near Perth, Western Australia. Hydrogeol J 3(2):65–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Atwood DF, Barber C (1989) The effects of Perth’s urbanisation on groundwater quality: a comparison with the case histories in the USA. In: Lowe G (ed) Proceedings of the Swan Coastal Plain groundwater management conference, Western Australia Resource Council, Perth, pp 177–190Google Scholar
  6. Babiker IS, Mohamed MAA, Hiyama T (2007) Assessing groundwater quality using GIS. Water Resour Manag 21:699–715CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Backman B, Bodisˇ D, Lahermo P, Rapant S, Tarvainen T (1998) Application of a groundwater contamination index in Finland and Slovakia. Environ Geol 36(1–2):55–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Barber C, Baron R, Broun J, Bates L, Locksey K (1993). Evaluation of changes in groundwater quality in relation to land-use changes in the Gwelup welfield, Western Australia: a study for the water authority of Western Australia: Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization, Division of Water Resources, Water Resources Series no. 12, 124 ppGoogle Scholar
  9. Barber C, Otto CJ, Bates LE, Taylor KJ (1996) Evaluation of the relationship between land-use changes and groundwater quality in a water-supply catchment, using GIS technology: the Gwelup Wellfield, Western Australia. Hydrogeol J 4(1):6–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ben Hammou Y (1995) Utilization of a GIS (ARC/INFO) for management of irrigated perimeters: case of the Tadla perimeter. Thesis IAV Hassan II, Rabat, pp 180Google Scholar
  11. Bhargava DS (1985) Expression for drinking water supply standards. ASCE 111(3):304–317Google Scholar
  12. Bohner J, McCloy KR, Strobl J (eds) (2006) SAGA—analysis and modelling applications. Gottinger Geographische Abhandlungen, Heft 115. Verlag Erich Goltze GmbH, Göttingen, 117 ppGoogle Scholar
  13. Brown RM et al (1970) A water quality index—do we dare? Water Sew Works 11:339–343Google Scholar
  14. Conrad O (2006) SAGA—program structure and current state of implementation. In: Böhner J, McCloy KR, Strobl J (eds) SAGA—analysis and modelling applications, vol 115. Verlag Erich Goltze GmbH, pp 39–52Google Scholar
  15. Dewandel B, Maréchal JC, Lachassagne P, Wyns R, Krishnamurthy NS (2006) A generalized 3-D geological and hydrogeological conceptual model of granite aquifers controlled by single or multiphase weathering. J Hydrol 330(1–2):260–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dinius SH (1972) Social accounting system for evaluating water. Water Resour Res 8(5):1159–1177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dinius SH (1987) Design of an index of water quality. Water Resour Bull 23(5):833–843Google Scholar
  18. Ducci D (1999) GIS techniques for mapping groundwater contamination risk. Nat Hazards 20:279–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Eiswirth M, Hötzl H, Lazar C, Merkler GP (1995) Detection of contaminant transport from damaged sewerage systems and leaky landfills. In: Groundwater quality: remediation and protection, IAHS 225, pp 337–346Google Scholar
  20. Engel BA, Navulur KCS (1999) The role of geographical information systems in groundwater engineering. In: Delleur JW (ed) The handbook of groundwater engineering. CRC, Boca Raton, pp 703–718Google Scholar
  21. Fritch TG, Yelderman JC, Dworkin SI, Arnold JG (2000) A predictive modeling approach to assessing the groundwater pollution susceptibility of the Paluxy Aquifer, Central Texas, using a geographic information system. Env Geol 39(9):1063–1069CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. GSI (2002) Geological map: Hyderabad quadrangle—Andhra Pradesh. Geological Survey of IndiaGoogle Scholar
  23. Gupta SK, Deshpande RD (2004) Water for India in 2050: first-order assessment of available options. Curr Sci 86:1216–1223Google Scholar
  24. Harkins RD (1974) An objective water quality index. J Water Pollut Control Fed 46(3):588–591Google Scholar
  25. Hirschberg KJ (1991) Inventory of known and inferred point sources of groundwater contamination in the Perth basin: Western Australia Department of Mines, Western Australia Geological Survey Record 1991–1997Google Scholar
  26. Horton RK (1965) An Index Number System for Rating Water Quality. J Water Pollut Control Adm 37(3):3000Google Scholar
  27. Krapac IG, Dey WS, Roy WR, Jellerichs BG, Smyth C (2000) Groundwater quality near livestock manure pits. In: Proceedings of the 8th international symposium on animal, agricultural and food processing wastes, October 9–11, 2000 Des Moines, IA ASAE Publication 701P0002, pp 710–718Google Scholar
  28. Kumar D (2004) Conceptualization and optimal data requirement in simulating flow in weathered-fractured aquifers for groundwater management. Unpublished PhD Thesis, Osmania University, Hyderabad, 263 ppGoogle Scholar
  29. Landwehr JM, Deininger RA (1976) A comparison of several water quality indices. J Water Pollut Control Fed 48(5):954–958Google Scholar
  30. Maréchal JC, Dewandel C, Subrahmanyam K, Torri R (2003) Specific methods for the evaluation of hydraulic properties in fractured hard-rock aquifers. Curr Sci 85(4):511–516Google Scholar
  31. Maréchal JC, Wyns R, Lachassagne P, Subrahmanyam K (2004) Vertical anisotropy of hydraulic conductivity in the fissured layer of the hard rock aquifers due to the geological patterns of weathering profiles. J Geol Soc India 63:545–550Google Scholar
  32. Maréchal JC, Dewandel B, Ahmed S, Galeazzi L, Zaidi FK (2006) Combined estimation of specific yield and natural recharge in a semi-arid groundwater basin with irrigated agriculture. J Hydrol 329:281–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Nas B, Berktay A (2008) Groundwater quality mapping in urban groundwater using GIS. Environ Monit Assess 160(1–4):215–227Google Scholar
  34. Nemerow NL, Sumitomo H (1970). Benefits of water quality enhancement. Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY Report No. 16110 DAJGoogle Scholar
  35. Olaya VF (2004) A gentle introduction to SAGA GIS. The SAGA User Group e.V., Gottingen, Germany, p 208Google Scholar
  36. Panno SV, Hackley KC, Greenberg SE (2000) An exploration of techniques for determining the origin of sodium and chloride in groundwater feeding South Elgin Fen. Unpublished report to Kane County Illinois, 23 ppGoogle Scholar
  37. Pelc J (1990) Gwelup groundwater scheme review: Water Authority of Western Australia Confidential Report WG115, 269 pGoogle Scholar
  38. Pionke HB, Sharma ML, Hirschberg KJ (1990) Impact of irrigated horticulture on nitrate concentrations in groundwater. Agric Ecosyst Environ 32:119–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Prati L et al (1971) Assessment of surface water quality by a single index of pollution. Water Res 5:741–751CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Schmidt KD (1977) Water quality variations for pumping wells. Ground Water 15(2):130–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Soltan ME (1999) Evaluation of groundwater quality in Dakhla Oasis (Egyptian Western Desert). Environ Monit Assess 57:157–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Štambuk-Giljanović N (1999) Water quality evaluation by index in Dalmatia. Water Res 33(16):3423–3440Google Scholar
  43. UNESCO/WHO/UNEP (1996) Water Quality Assessments—a guide to use of biota, sediments and water in environmental monitoring, 2nd edn. In: Chapman D (ed) Chapman & Hall Publishers. ISBN 0419215905(HB) 0419 216006(PB)Google Scholar
  44. Vinten AJA, Dunn SM (2001) Assessing the effects of land use on temporal change in well water quality in a designated nitrate vulnerable zone. Sci Total Environ 265:253–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Voznaya NF (1981) Chemistry of water and microbiology, 4th edn. Mir Publishers, MoscowGoogle Scholar
  46. WHO (2004) Guidelines for drinking-water quality, vol 1, 3rd edn, recommendations. WHO, Geneva, Switzerland, pp 145–220Google Scholar
  47. WHO (2006) Protecting groundwater for health: managing the quality of drinking-water sources. In: Schmoll O, Howard G, Chilton J, Chorus I (eds) IWA Publishing, London, UK, ISBN: 1843390795Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Haris H. Khan
    • 1
  • Arina Khan
    • 2
  • Shakeel Ahmed
    • 1
  • Jerome Perrin
    • 3
  1. 1.National Geophysical Research Institute (NGRI)Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR)HyderabadIndia
  2. 2.Aligarh Muslim UniversityAligarhIndia
  3. 3.Bureau de Recherches Géologiques et MinièresOrléansFrance

Personalised recommendations