Advertisement

Environmental Earth Sciences

, Volume 61, Issue 5, pp 1049–1064 | Cite as

Landslide susceptibility maps comparing frequency ratio and artificial neural networks: a case study from the Nepal Himalaya

  • Chandra Prakash Poudyal
  • Chandong Chang
  • Hyun-Joo Oh
  • Saro Lee
Original Article

Abstract

This study considers landslide susceptibility mapping by means of frequency ratio and artificial neural network approaches using geographic information system (GIS) techniques as a basic analysis tool. The selected study area was that of the Panchthar district, Nepal. GIS was used for the management and manipulation of spatial data. Landslide locations were identified from field survey and aerial photographic interpretation was used for location of lineaments. Ten factors in total are related to the occurrence of landslides. Based on the same set of factors, landslide susceptibility maps were produced from frequency ratio and neural network models, and were then compared and evaluated. The weights of each factor were determined using the back-propagation training method. Landslide susceptibility maps were produced from frequency ratio and neural network models, and they were then compared by means of their checking. The landslide location data were used for checking the results with the landslide susceptibility maps. The accuracy of the landslide susceptibility maps produced by the frequency ratio and neural networks is 82.21 and 78.25%, respectively.

Keywords

Landslide susceptibility GIS Frequency ratio Artificial neural networks Nepal 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the Basic Research Project of the Korea Institute of Geoscience and Mineral Resources (KIGAM) funded by the Ministry of Knowledge and Economy of Korea. We thank Mr. Surya P. Poudel for the landslide data collection in the field.

References

  1. Akgün A, Dag S, Bulut F (2008) Landslide susceptibility mapping for a landslide-prone area (Findikli, NE of Turkey) by likelihood-frequency ratio and weighted linear combination models. Environ Geol 54:1127–1143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Atkinson PM, Tatnall ARL (1997) Introduction to neural networks in remote sensing. Int J Remote Sens 18:699–709CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barredo JJ, Benavides A, Hervas J, Van Westen CJ (2000) Comparing heuristic landslide hazard assessment techniques using GIS in the Trijana basin, Gran Canaria Island, Spain. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinform 2:9–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beven K, Kirkby MJ (1979) A physically based, variable contributing area model of basin hydrology. Hydrol Sci Bull 24:43–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bonham-Carter GF (1994) Geographic information systems for geoscientists, modeling with GIS. Pergamon Press, Oxford, p 398Google Scholar
  6. Brabb EE, Pampeyan EH, Bonilla MG (1972) Landslide susceptibility in San Mateo County, California, Misc Field Studies Map MF360. US Geological Survey, Reston, VAGoogle Scholar
  7. Carrara A (1983) Multivariate methods for landslide hazard evaluation. Math Geol 15:403–426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carrara A, Cardinali M, Detti R, Guzzetti F, Pasqui V, Reichenbach P (1991) GIS techniques and statistical models in evaluating landslide hazard. Earth Surf Process 16:427–445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carrara A, Crosta G, Franttini P (2003) Geomorphological and historical data in assessing landslide hazard. Earth Surf Proc Land 28:1125–1142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Duman TY, Can T, Gokceoglu C, Nefeslioglu HA, Sonmez H (2006) Application of logistic regression for landslide susceptibility zoning of Cekmece Area, Istanbul, Turkey. Environ Geol 51:241–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Garrett J (1994) Where and why artificial neural networks are applicable in civil engineering. J Comput Civil Eng 8:129–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gerrard J (1994) The landslide hazard in the Himalayas: geological control and human action. Geomorphology 10:221–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gerrard J, Gardner R (2000) Relationships between rainfall and landsliding in the Middle hills. Nepal Norsk Geogr Tidsskr 54:74–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Günther A (2003) SLOPEMAP: programs for automated mapping of geometrical and kinematical properties of hard rock hill slopes. Comput Geosci 29:865–875CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Günther A, Carstensen A, Pohl W (2004) Automated sliding susceptibility mapping of hard rock hillslopes. Nat Hazard Earth System Sci 4:95–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Guzzetti F, Carrarra A, Cardinali M, Reichenbach P (1999) Landslide hazard evaluation: a review of current techniques and their application in a multi-scale study, Central Italy. Geomorphology 31:181–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hasegawa S, Dahal RK, Yamanaka M, Bhandari NP, Yatabe R, Inagaki H (2009) Causes of large landslides in the Lesser Himalaya of central Nepal. Environ Geol 57:1423–1434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Heuberger H, Masch L, Preuss E, Schrocker A (1984) Quaternary landslides and rock fusion in central Nepal and in the Tyrolean Alps. Mt Res Dev 4:345–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hines ML, Carnevale NT (1997) The NEURON simulation environment. Neural Comput 9:1179–1209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ives JD, Messerli B (1981) Mountain hazards mapping in Nepal: introduction to an applied mountain research project. Mt Res Dev 1:223–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jade S, Sarkar S (1993) Statistical models for slope stability classification. Eng Geol 36:91–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Laban P (1979) Landslide occurrence in Nepal, HMG/FAO and UNDP. Ministry of Forest, Department of Soil Conservation, Integrated Watershed Management, Kathmandu, 27 ppGoogle Scholar
  23. Lamelas MT, Marinoni O, Hoppe A, Riva J (2008) Doline probability map using logistic regression and GIS technology in the central Ebro Basin (Spain). Environ Geol 54:963–977CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lee S (2007) Comparison of landslide susceptibility maps generated through multiple logistic regression for three test areas in Korea. Earth Surf Proc Land 32:2133–2148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lee S, Dan NT (2005) Probabilistic landslide susceptibility mapping in the Lai Chau province of Vietnam: focus on the relationship between tectonic fractures and landslides. Environ Geol 48:778–787CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lee S, Min K (2001) Statistical analysis of landslide susceptibility at Yongin, Korea. Environ Geol 40:1095–1113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lee S, Sambath T (2006) Landslide susceptibility mapping in the Damrei Romel area, Cambodia using frequency ratio and logistic regression models. Environ Geol 50:847–856CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lee S, Talib JA (2005) Probabilistic landslide susceptibility and factor effect analysis. Environ Geol 47:982–990CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lee S, Choi J, Min K (2002) Landslide susceptibility analysis and verification using the Bayesian probability model. Environ Geol 43:120–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lee S, Ryu JH, Lee MJ, Won JS (2003a) Landslide susceptibility analysis using artificial neural network at Boeun, Korea. Environ Geol 44:820–833CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lee S, Ryu JH, Min K, Won JS (2003b) Landslide susceptibility analysis using GIS and artificial neural network. Earth Surf Proc Land 27:1361–1376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lee S, Choi J, Min K (2004) Probabilistic landslide hazard mapping using GIS and remote sensing data at Boeun, Korea. Int J Remote Sens 25:2037–2052CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Moore ID, Burch GJ (1986) Physical basis of length–slope factor in the Universal Soil Loss Equation. Soil Sci Soc Am J 50:1294–1298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Moore ID, Wilson JP (1992) Length–slope factors for the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation: simplified method of estimation. J Soil Water Conserv 47:423–428Google Scholar
  35. Moore ID, Grayson RB, Ladson AR (1991) Digital terrain modeling: a review of hydrological, geomorphological and biological applications. Hydrol Process 5:3–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Paola JD, Schowengerdt RA (1995) A review and analysis of backpropagation neural networks for classification of remotely sensed multi-spectral imagery. Int J Remote Sens 16:3033–3058CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Poudyal CP (2000) Geological studies in the southern part of Taplejung Window, Eastern Nepal and engineering geological studies around Phidim Bazaar. Dissertation, Tribhuvan UniversityGoogle Scholar
  38. Rengers N, Van Westen CJ, Chaco’n J, Irigaray C (1998) Draft for the chapter on the application of digital techniques for natural hazard zonation. Report on mapping of natural hazards, International Association of Engineering Geology, Commission no.1 on Engineering Geological Mapping, Culshaw and Marker, VancouverGoogle Scholar
  39. Rupke J, Cammeraat E, Seijmonsbergen AC, Van Westen CJ (1988) Engineering geomorphology of the Widentobel catchment, Apenzell and Sankt Gallen, Switzerland: a geomorphological inventory system applied to geotechnical appraisal of slope stability. Eng Geol 26:33–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Selby MJ (1988) Landforms and denudation of the High Himalaya of Nepal: results of continental collision. Z Geomorphol Neue Folge 69:133–152 (supplement band)Google Scholar
  41. Shang Y, Yang Z, Li L, Liu D, Liao Q, Wang Y (2003) A super large landslide in Tibet in 2000: background, occurrence, disaster, and origin. Eng Geol 54:225–243Google Scholar
  42. Shroder JF, Bishop MP (1998) Mass movement in the Himalaya: new insights and research directions. Geomorphology 26:13–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Singh TN, Kanchan R, Verma AK, Singh S (2003) An intelligent approach for prediction of triaxial properties using unconfined uniaxial strength. Min Eng J 5:12–16Google Scholar
  44. Süzen ML, Doyuran V (2004) A comparison of the GIS based landslide susceptibility assessment methods: multivariate versus bivariate. Environ Geol 45:665–679CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Tunusluoglu MC, Gokceoglu C, Nefeslioglu HA, Sonmez H (2008) Extraction of potential debris source areas by logistic regression technique: a case study from Barla, Besparmak and Kapi mountains (NW Taurids, Turkey). Environ Geol 54:9–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Upreti BN, Dhital MR (1996) Landslide studies and management in Nepal. ICIMOD, Nepal, p 87Google Scholar
  47. Upreti BN, Le Fort P (1999) Lesser Himalayan Crystalline Nappes of Nepal: problem of their origin. Geol Soc Am Bull, Special Issue 328:225–238Google Scholar
  48. Van Westen CJ (1994) GIS in landslide hazard zonation: a review, with examples from the Andes of Colombia. In: Price MF, Heywood DI (eds) Mountain environments and geographic information systems. Taylor and Francis, London, pp 135–165Google Scholar
  49. Van Westen CJ (2000) The modeling of landslide hazards using GIS. Surv Geophys 21:241–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Van Westen CJ, Lulie GF (2003) Analyzing the evolution of the Tessina landslide using aerial photographs and digital elevation models. Geomorphology 54:77–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Varnes DJ (1984) Landslide hazard zonation: a review of principles and practice. UNESCO, France, pp 1–63Google Scholar
  52. Wagner A (1983) The principal geological factors leading to landslides in the foothills of Nepal: a statistical study of 100 landslides-steps for mapping the risk of landslides. HELVETAS-Swiss Technical Cooperation and ITECO-Company for International Cooperation and Development, unpublished 58 ppGoogle Scholar
  53. Ward TJ, Ruh-Ming L, Simons DB (1982) Mapping landslide hazard in forest watershed. J Geotech Eng Div 108(GT-2):319–324Google Scholar
  54. Yilmaz I (2007) GIS based susceptibility mapping of krast depression in gypsum: a case study from Sivas basin (Turkey). Eng Geol 90:89–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Yilmaz I, Yildirim M (2006) Structural and geomorphological aspects of the Kat landslides (Tokat-Turkey), and susceptibility mapping by means of GIS. Environ Geol 50:461–472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Zhou W (1999) Verification of the nonparametric characteristics of backpropagation neural networks for image classification. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 37:771–779CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chandra Prakash Poudyal
    • 1
  • Chandong Chang
    • 1
  • Hyun-Joo Oh
    • 2
  • Saro Lee
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Earth and Environmental ScienceChungnam National UniversityDaejeonKorea
  2. 2.Geoscience Information CenterKorea Institute of Geoscience and Mineral Resources (KIGAM)DaejeonKorea

Personalised recommendations