Environmental Earth Sciences

, Volume 60, Issue 3, pp 583–590

Measurement of field-saturated hydraulic conductivity on fractured rock outcrops near Altamura (Southern Italy) with an adjustable large ring infiltrometer

  • Maria Clementina Caputo
  • Lorenzo De Carlo
  • Costantino Masciopinto
  • John Robert Nimmo
Original Article

Abstract

Up to now, field studies set up to measure field-saturated hydraulic conductivity to evaluate contamination risks, have employed small cylinders that may not be representative of the scale of measurements in heterogeneous media. In this study, a large adjustable ring infiltrometer was designed to be installed on-site directly on rock to measure its field-saturated hydraulic conductivity. The proposed device is inexpensive and simple to implement, yet also very versatile, due to its large adjustable diameter that can be fixed on-site. It thus allows an improved representation of the natural system’s heterogeneity, while also taking into consideration irregularities in the soil/rock surface. The new apparatus was tested on an outcrop of karstic fractured limestone overlying the deep Murge aquifer in the South of Italy, which has recently been affected by untreated sludge disposal, derived from municipal and industrial wastewater treatment plants. The quasi-steady vertical flow into the unsaturated fractures was investigated by measuring water levels during infiltrometer tests. Simultaneously, subsurface electrical resistivity measurements were used to visualize the infiltration of water in the subsoil, due to unsaturated water flow in the fractures. The proposed experimental apparatus works well on rock outcrops, and allows the repetition of infiltration tests at many locations in order to reduce model uncertainties in heterogeneous media.

Keywords

Large ring infiltrometer Fractured limestone Field-saturated hydraulic conductivity 

References

  1. Abdel-Salam A, Chrysikopoulos VC (1996) Unsaturated flow in a quasi three-dimensional fractured medium with spatially variable aperture. Water Resour Res 32:1531–1540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bear J (1979) Hydraulics of groundwater. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. Bear J (1993) Modeling flow and contaminant transport in fractured rocks. In: Bear J, Tsang CF, de Marsily G (eds) Flow and contaminant transport in fractured rock, vol 1. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 67–272Google Scholar
  4. Binley AM, Cassiani G, Middleton R, Winship P (2002) Vadose zone flow model parameterisation using cross-borehole radar and resistivity imaging. J Hydrol 267(3–4):147–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bockgård N, Niemi A (2004) Role of rock heterogeneity on lateral diversion of water flow at the soil–rock interface. Vadose Zone J 3:786–795CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Borgia GC, Bortolotti V, Masciopinto C (2002) Valutazione del contributo della porosità effettiva alla trasmissività di acquiferi fratturati con tecniche di laboratorio e di campo (Evaluation of effective porosity contribution to the transmissivity of fractured aquifer using laboratory and field techniques). IGEA Groundw Geoeng 17:31–43Google Scholar
  7. Castiglione P, Shouse PJ, Mohanty B, Hudson D, van Genucthen MTh (2005) Improved tension infiltrometer for measuring low flow rates in unsaturated fractured rock. Vadose Zone J 4:885–890CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ciaranfi N, Pieri P, Ricchetti G (1988) Note alla Carta Geologica delle Murge e del Salento (Puglia Centro-Meridionale) (Notes on the geological map of Murge and Salento—Center-Southern Apulia). Mem Soc Geol It 41:449–460Google Scholar
  9. de Gennes PG, Brochard-Wyart F, Quéré D (2002) Capillary and wetting phenomena—drops, bubbles, pearls, waves. Springer, New York (ISBN 0-387-00592-7)Google Scholar
  10. Deiana R, Cassiani G, Kemna A, Villa A, Bruno V, Bagliani A (2007) An experiment of non invasive characterization of the vadose zone via water injection and cross-hole time-lapse geophysical monitoring. Near Surf Geophys 5:183–194Google Scholar
  11. Hestir K, Long JCS (1990) Analytical expressions for the permeability of random two-dimensional Poisson fracture networks based on regular lattice percolation and equivalent media theories. J Geophys Res 95(B13):21565–21581CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Loke MH, Barker RD (1996) Rapid least-squares inversion of apparent resistivity pseudosections using a quasi-Newton method. Geophys Prospect 44:131–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Masbrucha K, Ferré TPA (2003) A time domain transmission method for determining the dependence of the dielectric permittivity on volumetric water content. An application to municipal landfills. Vadose Zone J 2:186–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Masciopinto C (2005) Pumping-well data for conditioning the realization of the fracture aperture field in groundwater flow models. J Hydrol 309(1-4):210–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Masciopinto C, Benedini M (1999) Unsaturated flow in fractures with anisotropic variable apertures. In: Proceedings of XXVIII IAHR—AIRH congress, 23–27 August, Graz, AustriaGoogle Scholar
  16. Nimmo JR, Schmidt KM, Perkins KS, Stock JD (2009) Rapid measurement of field-saturated hydraulic conductivity for areal characterization. Vadose Zone J 8(2):1–8Google Scholar
  17. Pape H, Clauser C, Iffland J (1999) Permeability prediction based on fractal pore-space geometry. Geophysics 64(5):1447–1460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Pruess K, Tsang YW (1990) On two-phase relative permeability and capillary pressure on rough-walled rock fractures. Water Resour Res 26(9):1915–1926Google Scholar
  19. Quarto R, Schiavone D (1994) Hydrogeological implications of the resistivity distribution inferred from electrical prospecting data from the Apulian carbonate platform. J Hydrol 154:219–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Reitsma S, Kueper BH (1994) Laboratory measurement of capillary pressure-saturation relationships in a rock fracture. Water Resour Res 30(4):865–878CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Reynolds WD, Elrick DE (1990) Ponded infiltration from a single ring: I. Analysis of steady flow. Soil Sci Soc Am J 54:1233–1241CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Maria Clementina Caputo
    • 1
  • Lorenzo De Carlo
    • 1
  • Costantino Masciopinto
    • 1
  • John Robert Nimmo
    • 2
  1. 1.Water Research InstituteIRSA-CNRBariItaly
  2. 2.USGSMenlo ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations