The hydrogeologic potential conditioning factors of hydrographic catchments of Upper Velhas River Basin, Southeastern Brazil

Original Article
First Online:
Received:
Accepted:
  • 98 Downloads

Abstract

The hydrogeologic potential of a drainage catchment represents its capacity of sustainable water production, with good maintenance of the baseflows. In basins of similar shapes and bio-climatic characteristics, the potential will depend on several physical and anthropogenic conditioning factors. The determination of the hydrogeologic potential is a complex procedure, but alternative methods exist, in which hydrologic series are used to determine certain indexes, such as the recession coefficient (α), the specific baseflow (SBF), the baseflow index (BFI), transmissivity and storativity. Aiming at the evaluation of the hydrogeologic potential and its conditioning factors in the Maracujá River Basin (southeastern Brazil), ten catchments were selected and monitored. The catchments have distinct geologic and geomorphologic characteristics but are submitted to similar climatic conditions. The hydrogeologic potential is higher in crystalline basement areas, especially where the relief is flat and the regolith is thick; however, it is lower in the areas affected by gullies. The advantages of the hydrologic method, in particular to regions where information is scarce, are that it is easily applied and of low cost, enabling the characterization of the hydrogeologic potential and contributing to the management of water resources.

Keywords

Hydrogeologic potential Catchments Baseflow Recession coefficient Hydrographical basins 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank the “Instituto do Milênio: Água uma visão mineral” project for the financial support to this work.

References

  1. Golder Associates (2001) Avaliação das interferências ambientais da mineração nos recursos hídricos na bacia do alto rio das Velhas (Evaluation of the environmental impacts of mining in the hydrological resources of Upper Velhas Basin). Relatório técnico final. Belo Horizonte, p 135 (in Portuguese)Google Scholar
  2. Bacellar LAP (2000) Condicionantes geológicos, geomorfológicos e geotécnicos dos mecanismos de voçorocamento na bacia do rio Maracujá, Ouro Preto, M.G. (Geological, geomorphological and geotechnical controlling factors of gullying in the Maracujá Catchment, Ouro Preto, M.G.). DSc, University of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil (in portuguese)Google Scholar
  3. Bacellar LAP, Coelho Netto AL, Lacerda WA (2005) Controlling factors of gullying in the Maracujá Catchment, southeastern Brazil. Earth Surf Processes Landforms 30:1369–1385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bosch JM, Hewlett JD (1982) A review of catchment experiments to determine the effect of vegetation changes on water yield and evapotranspiration. J Hydrol 55:3–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Castany G (1971) Tratado Practico de las Aguas Subterraneas (Practical treatise on groundwater). Ediciones Omega, Barcelona, p 672 (in Spanish)Google Scholar
  6. Chilton PJ, Foster SSD (1995) Hydrogeological characterization and water-supply potential of basement aquifers in tropical Africa. Hydrogeol J 3:36–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Costa FM (2005) Análise por métodos hidrológicos e hidroquímicos de fatores condicionantes do potencial hídrico de bacias hidrográficas—Estudo de casos no Quadrilátero Ferrífero—MG (Hydrological and hydrogeochemical analysis of the controlling factors of the hydric potential of hydrographic basins. Quadrilátero Ferrífero case studies—MG). MSc, Federal University of Ouro Preto. Brazil (in Portuguese)Google Scholar
  8. Costa FM, de Bacellar LAP (2007) Analysis of the influence of gully erosion in the flow pattern of catchment streams, Southeastern Brazil. Catena 69(issue 3):230–238Google Scholar
  9. Costa FM, Bacellar LAP, Silva EF (2007) Vertedores Portáteis em microbacias de drenagem (Portable weirs in catchments). REM-Revista da Escola de Minas 60(2):213–218 (in Portuguese)Google Scholar
  10. Cruz WB (1995) Diagnóstico Hidrogeológico (Hydrogeological Diagnosis). In: IGA/CETEC/SAE-PR, Desenvolvimento ambiental de Ouro Preto—Microbacia do Ribeirão do Funil. Relatório Técnico Final de Projeto de Pesquisa, pp v1–v34. (in Portuguese)Google Scholar
  11. Custodio E, Llamas MR (1976) Hidrologia Subterrânea (Underground hydrology) (v2). Ediciones Omega S.A, Barcelona (in Spanish)Google Scholar
  12. Deere DU, Patton FD (1971) Slope Stability in residual soils. Paper presented at the Fourth Panamerican Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering. Puerto Rico 1:87–170Google Scholar
  13. Dewandel B, Lachassagne P, Bakalowicz M, Weng Ph, Al-Malki A (2003) Evaluation of aquifer thickness by analyzing recession hydrographs. Application to the Oman ophiolite hard-rock aquifer. J Hydrol 274:248–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dorr JVN (1969) Physiographic, stratigraphic and structural development of Quadrilátero Ferrífero, Brazil. US Geological Survey Professional Paper 641(A)Google Scholar
  15. Dunne T (1980) Field studies of hillslope flow processes. In: Kirkby MJ (ed) Hillslope hydrology 3rd edn edn. Wiley, New york, pp 227–293Google Scholar
  16. Feitosa AC, Manoel Filho J (1997) Hidrogeologia: Conceitos e Aplicações (Hydrogeology: Concepts and Applications). CPRM. LABHID-UFPE (in Portuguese)Google Scholar
  17. Fetter CW (1988) Applied Hydrogeology, 2nd edn. Merrill Publishing Company, University of Wisconsin, OshkoshGoogle Scholar
  18. Freeze RA, Cherry JA (1979) Groundwater. Prentice Hall, Englewood CliffsGoogle Scholar
  19. Gonçalves JAC (2001) Contribuição à hidrogeologia e à hidroquímica do Leste da Zona da Mata de Minas Gerais e do extremo Noroeste do estado do Rio de Janeiro. Contribution to Eastern Zona da Mata hydrogeology and hydrogeochemistry, Minas Gerais, and Northwest Rio de Janeiro) MSc, Federal University of de Ouro Preto, Brazil (in Portuguese)Google Scholar
  20. Kellett R, Bauman P (1994) Mapping groundwater in regolith and fractured bedrock using ground geophysics: a case study from Malawi, SE Africa, Focus Article, CSEGGoogle Scholar
  21. Lacey GC, Grayson RB (1998) Relating baseflow to catchment properties in south-eastern Australia. J Hydrol 204:231–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Langbein WB (1938) Some channel-storage studies and their application to the determination of infiltration. Reports and Papers, hydrology, AGU 19: 435–447Google Scholar
  23. Lima WP, Zakia MJB (2000) Hidrologia de Matas Ciliares (Riparian Forest Hydrology). In: Rodrigues RR, Leitão Filho HF (eds) Matas Ciliares: Conservação e Recuperação. EDUSP/FAPESP, São Paulo, pp 33–44 (in Portuguese)Google Scholar
  24. de Mello MHA, Pedro Jr MJ, Lombardi Neto F (1994) Hidrologia, climatologia e agrometeorologia (Hydrology, climatology and agrometeorology). In: Bertolini D, Carraro E, Lombardi Neto F, Lepsch IF, de Mello MHA, Drugowich MI, Pedro Jr MJ, Bellinazzi Jr R (eds) Potencialidades Agrícolas das Terras dos estado de São Paulo. Manual Técnico de Manejo e Conservação de solo e água, 2, pp 1–68 (in Portuguese)Google Scholar
  25. Moldan B, Cerný J (1994) Biogeochemistry of Small Catchment: a tool for Environmental Research. SCOPE (Scientific Committee on the Problems of the Environment) (Eds.) Publication 51. John-Wiley, Índia. http://www.icsu-scope.org/downloadpubs/scope51/index.html. Cited 10 Dec 2004
  26. Mwakalila S, Feyen J, Wyseure G (2002) The influence of physical catchment properties on baseflow in semi-arid environments. J Arid Environ 52:245–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Nathan RJ, McMahon TA (1990) Evaluation of automated techniques for base flow and recession analyses. Water Resour Res 26:1465–1473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rantz SE (1982) Measurement and computation of streamflow: volume 1. Measurement of Stage and Discharge. Geological Survey water-supply paper, 2175. Washington, U.S. G.P.OGoogle Scholar
  29. Silva AB, Neto AFS, Bertachini AC (1994) Potencial das águas subterrâneas do Quadrilátero Ferrífero (Groundwater potencial in the Quadrilátero Ferrífero region). In: ABAS, Congresso Brasileiro de Águas Subterrâneas, 8, Anais, pp 264–273 (in Portuguese)Google Scholar
  30. Smakhtin VU (2001) Low flow hydrology: a review. J Hydrol 240:147–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Snyder FF (1939) A conception of runoff-phenomena. Reports and papers, hydrology, AGU, 20: 725–738Google Scholar
  32. Tallaksen LM (1995) A review of baseflow recession analysis. J Hydrol 165:349–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Trainer FW, Watkins FA Jr (1974) Use of base-runoff recession curves to determine areal transmissivities in the upper Potomac River Basin. J Res USGS 2:125–131Google Scholar
  34. USAE (1999) Engineering and design—Groundwater hydrology, Department of the army, US army corps of engineers, Washington, Manual 1110-2-1421Google Scholar
  35. Valente OF, Gomes MA (2005) Conservação de nascentes (Spring conservation). Aprenda Fácil Editora, Viçosa (in Portuguese)Google Scholar
  36. Wahl KL, Wahl TL (1995) Determining the flow of Comal Spring at New Braunfels, Texas. Am Soc Civ Engineers 16–17:77–86Google Scholar
  37. Winter TC, Harvey JW, Franke OL, Alley WM (1998) Ground water and surface water—a single resource, USGS Circular 1139Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of GeologyOuro Preto Federal UniversityOuro PretoBrazil

Personalised recommendations