Advertisement

Indian Journal of Gastroenterology

, Volume 35, Issue 2, pp 83–90 | Cite as

Frequency, spectrum, and factors associated with fecal evacuation disorders among patients with chronic constipation referred to a tertiary care center in northern India

  • Uday C. Ghoshal
  • Abhai Verma
  • Asha Misra
Original Article

Abstract

Background

Data on fecal evacuation disorder (FED) causing chronic constipation (CC) is scanty in India.

Methods

Prospectively maintained data of 249 consecutive patients with CC (Rome III) referred for investigations were retrospectively analyzed.

Results

Of 249 patients (43.7 ± 16.2 years, 174 males), 135/242 (55.8 %), 57/249 (22.9 %), and 83/136 (61.0 %) had abnormal balloon expulsion test (>200 g), anorectal manometry [>100 mmHg resting pressure (n = 4), >167 mmHg squeeze pressure (n = 46), and both (n = 7)], and defecography (anorectal angle not opening by >15° during defecation, perineal descent ≥4 cm, and/or rectocele), respectively. Though 181/249 (72.6 %) had one test abnormality, 86/249 (34 %) had FED (greater than or equal to two abnormalities), 44/65 (67.6 %) of whom had a defecation index ≤1.4. Rome III criteria for irritable bowel syndrome were equally fulfilled by patients with and without FED [74/83 (89 %) vs. 117/144 (81.2 %); p = ns]. On univariate analysis, straining duration, prolonged straining [≥30 min; 21/39 (53.8 %) vs. 15/65 (23.1 %); p = 0.002], incomplete evacuation [75/77 (97.4 %) vs. 95/114 (83.3 %); p = 0.004], and >3 stools/week [60/75 (80 %) vs. 76/128 (60 %); p = 0.004] were commoner among the FED patients though age, gender, symptom duration, mucus, manual evacuation, and stool forms were comparable. Resting and squeeze pressures and balloon volume at maximum tolerable limit were higher, and the sphincter tended to be shorter in FED. Prolonged straining, incomplete evacuation, and squeeze pressure were significant on multivariate analysis. Manometry and defecography abnormalities were commoner among the female FED patients.

Conclusion

FED is not uncommon, which fulfills the Rome III criteria for IBS, and prolonged straining may be suggestive; abnormal defecography and manometry are commoner in female.

Keywords

Anorectal manometry Chronic constipation Functional gastrointestinal disorders Irritable bowel syndrome 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Mr. Raghunath of the Gastrointestinal Pathophysiology and Motility Laboratory at SGPGI, Lucknow, for his technical support.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

UCG, AB, and AM declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethics statement

The authors declare that the study was performed in a manner to conform with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2000 and 2008, concerning Human and Animal Rights, and the authors followed the policy concerning informed consent as shown on Springer.com.

References

  1. 1.
    Heaton KW, Radvan J, Cripps H, Mountford RA, Braddon FE, Hughes AO. Defection frequency and timing, and stool form in the general population: a prospective study. Gut. 1992;33:818–24.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Talley NJ, O’Keefe EA, Zinsmeister AR, Melton LJ 3rd. Prevalence of gastrointestinal symptoms in the elderly: a population-based study. Gastroenterology. 1992;102:895–901.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sonnenberg A, Koch TR. Epidemiology of constipation in the United States. Dis Colon Rectum. 1989;32:1–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Pare P, Ferrazzi S, Thompson WG, Irvine EJ, Rance L. An epidemiological survey of constipation in Canada: definitions, rates, demographics, and predictors of health care seeking. Am J Gastroenterol. 2001;96:3130–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Makharia GK, Verma AK, Amarchand R, et al. Prevalence of irritable bowel syndrome: a community based study from northern India. J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2011;17:82–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gwee KA, Ghoshal UC, Gonlachanvit S, et al. Primary care management of chronic constipation in Asia: the ANMA Chronic Constipation Tool. J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2013;19:149–60.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Surrenti E, Rath DM, Pemberton JH, Camilleri M. Audit of constipation in a tertiary referral gastroenterology practice. Am J Gastroenterol. 1995;90:1471–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ghoshal UC. Review of pathogenesis and management of constipation. Trop Gastroenterol. 2007;28:91–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Andromanakos N, Skandalakis P, Troupis T, Filippou D. Constipation of anorectal outlet obstruction: pathophysiology, evaluation and management. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006;21:638–46.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Szojda MM, Tanis E, Mulder CJ, Felt-Bersma RJ. Referral for anorectal function evaluation is indicated in 65 % and beneficial in 92 % of patients. World J Gastroenterol. 2008;14:272–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Drossman DA. Guidelines for use of the multi-dimensional clinical profile. In: Multi-Dimensional Clinical Profile (MDCP) For The Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders (1st edition). North Carolina; Rome Foundation, 2015; pp. 7–14.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bharucha AE, Dorn SD, Lembo A, Pressman A. American Gastroenterological Association medical position statement on constipation. Gastroenterology. 2013;144:211–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bharucha AE, Pemberton JH, Locke GR 3rd. American Gastroenterological Association technical review on constipation. Gastroenterology. 2013;144:218–38.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Shah N, Baijal R, Kumar P, et al. Clinical and investigative assessment of constipation: a study from a referral center in western India. Indian J Gastroenterol. 2014;33:530–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Higgins PD, Johanson JF. Epidemiology of constipation in North America: a systematic review. Am J Gastroenterol. 2004;99:750–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Adeyemo MA, Spiegel BM, Chang L. Meta-analysis: do irritable bowel syndrome symptoms vary between men and women? Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2010;32:738–55.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ghoshal UC, Abraham P, Bhatt C, et al. Epidemiological and clinical profile of irritable bowel syndrome in India: report of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology Task Force. Indian J Gastroenterol. 2008;27:22–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Schmulson M, Corazziari E, Ghoshal UC, et al. A four-country comparison of healthcare systems, implementation of diagnostic criteria, and treatment availability for functional gastrointestinal disorders: a report of the Rome Foundation Working Team on cross-cultural, multinational research. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2014;26:1368–85.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Grotz RL, Pemberton JH, Talley NJ, Rath DM, Zinsmeister AR. Discriminant value of psychological distress, symptom profiles, and segmental colonic dysfunction in outpatients with severe idiopathic constipation. Gut. 1994;35:798–802.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Karlbom U, Pahlman L, Nilsson S, Graf W. Relationships between defecographic findings, rectal emptying, and colonic transit time in constipated patients. Gut. 1995;36:907–12.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lewis SJ, Heaton KW. Stool form scale as a useful guide to intestinal transit time. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1997;32:920–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Korah AT, Misra A, Kumar S, Ghoshal UC. Manometric spectrum of fecal incontinence in a tertiary care center in northern India. Trop Gastroenterol. 2010;31:165–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Rao SS, Mudipalli RS, Stessman M, Zimmerman B. Investigation of the utility of colorectal function tests and Rome II criteria in dyssynergic defecation (anismus). Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2004;16:589–96.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Rao SS, Welcher KD, Leistikow JS. Obstructive defecation: a failure of rectoanal coordination. Am J Gastroenterol. 1998;93:1042–50.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lee BE, Kim GH. How to perform and interpret balloon expulsion test. J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2014;20:407–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kim AY. How to interpret a functional or motility test—defecography. J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2011;17:416–20.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Bharucha AE, Wald A, Enck P, Rao S. Functional anorectal disorders. Gastroenterology. 2006;130:1510–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Chitkara DK, Bredenoord AJ, Cremonini F, et al. The role of pelvic floor dysfunction and slow colonic transit in adolescents with refractory constipation. Am J Gastroenterol. 2004;99:1579–84.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Oncu K, Ozel AM, Demirturk L, Gurbuz AK, Yazgan Y, Kizilkaya E. Determination of the frequency of dyssynergic defecation and patient characteristics in patients with functional constipation. Turk J Gastroenterol. 2010;21:372–80.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Nyam DC, Pemberton JH, Ilstrup DM, Rath DM. Long-term results of surgery for chronic constipation. Dis Colon Rectum. 1997;40:273–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Gonlachanvit S, Patcharatrakul T. Causes of idiopathic constipation in Thai patients: associations between the causes and constipation symptoms as defined in the Rome II criteria. J Med Assoc Thai. 2004;87 Suppl 2:S22–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Emmanuel AV, Kamm MA. Response to a behavioural treatment, biofeedback, in constipated patients is associated with improved gut transit and autonomic innervation. Gut. 2001;49:214–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Rao SS, Tuteja AK, Vellema T, Kempf J, Stessman M. Dyssynergic defecation: demographics, symptoms, stool patterns, and quality of life. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2004;38:680–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Lee HJ, Jung KW, Han S, et al. Normal values for high-resolution anorectal manometry/topography in a healthy Korean population and the effects of gender and body mass index. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2014;26:529–37.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Kepenekci I, Keskinkilic B, Akinsu F, et al. Prevalence of pelvic floor disorders in the female population and the impact of age, mode of delivery, and parity. Dis Colon Rectum. 2011;54:85–94.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Park SK, Myung SJ, Jung KW, et al. Biofeedback therapy for female patients with constipation caused by radical hysterectomy or vaginal delivery. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013;28:1133–40.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Savoye-Collet C, Savoye G, Koning E, Leroi AM, Dacher JN. Gender influence on defecographic abnormalities in patients with posterior pelvic floor disorders. World J Gastroenterol. 2010;16:462–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Panigrahi MK, Kar SK, Ghoshal UC, Singh SP. Defecation frequency and stool form in a coastal eastern Indian population. J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2013;19:374–80.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Zaslavsky C, De Barros SG, Gruber AC, MacIel AC, Da Silveira TR. Chronic functional constipation in adolescents: clinical findings and motility studies. J Adolesc Health. 2004;34:517–22.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Ratuapli S, Bharucha AE, Harvey D, Zinsmeister AR. Comparison of rectal balloon expulsion test in seated and left lateral positions. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2013;25:e813–20.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Minguez M, Herreros B, Sanchiz V, et al. Predictive value of the balloon expulsion test for excluding the diagnosis of pelvic floor dyssynergia in constipation. Gastroenterology. 2004;126:57–62.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Bharucha AE. Anorectal disorders. In: Spiller R, Grundy D, editors. Pathophysiology of the Enteric Nervous System: a Basis for Understanding Functional Diseases. Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Oxford, UK. doi:  10.1002/9780470760307. Chapter 13; 2008; pp. 161–75.
  43. 43.
    Rao SS. Dyssynergic defecation and biofeedback therapy. Gastroenterol Clin N Am. 2008;37:569–86. viii.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Society of Gastroenterology 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of GastroenterologySanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical SciencesLucknowIndia

Personalised recommendations