Indian Journal of Gastroenterology

, Volume 29, Issue 4, pp 149–151 | Cite as

Synchronous liver metastasis in colorectal cancer in Sri Lanka

  • Rohan Chaminda SiriwardanaEmail author
  • S. Ruwan E. Wijesuriya
  • Sumudu K. Kumarage
  • Kemal I. Deen
Original Article



To assess the incidence of synchronous colorectal liver metastasis in patients referred to a tertiary referral center in Sri Lanka and to evaluate the differences in the clinicopathological features of patients with and without synchronous metastasis.


Records of 438 patients were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were classified into metastatic group (n = 34, 8%) and non metastastatic group (n = 404, 92%). In the two groups macroscopic features compared were: tumor size (2 cm, 2–5 cm, and >5 cm), site of primary tumor and side of liver involved. Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels were recorded. At microscopy, tumor differentiation, invasion and nodal status were evaluated.


The rectum was the primary site of the tumor in a majority (60%) of patients. There was no difference in the distribution of the primary site and size of the tumor, pathological stage, lymphatic infiltration and the degree of tumor differentiation in two groups (p > 0.05). Patients with metastasis had higher levels of CEA, higher frequency of vascular infiltration and N3 nodes involved (p < 0.05).


The incidence of synchronous colorectal liver metastasis seems to be lower in our patients. Association of higher CEA level, advanced nodal stage and presence of vascular invasion needs to be further assessed with risk of developing metachronous liver metastasis.


Colonic neoplasms Liver neoplasms/surgery 


  1. 1.
    Ferlay J, Bray F, Pisani P, Parkin DM. GLOBOCAN 2002: cancer incidence, mortality and prevalence worldwide, version 2.0. IARC Cancer Base number 5. Lyon: IARC; 2004.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Leporrier J, Maurel J, Chiche L, Bara S, Segol P, Launoy G. A population-based study of the incidence, management and prognosis of hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2006;93:465–74.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Minagawa M, Yamamoto J, Miwa S, et al. Selection criteria for simultaneous resection in patients with synchronous liver metastasis. Arch Surg. 2006;141:1006–12.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Greene FL, Page D, Fleming I, eds. Colon and rectum. In: American Joint Committee on Cancer. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual, 6th edn. Springer, New York, 2002. pp. 113–24.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tsai MS, Su YH, Ho MC, et al. Clinicopathological features and prognosis in respectable synchronous and metachronous colorectal liver metastasis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007;14:786–94.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Perera T, Wijesuriya RE, Suraweera PHR, et al. The prevalence of colorectal cancer and survival in patients from the Gampaha District, North Colombo region. Ceylon Med J. 2008;53:17–21.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Koo JH, Kin S, Wong C, et al. Clinical and pathologic outcomes of colorectal cancer in a multi-ethnic population. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008;6:1016–21.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Norwood MG, Mann CD, Hemingway D, Miller AS. Colorectal cancer: presentation and outcome in British South Asians. Colorectal Dis. 2009;11:745–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Society of Gastroenterology 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rohan Chaminda Siriwardana
    • 1
    Email author
  • S. Ruwan E. Wijesuriya
    • 1
  • Sumudu K. Kumarage
    • 1
  • Kemal I. Deen
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of SurgeryUniversity Surgical UnitKelaniyaSri Lanka

Personalised recommendations