Advertisement

Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery

, Volume 18, Issue 1, pp 147–152 | Cite as

Effect of Intrasocket Application of Manuka Honey on Postsurgical Pain of Impacted Mandibular Third Molars Surgery: Split-Mouth Randomized Controlled Trial

  • Nuraldeen M. Al-KhanatiEmail author
  • Yasser Al-Moudallal
Original Article
  • 114 Downloads

Abstract

Background and Purpose

Sufficient evidence exists recommending the use of honey in the management of wounds. Studies revealed that the healing effect of honey could be classified by its antibacterial and anti-inflammatory properties of its components. Since surgical extraction of impacted molars is one of the most common operations in the oral cavity and the postoperative pain disturbing the patient may reduce the quality of health service, this study aimed to assess the analgesic potential of Manuka honey application into the extraction socket of impacted mandibular third molars.

Methods

This randomized split-mouth controlled study included 33 patients undergoing impacted bilateral lower third molars surgery under local anesthesia (n = 66). Randomization was carried out by coin flipping. One of the two impacted third molars was assigned to treatment group (Manuka honey applied just before suturing), other side to control group (nothing applied). Postsurgical pain was evaluated using visual analogue scale (VAS) of faces 7 days after extraction. The total analgesic dose used was also evaluated.

Results

In treatment group, postoperative VAS scores were significantly lower compared to that in control group regarding first and second days postoperatively (P < 0.05). Total analgesic intake in the control group was significantly higher (P = 0.0001).

Conclusion

This study demonstrated that intrasocket application of Manuka honey after surgical extraction of impacted lower third molar is an effective method for reducing acute postsurgical pain.

Keywords

Manuka honey Impaction Third molar surgery Pain Postoperative analgesia 

Notes

Funding

This study was funded by Damascus University, Syria (Grant Number: 749).

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of institutional and national research committee and with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its amendments.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. 1.
    Molan PC, Betts JA (2004) Clinical usage of honey as a wound dressing: an update. J Wound Care 13(9):353–356.  https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2004.13.9.26708 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Khan FR, Ul Abadin Z, Rauf N (2007) Honey: nutritional and medicinal value. Int J Clin Pract 61(10):1705–1707.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-1241.2007.01417.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Moore OA, Smith LA, Campbell F, Seers K, McQuay HJ, Moore RA (2001) Systematic review of the use of honey as a wound dressing. BMC Complement Altern Med 1:2.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6882-1-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wijesinghe M, Weatherall M, Perrin K, Beasley R (2009) Honey in the treatment of burns: a systematic review and meta-analysis of its efficacy. N Z Med J 122(1295):47–60 PMID: 19648986 Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Al-Waili N, Salom K, Al-Ghamdi AA (2011) Honey for wound healing, ulcers, and burns; data supporting its use in clinical practice. Sci World J 11:766–787.  https://doi.org/10.1100/tsw.2011.78 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Yaghoobi R, Kazerouni A, Kazerouni O (2013) Evidence for clinical use of honey in wound healing as an anti-bacterial, anti-inflammatory anti-oxidant and anti-viral agent: a review. Jundishapur J Nat Pharm Prod 8(3):100–104. PMCID: PMC3941901Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gulati S, Qureshi A, Srivastava A, Kataria K, Kumar P, Ji AB (2014) A prospective randomized study to compare the effectiveness of honey dressing versus povidone iodine dressing in chronic wound healing. Indian J Surg 76(3):193–198.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-012-0682-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hwang SH, Song JN, Jeong YM, Lee YJ, Kang JM (2016) The efficacy of honey for ameliorating pain after tonsillectomy: a meta-analysis. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 273(4):811–818.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-014-3433-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Boroumand P, Zamani MM, Saeedi M, Rouhbakhshfar O, Hosseini Motlagh SR, Aarabi Moghaddam F (2013) Post tonsillectomy pain: Can honey reduce the analgesic requirements? Anesth Pain Med 3(1):198–202.  https://doi.org/10.5812/aapm.9246 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Singh V, Pal US, Singh R, Soni N (2014) Honey a sweet approach to alveolar osteitis: a study. Natl J Maxillofac Surg 5(1):31–34.  https://doi.org/10.4103/0975-5950.140166 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mandal MD, Mandal S (2011) Honey: its medicinal property and antibacterial activity. Asian Pac J Trop Biomed 1(2):154–160.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S2221-1691(11)60016-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Simon A, Traynor K, Santos K, Blaser G, Bode U, Molan P (2009) Medical honey for wound care—still the ‘latest resort’? Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 6(2):165–173.  https://doi.org/10.1093/ecam/nem175 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Schneider M, Coyle S, Warnock M, Gow I, Fyfe L (2013) Anti-microbial activity and composition of manuka and portobello honey. Phytother Res 27(8):1162–1168.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ptr.4844 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kwakman PH, Zaat SA (2012) Antibacterial components of honey. IUBMB Life 64(1):48–55.  https://doi.org/10.1002/iub.578 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mavric E, Wittmann S, Barth G, Henle T (2008) Identification and quantification of methylglyoxal as the dominant antibacterial constituent of Manuka (Leptospermum scoparium) honeys from New Zealand. Mol Nutr Food Res 52(4):483–489.  https://doi.org/10.1002/mnfr.200700282 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rathnam A, Madan N, Madan N (2010) The language of pain: a short study. Contemp Clin Dent 1(3):142–145.  https://doi.org/10.4103/0976-237X.72778 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Pippi R (2017) Post-surgical clinical monitoring of soft tissue wound healing in periodontal and implant surgery. Int J Med Sci. 14(8):721–728.  https://doi.org/10.7150/ijms.19727 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Schneider LA, Korber A, Grabbe S, Dissemond J (2007) Influence of pH on wound-healing: a new perspective for wound-therapy? Arch Dermatol Res 298(9):413–420.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00403-006-0713-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Molan PC (1999) The role of honey in the management of wounds. J Wound Care 8(8):415–418.  https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.1999.8.8.25904 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Schmidlin PR, English H, Duncan W, Belibasakis GN, Thurnheer T (2014) Antibacterial potential of Manuka honey against three oral bacteria in vitro. Swiss Dent J 124(9):922–924 PMID: 25253413 Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Malhotra R, Ziahosseini K, Poitelea C, Litwin A, Sagili S (2017) Effect of Manuka honey on eyelid wound healing: a randomized controlled trial. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 33(4):268–272.  https://doi.org/10.1097/IOP.0000000000000743 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Owoyele BV, Oladejo RO, Ajomale K, Ahmed RO, Mustapha A (2014) Analgesic and anti-inflammatory effects of honey: the involvement of autonomic receptors. Metab Brain Dis 29(1):167–173.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11011-013-9458-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Tonks AJ, Dudley E, Porter NG, Parton J, Brazier J, Smith EL, Tonks A (2007) A 5.8-kDa component of manuka honey stimulates immune cells via TLR4. J Leukoc Biol 82(5):1147–1155.  https://doi.org/10.1189/jlb.1106683 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons of India 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dental MedicineDamascus UniversityDamascusSyria

Personalised recommendations