Advertisement

Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery

, Volume 18, Issue 1, pp 61–64 | Cite as

Mandibular Torus Harvesting for Sinus Augmentation: Two-Year Follow-Up

  • Inci Rana KaracaEmail author
  • Dilara Nur Ozturk
  • Huseyin Ozan Akinci
Case Report
  • 32 Downloads

Abstract

Maxillary sinus grafting is a commonly used treatment alternative in cases with insufficient bone height to enable insertion of implants in the posterior maxilla. It is commonly carried out with autogenous grafts, biomaterials or both. Autogenous bone grafts are considered gold standard for this procedure; however, due to donor site morbidity, it is not as commonly used as other biomaterials. Mandibular tori are hyperostoses on the lingual side of the mandible in the premolar region. This a case in which mandibular tori were used for a sinus augmentation procedure. The patient was then followed up for 2 years with no complaints, or objective symptoms.

Keywords

Autogenous graft Implantology Mandibular torus Sinus augmentation Sinus lifting 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This manuscript has been accepted as a poster presentation in FDI World Dental Congress 2017, Madrid, on August 29–September 1.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from the patient mentioned in this case report.

References

  1. 1.
    Rasmusson L, Sennerby L (2010) Implantology. In: Andersson L, Kahnberg KE, Pogrel MA (eds) Oral and maxillofacial surgery. Blackwell Publishing, West Sussex, pp 341–355Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kahnberg KE (2010) Treatment of bone-deficient ridges in implant rehabilitation. In: Andersson L, Kahnberg KE, Pogrel MA (eds) Oral and maxillofacial surgery. Blackwell Publishing, West Sussex, pp 405–414Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Neiva RF, Neiva GF, Wang HL (2006) Utilization of mandibular tori for alveolar ridge augmentation and maxillary sinus lifting: a case report. Quintessence Int 37:131–137Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zizzari VL, Zara S, Tetè G, Vinci R, Gherlone E, Cataldi A (2016) Biologic and clinical aspects of integration of different bone substitutes in oral surgery: a literature review. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 122:392–402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hassan KS, Al-Agal A, Abdel-Hady AI, Swelam WM, Elgazzar RF (2015) Mandibular tori as bone grafts: an alternative treatment for periodontal osseous defects—clinical, radiographic and histologic morphology evaluation. J Contemp Dent Pract 16:192–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mendes da Silva J, dos Anjos Pérola, Braga Pires C, Angélica Mendes Rodrigues L et al (2017) Influence of mandibular tori on stomatognathic system function. Cranio 35:30–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Auškalnis A, Rutkūnas V, Bernhardt O, Šidlauskas M, Šalomskienė L, Basevičienė N (2015) Multifactorial etiology of torus mandibularis: study of twins. Stomatologija 17:35–40Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hassan KS, Alagl AS, Abdel-Hady A (2012) Torus mandibularis bone chips combined with platelet rich plasma gel for treatment of intrabony osseous defects clinical and radiographic evaluation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 41:1519–1526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wang C, Huang C, Grossman SH, Pourati J (2016) Vertical ridge augmentation with mandibular lingual torus block graft. J Oral Implantol 42:369–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rastogi K, Verma SK, Bhushan R (2013) Surgical removal of mandibular tori and its use as an autogenous graft. BMJ Case Rep.  https://doi.org/10.1136/bcr-2012-008297 Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Santhanakrishnan M, Rangarao S (2014) Mandibular tori: a source of autogenous bone graft. J Indian Soc Periodontol 18(6):767–771CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons of India 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Dentistry Department of Oral and Maxillofacial SurgeryGazi UniversityAnkaraTurkey

Personalised recommendations