Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery

, Volume 18, Issue 1, pp 34–39 | Cite as

Reconstruction of Acquired Frontal Bone Defects Using Titanium Mesh Implants: A Retrospective Study

  • Chandrashekhar Chattopadhyay
Clinical Paper



Frontal bone deformities can be acquired due to trauma or ablative tumor resection surgeries and osteomyelitis. It may also occur due to congenital malformations. Repair of these defects have long been a challenge to oral and maxillofacial surgeons. We report our experience in the reconstruction of acquired frontal bone defects by titanium mesh implant.

Patients and Methods

Titanium mesh was used for reconstruction in 35 patients (18–55 years age-group) (34 males and 01 females) of acquired frontal bone defects secondary to trauma (RTA). All these patients have been referred to author by Department of Neurosurgery of the institute of Affiliation.


All these cases acquired defects as a result of trauma. Follow-up ranged from 12 to 18 months after the reconstruction. Patients were followed up for the progress of healing, stability of implants, infection, wound dehiscence, discharging sinus, exposure of implants, collections, patient satisfaction regarding esthetics and reaction to thermal changes. No postoperative complications were found.


In reconstruction of frontal bone defects, titanium mesh gives satisfactory results.


Frontal bone defects Reconstructions Titanium implants 



Prof. (Col) P Suresh Menon, Department of Neurosurgery and Anesthesia. Dr S.N. Medical College Jodhpur.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The author declares that they have no conflict of interest.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.


  1. 1.
    Haug RH, Adams JM, Conforti PJ, Likavek MJ (1994) Cranial fractures associated with facial fractures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 52:729–733CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Zanotti B, Zingaretti N, Verlicchi A, Robiony M, Alfieri A, Parodi PC (2016) Cranioplasty: review of materials. J Craniofac Surg 27(8):2061–2072CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Williams LR, Fan KF, Bentley RP (2015) Custom-made titanium cranioplasty: early and late complications of 151 cranioplasties and review of the literature. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 44(5):599–608CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lin AY, Kinsella CR Jr, Rottgers SA, Smith DM, Grunwaldt LJ, Cooper GM, Losee JE (2012) Custom porous polyethylene implants for large-scale pediatric skull reconstruction: early outcomes. J Craniofac Surg 23(1):67–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Manson PN (1990) Facial injuries. In: McCarthy JG (ed) Plastic surgery. WB Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 867–1141Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    McCarthy J, Zide BM (1984) The spectrum of calvarial bone grafting: introduction of the vascularized calvarial bone flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 74:10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hunter PD, Pelofsky S (1995) Classification of autogenous skull grafts in cranial reconstruction. J Craniomaxillofac Trauma 14:8–15Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cohen SR, Kawamoto HK (1992) Analysis and results of treatment of established pest traumatic facial deformities. Plast Reconstr Surg 90(4):574–584CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Van Gool AY (1985) Preformed polymethyl methacrylate cranioplasties. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 13:2–8Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Brown KE (1970) Fabrication of an alloplastic cranioimplant. J Prosthet Dent 24:213–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sabin H, Karvounis P (1969) The neurosurgeon-dentist team in cranioplasty. JADA 79:1183–1188Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Replogle RE, Lanzino G, Francel P (1996) Acrylic cranioplasty using miniplate struts. Neurosurgery 39:747–749CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Galicich JH, Hovind KH (1967) Stainless steel mesh-acrylic cranioplasty technical note. J Neurosurg 27:376–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Engstrand T, Kihlström L, Lundgren K, Trobos M, Engqvist H, Thomsen P (2015) Bioceramic implant induces bone healing of cranial defects. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 3(8):e491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Malis LI (1989) Titanium mesh and acrylic cranioplasty. Neurosurgery 25:351–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Patel MF, Langdon ID (1991) Titanium mesh osteosynthesis: a fast and adaptable method of semirigid fixation. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 29:316–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Simpson D (1954) Titanium in cranioplasty. Br Med J 11(2):19–225Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mukherjee S, Thakur B, Haq I, Hettige S, Martin AJ (2014) Complications of titanium cranioplasty—a retrospective analysis of 174 patients. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 156(5):989–998CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hill CS, Luoma AM, Wilson SR, Kitchen N (2012) Titanium cranioplasty and the prediction of complications. Br J Neurosurg 26(6):832–837. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons of India 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of General DentistryDr S.N. Medical CollegeJodhpurIndia

Personalised recommendations