Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery

, Volume 11, Issue 2, pp 166–170 | Cite as

Role of Collagen Impregnated with Dexamethasone and Placentrix in Patients with Oral Submucous Fibrosis

  • Y. Raghavendra Reddy
  • N. Srinath
  • H. Nandakumar
  • M. Rajini Kanth
Original paper



To evaluate the versatility of the collagen membrane as both drug carrier and biologic dressing material to cover the raw wounds created after the surgical excision of fibrotic bands in oral submucous fibrosis.

Materials and Methods

The study comprises of ten patients. The patients of age group 20 to 50 years were selected. The collagen is reconstituted by injecting with dexamethasone and placentrix solution leaving a small overlap on to the remaining mucous membrane and the graft is sutured. Preoperative and post operative assessment was done regarding the improvement in mouth opening, decrease in burning sensation, change in colour of oral mucosa and clinically grading the extent of lesion.


The results were found appreciable in seven patients while in the remaining three patients it showed relapse because of inadequate physiotherapy. All the ten patients were comfortable with intra oral collagen grafting. The collagen remained moist and supple intraorally, and remained in close contact with the underlying tissues, providing a strong mechanical barrier. The material was effective in attaining haemostasis, relieving pain and preventing extensive contracture.


In this study of short duration, the nature of collagen membrane was observed as both biological dressing material and drug carrier. It was found as a very suitable alternative to the other graft material mentioned for the repair of defects in the mucous membrane created by surgical excision of fibrous bands in oral submucous fibrosis.


Oral submucous fibrosis Collagen membrane Dexamethasone Placentrix 


  1. 1.
    Cox SC, Walker DM (1996) Oral submucous fibrosis. A review. Aust Dent J 41(5):294–299PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lai DR, Chen HR (1995) Clinical evaluation of different treatment methods for oral submucousfibrosis. A 10-year experience with 150 cases. J Oral Pathol Med 24:402–406PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Khanna JN, Andrade NN (1995) Oral submucous fibrosis: a new concept in surgical management. Int J Oral Maxillofacial Surg 24:433–439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gupta Dinesh Chandra S, Dolas Rameeshwar S, Iqbal Ali (1992) Treatment modalities in oral submucous fibrosis: how they stand today? study of 600 cases. Ind J Oral Maxillofac Surg 7:43–47Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Alexander John M, Richmond JL (1978) Microfibrillar collagen (Avitene) a haemostatic agent in experimental oral wounds. Journal of oral surgery 36:202–205PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rananjaneyulu P, Prabhakara Rao BS (1980) Sub mucous fibrosis—new treatment. J Indian Dent Assoc 52:379–380Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sanjay Rastoji, Mancy Modi, Brijesh Sathian (2009) The efficacy of collagen membrane as biodegradable wound dressing material for surgical defects of oral mucosa: a prospective study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 67:1600–1606CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons of India 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Y. Raghavendra Reddy
    • 1
  • N. Srinath
    • 1
  • H. Nandakumar
    • 1
  • M. Rajini Kanth
    • 2
  1. 1.Krishnadevaraya College of Dental Sciences, Hunsamarana HalliBangaloreIndia
  2. 2.G Pulla Reddy Dental CollegeKurnoolIndia

Personalised recommendations