Mandibular Osteosynthesis: A Comparative Evaluation of Two Different Fixation Systems Using 2.0 mm Titanium Miniplates and 3-D Locking Plates

  • Manoj Goyal
  • Karan Marya
  • Sonia Chawla
  • Richa Pandey
Comparative Study



To compare and evaluate postoperative complications and treatment outcome in mandibular fracture fixation using 2.0 mm titanium miniplates and 3-D locking plates.


Thirty patients were divided randomly into two groups of 15 each (including comminuted and malunited fractures). Group A was treated with open reduction internal fixation using 2.0 mm miniplates and group B with 3-D locking plates.


A total of five complications were observed in four patients: implant exposure and infection in miniplate group and postoperative neurosensory deficit, implant failure and implant exposure in 3-D group.


For fractures in symphysis and parasymphysis region, severely displaced angle fractures and for comminuted fractures 3-D locking plate could be a better option. In the angle and body region a single miniplate fixed according to Champy’s technique is easy to place with less surgical time, less surgical trauma, is more economical and has similar clinical results.


3-D locking plate Mandibular fracture Miniplates Malunited 


  1. 1.
    Spiessl B (1972) Rigid internal fixation of fractures of lower jaw. Reconstr Surg Traumtol 13:124–140Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Champy M, Lodde JP, Schmitt R et al (1978) Mandibular osteosynthesis by miniature screwed plates via a buccal approach. J Maxillofac Surg 6:14–21PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Michelet FX, Deymes J, Dessus B (1973) Osteosynthesis with miniaturized screwed plates in maxillofacial surgery. J Maxillofac Surg 1(2):79–84PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cawood JL (1985) Small plate osteosynthesis of mandibular fractures. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 23:77–91PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kroon HM, Mathison M, Cordey JR, Rahn BR (1991) The use of miniplates in mandibular fractures. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 19:199PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Farmand M (1995) Three-dimensional plate fixation of fractures and osteotomies. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 3(1):39–56Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gutwald R, Alpert B, Schmelzeisen R (2003) Principle & stability of locking plates. Keio J Med 52:21PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Coletti DP, Caccamese JF, Norby C et al (2007) Comparative analysis of the threaded & tapered locking reconstruction plates. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 65:2587PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Guimond C, Johnson J, Marchena J (2005) Fixation of mandibular angle fractures with a 2.0 mm 3-dimensional curved angle strut plate. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 63:209PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Collins CP, Leonard GP, Tolas A et al (2004) A prospective randomized clinical trial comparing 2.0 mm locking plates to 2.0 mm standard plates in treatment of mandible fractures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 62:1392PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ellis E, Graham J (2002) Use of a 2.0-mm locking plate/screw system for mandibular fracture surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 60:642PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wittenberg JM, Mukherjee DP, Smith BR, Kruse RN (1997) Biomechanical evaluation of new fixation devices for mandibular angle fractures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 26:68–73PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bui P, Demian N, Beetar P (2009) Infection rate in mandibular angle fractures treated with a 2.0 mm 8-hole curved strut plate. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 67:804–808PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Parmar S, Menat S, Raghani M, Kapadia T (2007) Three dimensional miniplate rigid fixation in fracture mandible. J Maxillofac Oral Surg 6(2):14Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons of India 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Manoj Goyal
    • 1
  • Karan Marya
    • 1
  • Sonia Chawla
    • 1
  • Richa Pandey
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Oral & Maxillofacial SurgerySantosh Dental & Medical College HospitalsGhaziabad (NCR), DelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations