Performance evaluations in optical and wireless networks for CONDOR project

  • Iness Ahriz
  • Jean-Michel DouinEmail author
  • Frédéric Lemoine
  • Anne Wei
Original Research


Wireless and optical networks are widely used nowadays. These networks offer a high throughput thanks to their optical link and allow the development of multiuser applications. Because the network performance is an important issue to provide services to a great number of users while assuring user’s quality of service requirements, CONDOR (CONtribution à la Diffusion de l’histOiRe du traitement de l’information à l’aide du réseau de demain) project aims to evaluate the wireless and optical networks’ performances in terms of link quality, throughput, jitter and delay. Our results show that a high throughput in optical and wireless networks supports a big load through the launched mobile applications while P2P wireless network connections upset some video applications.


Network performance Mobile applications P2P wireless network 



This work on CONDOR project would not take place without our colleague Anne Wei commitment who left us abruptly this year. Authors present many thanks to Samia Bouzefrane for her valuable advices and her support.


  1. Agyemang B, Xu Y, Sulemana N, Hu H (2018) Resource-oriented architecture toward efficient device management for the Internet of Things. J Ambient Intell Humaniz Comput. Google Scholar
  2. Biswas S, et al. (2015) Large-scale measurements of wireless network behavior, In: ACM SIGCOMM2015, 13 pagesGoogle Scholar
  3. Bozinovic N, Yue Y, Ren YX, Tur M, Kristensen P, Huang H, Willner AE, Ramachandran S (2013) Terabit-scale orbital angular momentum mode division multiplexing in fibers. Science 340:1545–1548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chen X, Jin R et al (2012) Network performance of smart mobile handhelds in a university campus WiFi network, ACM, IMC2012, Boston,pp 14Google Scholar
  5. Dianu MD, Riihijarvi J, Petrova M (2014) Measurement-based study of the performance of IEEE 802.11ac in an indoor environment, IEEE ICC 2014, SydneyGoogle Scholar
  6. Doshi SR et al (2007) Wireless network testing and evalution using real-time emulation, Scalable Network Technologies, Los Angeles, pp 16Google Scholar
  7. Falaki H et al (2010) A first look at traffic on smartphone, ACM, IMC2010, Melbourne, pp 14Google Scholar
  8. Gai K, Qiu M, Zhao H, Tao L, Zong Z (2016) Dynamic energy-aware cloudlet-based mobile cloud computing model for green computing. J Netw Comput Appl 59:46–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. HTC Nexus 9, Accessed 17 December 2018
  10. Kenteris M, Gavalas D, Economou D (2008) Evaluation of mobile tourist guides, WSKS 2008. Athens, 24–26Google Scholar
  11. Karrer R, Sabharwal A, Keigntly E (2004) Enabling large-scale wireless broadband: the case for TAPs. SIGCOMM Comput Commun Rev 34(1):27–32. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Louvre (2016) The Louvre-Nintendo 3DS audio guide, Louvre’s document, p 7.
  13. Le Vinh T, Pallavali R, Houacine F, Bouzefrane S (2016) Energy efficiency in mobile cloud computing architectures, In: The IEEE 4th international conference on future internet of things and cloud, pp. 326–331, Austria.
  14. Lounis M, Bounceur A, Euler R, Pottier B (2018) Estimation of energy consumption through parallel computing in wireless sensor networks. J Ambient Intell Humaniz Comput. Google Scholar
  15. Rani P et al (2014) A review on wireless propagation models. IJEIT, 3(11):11Google Scholar
  16. Simek M, Botta M, Mraz L, Denkovski D (2013) Evaluation of PHY layer throughput of ultra wide band IEEE 802.15.4a technology, In: Telecommunications and signal processing (TSP) 2013 36th international conference on, pp. 105–110Google Scholar
  17. Samsung Galaxy S, Accessed 17 Dec 2018
  18. Raychaudhuri D et al (2005) Overview of the ORBIT radio grid testbed for evalution of next-generation wireless networks protocols, In: IEEE WCNC 2005, pp 9Google Scholar
  19. Ullah N, Chowdhury MS, Khan P and Kwak KS (2010) Throughput limits of UWB based 802.15.4a. In: International conference on information and communication technology convergence, November 17–19, 2010, Jeju Island, KoreaGoogle Scholar
  20. Walters JP, Younge AJ, Kang D, Yao K (2014) GPU Passthrough performance: a comparison of KVM, Xen, VMWare ESXi, and LXC for CUDA and OpenCL Applications, In: 2014 IEEE 7th international conference on cloud computingGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Iness Ahriz
    • 1
  • Jean-Michel Douin
    • 1
    Email author
  • Frédéric Lemoine
    • 1
  • Anne Wei
    • 1
  1. 1.CEDRIC, Conservatoire National des Arts et MétiersParisFrance

Personalised recommendations