Advertisement

Multi-hop LoRaWAN uplink extension: specification and prototype implementation

  • José Dias
  • António GriloEmail author
Original Research

Abstract

The coverage of a LoRaWAN network in a city is greatly hampered by the harsh propagation environment. Sensors are sometimes placed under the ground or in places with strong electromagnetic attenuation. Also, for users who have a contract with a network operator, installing another gateway to improve coverage of blind spots is not an option. In other cases, there is no or very weak connectivity (e.g. basements). In the present work, we design and implement a multi-hop uplink solution compatible with the LoRaWAN specification, which can act as an extension to already deployed gateways. End nodes transmit data messages to intermediate nodes, which relay them to gateways by choosing routes based on a simplified version of destination-sequenced distance vector routing. The routing protocol was successfully implemented and was assessed using a linear and bottleneck topology, where the packet reception rate (PRR) and throughput were measured. A carrier activity detection mechanism is also proposed. This paper presents the protocol specification and detailed description of a prototype implementation, as well as experimental performance results. On the bottleneck topology, it was observed that the PRR of each node did not significantly vary. On the linear topology, we observed that the throughput and PRR did not decrease considerably with the increase of hops. A listen-before talk multiple access mechanism is also proposed, which significantly reduces the probability of collision.

Keywords

LoRa LoRaWAN Multi-hop Routing 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was partially supported by Portuguese national funds through Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (FCT) with reference UID/CEC/50021/2013.

References

  1. Abdul-Qawy A, Srinivasulu T (2018) Sees: a scalable and energy-efficient scheme for green iot-based heterogeneous wireless nodes. J Ambient Intell Humaniz Comput.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-018-0758-7 Google Scholar
  2. Adelantado F, Vilajosana X, Tuset-Peiro P, Martinez B, Melia-Segui J, Watteyne T (2017) Understanding the limits of lorawan. IEEE Commun Mag 55(9):34–40.  https://doi.org/10.1109/MCOM.2017.1600613 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bor M, Vidler J, Roedig U (2016) LoRa for the internet of things. Junction Publishing, Dublin, pp 361–366Google Scholar
  4. de Velde BV (2017) Multi-hop lorawan: including a forwarding node. https://texus.me/files/Paper%20Multi-hop%20LoRaWAN.pdf. Accessed 18 Jan 2019
  5. Dias J, Grilo A (2018) Lorawan multi-hop uplink extension. In: The 9th international conference on ambient systems, networks and technologies (ANT 2018), ScienceDirect, vol 130, pp 424–431.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2018.04.063. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877050918304216. Accessed 18 Jan 2019
  6. Djamaa B, Yachir A, Richardson M (2017) Hybrid coap-based resource discovery for the internet of things. J Ambient Intell Humaniz Comput.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-017-0450-3 Google Scholar
  7. Gregora L, Vojtech L, Neruda M (2016) Indoor signal propagation of LoRa technology. In: 2016 17th international conference on mechatronics—mechatronika (ME), pp 1–4Google Scholar
  8. Haxhibeqiri J, Van den Abeele F, Moerman I, Hoebeke J (2017) Lora scalability: a simulation model based on interference measurements. Sensors 17(6):1193.  https://doi.org/10.3390/s17061193 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. LoRa Alliance (2017) LoRaWAN 1.1 Specification. LoRa AllianceGoogle Scholar
  10. Perkins CE, Bhagwat P (1994) Highly dynamic destination-sequenced distance-vector routing (DSDV) for mobile computers. SIGCOMM Comput Commun Rev 24(4):234–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Petajajarvi J, Mikhaylov K, Roivainen A, Hanninen T, Pettissalo M (2015) On the coverage of LPWANs: range evaluation and channel attenuation model for LoRa technology. In: 2015 14th international conference on ITS telecommunications (ITST), pp 55–59Google Scholar
  12. Sanchez-Iborra R, Sanchez-Gomez J, Ballesta-Vias J, Cano MD, Skarmeta A (2018) Performance evaluation of lora considering scenario conditions. Sensors.  https://doi.org/10.3390/s18030772 Google Scholar
  13. Semtech (2015) SX1276/77/78/79—137 MHz to 1020 MHz low power long range transceiver. Semtech Corporation. http://www.semtech.com/images/datasheet/sx1276.pdf, datasheet. Accessed 18 Jan 2019
  14. TTN (2017a) The things network (TTN). http://www.thethingsnetwork.org. Accessed 18 Jan 2019
  15. TTN (2017b) The things network (TTN) Zurich Github repository. http://github.com/ttn-zh/ic880a-gateway/wiki. Accessed 18 Jan 2019
  16. Vázquez T, Noz SBM, Bellalta B, Be A (2017) Hare: supporting efficient uplink multi-hop communications in self-organizing lpwans. Sensors.  https://doi.org/10.3390/s18010115 Google Scholar
  17. Winter T, Thubert P, Brandt A, Hui J, Kelsey R, Levis P, Pister K, Struik R, Vasseur J, Alexander R (2012) RPL: IPv6 routing protocol for low-power and lossy networks.  https://doi.org/10.17487/RFC6550. http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6550. Accessed 18 Jan 2019
  18. Zungeru AM, Ang LM, Seng KP (2012) Classical and swarm intelligence based routing protocols for wireless sensor networks: a survey and comparison. J Netw Comput Appl 35(5):1508–1536.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnca.2012.03.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Instituto Superior Técnico - Universidade de LisboaLisbonPortugal
  2. 2.INESC-IDLisbonPortugal

Personalised recommendations