Advertisement

Performing indoor localization with electric potential sensing

  • Biying FuEmail author
  • Florian Kirchbuchner
  • Julian von Wilmsdorff
  • Tobias Grosse-Puppendahl
  • Andreas Braun
  • Arjan Kuijper
Original Research
  • 189 Downloads

Abstract

Location-based services or smart home applications all depend on an accurate indoor positioning system. Basically one divides these systems into token-based and token-free localization systems. In this work, we focus on the token-free system based on smart floor technology. Smart floors can typically be built using pressure sensors or capacitive sensors. However, these set-ups are often hard to deploy as mechanical or electrical features are required below the surface and even harder to replace when detected a sensor malfunctioning. Therefore we present a novel indoor positioning system using an uncommon form of passive electric field sensing (EPS), which detects the electric potential variation caused by body movement. The EPS-based smart floor set-up is easy to install by deploying a grid of passive electrode wires underneath any non-conductive surfaces. Easy maintenance is also ensured by the fact that the sensors are not placed underneath the surface, but on the side. Due to the passive measuring nature, low power consumption is achieved as opposed to active capacitive measurement. Since we do not collect image data as in visual-based systems and all sensor data is processed locally, we preserve the user’s privacy. The proposed architecture achieves a high position accuracy and an excellent spatial resolution. Based on our evaluation conducted in our living lab, we measure a mean positioning error of only 12.7 cm.

Keywords

Indoor positioning system Indoor localization Electric field sensing Electric potential sensing Body charge distribution 

References

  1. Bahl P, Padmanabhan VN (2000) Radar: an in-building rf-based user location and tracking system. : INFOCOM 2000. Nineteenth annual joint conference of the IEEE computer and communications societies. Proceedings, vol 2. IEEE, Piscataway, pp 775–784.  https://doi.org/10.1109/INFCOM.2000.832252 Google Scholar
  2. Braun A, Dutz T (2013) AmbiTrack-marker-free indoor localization and tracking of multiple users in smart environments with a camera-based approach. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 83–93.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41043-7-8 Google Scholar
  3. Braun A, Heggen H, Wichert R (2011) Capfloor—a flexible capacitive indoor localization system. Evaluating AAL systems through competitive benchmarking. Indoor localization and tracking. Springer, New York, pp 26–35.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33533-4-3 Google Scholar
  4. Cohn G, Morris D, Patel SN, Tan DS (2011) Your noise is my command: Sensing gestures using the body as an antenna. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. ACM, New York, pp 791–800.  https://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1979058 (CHI ’11)Google Scholar
  5. Cohn G, Gupta S, Lee TJ, Morris D, Smith JR, Reynolds MS, Tan DS, Patel SN (2012) An ultra-low-power human body motion sensor using static electric field sensing. Proceedings of the 2012 ACM conference on ubiquitous computing. ACM, New York, pp 99–102.  https://doi.org/10.1145/2370216.2370233 (UbiComp ’12)Google Scholar
  6. Dockstader SL, Tekalp AM (2001) Multiple camera tracking of interacting and occluded human motion. Proc IEEE 89(10):1441–1455.  https://doi.org/10.1109/5.959340 Google Scholar
  7. Elble RJ, Thomas SS, Higgins C, Colliver J (1991) Stride-dependent changes in gait of older people. J Neurol 238(1):1–5.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00319700 Google Scholar
  8. Ficker T (2006) Electrification of human body by walking. J Electrost 64(1):10–16.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elstat.2005.04.002 Google Scholar
  9. Filippoupolitis A, Oliff W, Loukas G (2016) Occupancy detection for building emergency management using BLE beacons. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 233–240.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47217-1-25 Google Scholar
  10. Fu B, Kirchbuchner F, von Wilmsdorff J, Grosse-Puppendahl T, Braun A, Kuijper A (2017) Indoor localization based on passive electric field sensing. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 64–79.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56997-0-5 Google Scholar
  11. Grosse-Puppendahl T, Dellangnol X, Hatzfeld C, Fu B, Kupnik M, Kuijper A, Hastall M, Scott J, Gruteser M (2016) Platypus—indoor localization and identification through sensing electric potential changes in human bodies. 14th ACM international conference on mobile systems, applications and services (MobiSys). ACM, New York.  https://doi.org/10.1145/2906388.2906402 Google Scholar
  12. Harland C, Clark T, Prance R (2001) Electric potential probes-new directions in the remote sensing of the human body. Meas Sci Technol 13(2):163.  https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-0233/13/2/304 Google Scholar
  13. Holm S, Nilsen CIC (2010) Robust ultrasonic indoor positioning using transmitter arrays. Indoor positioning and indoor navigation (IPIN), 2010 international conference on. IEEE, Piscataway, pp 1–5.  https://doi.org/10.1109/IPIN.2010.5646198 Google Scholar
  14. Ibara K, Kanetsuna K, Hirakawa M (2013) Identifying individuals’ footsteps walking on a floor sensor device. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 56–63.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02750-0-6 Google Scholar
  15. Kirchbuchner F, Grosse-Puppendahl T, Hastall MR, Distler M, Kuijper A (2015) Ambient intelligence from senior citizens perspectives: understanding privacy concerns, technology acceptance, andexpectations. Ambient intelligence. Springer, New york, pp 48–59.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26005-1-4 Google Scholar
  16. Kruskal W, Wallis W (1952) Use of ranks in one-criterion variance analysis. J Am Stat Assoc. https://doi.org/10.1002/nav.3800020109Google Scholar
  17. Kuhn HW, Yaw B (1955) The hungarian method for the assignment problem. Naval Res Logist Quart pp 83–97Google Scholar
  18. Kurita K (2011) Human identification from walking signal based on measurement of current generated by electrostatic induction. In: 2011 international conference on biometrics and Kansei Engineering, pp 232–237, http://doi.org/10.1109/ICBAKE.2011.12Google Scholar
  19. Kurita K, Takizawa R, Kumon H (2009) Detection of human walking motion based on measurement system of current generated by electrostatic induction. In: 2009 ICCAS-SICE, pp 5485–5488, http://doi.org/10.1007/s10015-010-0753-3Google Scholar
  20. Lee C, Chang Y, Park G, Ryu J, Jeong SG, Park S, Park JW, Lee HC, Hong KS, Lee MH (2004) Indoor positioning system based on incident angles of infrared emitters. Industrial Electronics Society, 2004. IECON 2004. 30th annual conference of IEEE, vol 3. IEEE, Piscataway, pp 2218–2222.  https://doi.org/10.1109/IECON.2004.1432143 Google Scholar
  21. Li N, Becerik-Gerber B (2011) Performance-based evaluation of rfid-based indoor location sensing solutions for the built environment. Adv Eng Inform 25(3):535–546.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2011.02.004 Google Scholar
  22. Li X, Wang K, Wang W, Li Y (2010) A multiple object tracking method using kalman filter. In: The 2010 IEEE international conference on information and automation, pp 1862–1866, http://doi.org/10.1109/ICINFA.2010.5512258Google Scholar
  23. Lim CH, Wan Y, Ng BP, See CMS (2007) A real-time indoor wifi localization system utilizing smart antennas. IEEE Trans Consum Electron 53(2):618–622.  https://doi.org/10.1109/TCE.2007.381737 Google Scholar
  24. Nandashri D, Smitha P (2015) An visual motion tracking of multi-object using hungarian method. Int J Innov Res Dev 4(4)Google Scholar
  25. Pouryazdan A, Prance RJ, Prance H, Roggen D (2016) Wearable electric potential sensing: a new modality sensing hair touch and restless leg movement. Proceedings of the 2016 ACM international joint conference on pervasive and ubiquitous computing: adjunct. ACM, New York, pp 846–850.  https://doi.org/10.1145/2968219.2968286 (UbiComp ’16)Google Scholar
  26. Prance RJ, Beardsmore-Rust ST, Watson P, Harland CJ, Prance H (2008) Remote detection of human electrophysiological signals using electric potential sensors. Appl Phys Lett 93(3):033906.  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2964185 Google Scholar
  27. Pu Q, Gupta S, Gollakota S, Patel S (2013) Whole-home gesture recognition using wireless signals. Proceedings of the 19th annual international conference on mobile computing vol 38; networking. ACM, New York, pp 27–38.  https://doi.org/10.1145/2500423.2500436 (MobiCom ’13)Google Scholar
  28. Rubio JPB, Zhou C, Hernández FS (2005) Vision-based walking parameter estimation for biped locomotion imitation. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 677–684.  https://doi.org/10.1007/11494669-83 Google Scholar
  29. Saad SS, Nakad ZS (2011) A standalone rfid indoor positioning system using passive tags. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 58(5):1961–1970.  https://doi.org/10.1109/TIE.2010.2055774 Google Scholar
  30. Sahbani B, Adiprawita W (2016) Kalman filter and iterative-hungarian algorithm implementation for low complexity point tracking as part of fast multiple object tracking system. In: 2016 international conference on frontiers of information technology (FIT) pp 109–115, https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSEngT.2016.7849633Google Scholar
  31. Steinhage A, Lauterbach C (2008) Sensfloor (r): Ein aal sensorsystem für sicherheit, homecare und komfort. Ambient Assisted Living-AALGoogle Scholar
  32. Valtonen M, Maentausta J, Vanhala J (2009) Tiletrack: Capacitive human tracking using floor tiles. In: 2009 IEEE international conference on pervasive computing and communications, pp 1–10, 10.1109/PERCO.2009.4912749Google Scholar
  33. Williams A, Ganesan D, Hanson A (2007) Aging in place: fall detection and localization in a distributed smart camera network. Proceedings of the 15th international conference on multimedia. ACM, New York, pp 892–901.  https://doi.org/10.1145/1291233.1291435 Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Fraunhofer Institute for Computer Graphics Research IGDDarmstadtGermany

Personalised recommendations