Advertisement

Analyzing EEG waves to support the design of serious games for cognitive training

  • Tania Mondéjar
  • Ramón Hervás
  • Esperanza Johnson
  • Carlos Gutiérrez-López-Franca
  • José Miguel Latorre
Original Research

Abstract

In this paper, electroencephalography (EEG) waves were analysed during the use of a developed video game. It implements specific mechanics (stimuli) that promote the training of cognitive abilities such as short-term memory, attention, and concentration. The conducted study involved ten participants: healthy children between 7 and 12 years old (developmental age) who played the game for an average of 19.2 min. The research question for the present work refers to how specific mechanics involved in platform video games activate electroencephalogram waves according to the above-mentioned cognitive processes. In this sense, the responses have been analysed in terms of cognitive activation through EEG during the video game mechanics. The results are consistent by showing significant findings, described in the manuscript conclusions, and related to EEG wave magnitudes during the studied game mechanics. These findings contribute to supporting the design of video games with cognitive training goals.

Keywords

Serious games Pervasive health Health games Cognitive skills Computational neuroscience EEG 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We want to especially thank the children who helped us by playing and appreciating our game. We are also grateful to their parents, who supported our work and collaborated in our investigation. Finally, many thanks to Rodrigo Marin for helping in the development of this work and to Ivan González who helped us process the EEG data.

References

  1. Abt C (1970) Serious Games. The Viking Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. Aftanas LI, Golocheikine SA (2001) Human anterior and frontal midline theta and lower alpha reflect emotionally positive state and internalized attention: high-resolution EEG investigation of meditation. Neurosci Lett 310:57–60.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3940(01)02094-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bernardini S, Porayska-Pomsta K, Smith TJ (2014) ECHOES: an intelligent serious game for fostering social communication in children with autism. Inf Sci 264:41–60.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2013.10.027 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brehmer Y, Westerberg H, Backman L(2012) Working-memory training in younger and older adults: training gains, transfer, and maintenance. Training-induced cognitive and neural plasticity. 72Google Scholar
  5. Brooke J (1996) SUS: A “quick and dirty” usability scale. In: Jordan PW, Thomas B, Weerdmeester BA, McClelland (eds) Usability evaluation in industry. Taylor & Francis, London, pp 189–194Google Scholar
  6. Brox E, Fernandez-Luque L, Tøllefsen T (2011) Healthy gaming—video game design to promote health. Appl Clin Inf 2(2):128–142.  https://doi.org/10.4338/ACI-2010-10-R-0060 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Compston A (2010) The Berger rhythm: potential changes from the occipital lobes in man. Brain: J Neurol 133(Pt 1):3–6 (PMID: 20058345)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Csikszentmihalyi M (1990) Flow: the psychology of optimal experience. Harper Perennial, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. Diamond A (2013) Executive functions. Ann Rev Psychol.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143750 Google Scholar
  10. Diamond A, Lee K (2011) Interventions and programs demonstrated to aid executive function development in children 4–12 years of age. Science 333:959–964CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Granic I, Lobel A, Engels RC (2014) The benefits of playing video games. Am Psychol 69(1):66–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hamari J, Koivisto J, Pakkanen T (2014) Do persuasive technologies persuade? A review of empirical studies. Persuas Technol.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-071275_11 Google Scholar
  13. Hervas R, Ruiz-Carrasco D, Mondejar T, Bravo J (2017) Gamification mechanics for behavioral change: A systematic review and proposed taxonomy. In: 11th EAI International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare. Barcelona, Spain, 23–26 MayGoogle Scholar
  14. Hubert-Wallander B, Green CS, Bavelier D (2011) Stretchingthelimitsof visual attention: the case of action video games. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci.  https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.116 Google Scholar
  15. Jonides J, Lewis RL, Nee DE, Lustig CA, Berman MG, Moore. KS (2008) The Mind and Brain of Short-Term Memory. Annu Rev Psychol 59(1):193–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kharrazi H, Faiola A, Defazio J (2009) Healthcare game design: Behavioral modeling of serious gaming design for children with chronic diseases. In: 13th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, HCI International 2009. LNCS 5613. Springer.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02583-9_37
  17. King DL, Delfabbro PH, Griffiths MD (2010) Video game structural characteristics: a new psychological taxonomy. Int J Ment Health Addict 8:90–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Luck SJ, Vecera SP (2002) Attention. In: Yantis S, Pashler H (eds) Steven’s handbook of experimental psychologym, 3rd edn, vol 1: sensation and perception. Wiley, New York, pp 235–286Google Scholar
  19. Mondejar T, Hervás R, Johnson E, Gutierrez C, Latorre JM (2015) Correlation between videogame mechanics and executive functions through EEG analysis. J Biomed Inform 63:131–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Montani V, De Filippo De Grazia M, Zorzi M (2014) A new adaptive videogame for training attention and executive functions: design principles and initial validation. Front Psychol.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00409 Google Scholar
  21. Nowack WJ (1995) Neocortical dynamics and human EEG rhythms. Neurology 45:1793CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Olesen J, Westerberg H, Klingberg T (2003) Increased prefrontal and parietal activity after training of working memory. Nature Neurosci 7:75–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Piaget (2015) Psicología del niño (primera edición 1969 y última en 2015)con Bärbel Inhelder. Madrid. Ediciones MorataGoogle Scholar
  24. Postle BR (2006) Working memory as an emergent property of the mind and brain. Neuroscience 139:23–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ray WJ, Cole HW (1985) EEG alpha activity reflects attentional demands, and beta activity reflects emotional and cognitive processes. Science 228:750–752.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.3992243 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rego P, Moreira PM, Reis LP (2010) Serious games for rehabilitation: a survey and a classification towards a taxonomy. In: Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 5th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies, CISTI 2010Google Scholar
  27. Saalmann YB (2012) The pulvinar regulates information transmission between cortical areas based on attention demands. Science 337:753–756CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sauro J (2011) A practical guide to the system usability scale (SUS): background, benchmarks and best practices. Measuring usability LLC, DenverGoogle Scholar
  29. Sicart M (2008) Defining game mechanics. Game Stud 8(2):1–14Google Scholar
  30. Wass S, Porayska-Pomsta K, Johnson MH (2011) Training attentional control in infancy. Curr Biol 21:1–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Zhang Y, Chen Y, Bressler SL, Ding M (2008) Response preparation and inhibition: the role of the cortical sensorimotor beta rhythm. Neurosci 156:1 238–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tania Mondéjar
    • 2
    • 3
  • Ramón Hervás
    • 1
  • Esperanza Johnson
    • 1
  • Carlos Gutiérrez-López-Franca
    • 1
  • José Miguel Latorre
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Technologies and Information SystemsUniversity of Castilla-La ManchaCiudad RealSpain
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyUniversity of Castilla-La ManchaAlbaceteSpain
  3. 3.eSmile, Psychology for Children & AdolescentsCiudad RealSpain

Personalised recommendations