Advertisement

Resource recommender system based on psychological user type indicator

  • Jong-Hyun ParkEmail author
Original Research

Abstract

In an Internet of Things (IoT) environment, service composition and collaboration among heterogeneous resources are required. Thus, an infrastructure that supports these requirements is an essential factor in a seamless service delivery. For these requirements, mobile devices should have multiple functions. However, the miniaturization of mobile devices is another requirement, and a trade-off between the two requirements is naturally generated. My previous study proposed the resource collaboration system that provides a service consisting of shareable resources in the surrounding area to solve the resource limitations of devices. Reducing the processing time for generating the recommendation and improving user satisfaction about the results are important factors, particularly for a small mobile device with limited resources. This study analyzes and classifies personal user preferences from resource usage history based on the Myers-Briggs type indicator. The study also proposes a method to recommend customized resources for classified user types. Results show that the proposed method reduces the recommendation time and increases user satisfaction.

Keywords

Recommender system Resource collaboration Resource reasoning MBTI 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea Grant funded by the Korean Government [NRF-2014R1A1A2057221].

References

  1. Adomavicius G, Mobasher B, Ricci F, Tuzhilin A (2008) Context-aware recommender systems. In: Proceeding of the 2008 ACM conference on recommender systems, Lousanne, Switzerland. pp 217–253. doi: 10.1007/978-0-387-85820-3_7
  2. Bhatia M, Sood SK (2017) Internet of Things based activity surveillance of defence personnel. J Ambient Intell Hum Comput. doi: 10.1007/s12652-017-0507-3 Google Scholar
  3. Gasmi I, Seridi-Bouchelaghem H, Hocine L, Abdelkarim B (2015) Collaborative filtering recommendation based on dynamic changes of user interest. Intell Decis Technol 9(3):271–281. doi: 10.3233/IDT-140221 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Gubbi J, Buyya R, Marusic S, Palaniswami M (2013) Internet of Things (IoT): a vision, architectural elements, and future directions. Future Gener Comput Syst 29:1645–1660. doi: 10.1016/j.future.2013.01.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ha SH (2006) Digital content recommender on the internet. IEEE Intell Syst 21(2):70–77MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hernandez-Ramos JL, Moreno MV, Bernabe JB, Carrillo DG, Skarmeta AF (2015) SAFIR: secure access framework for IoT-enabled services on smart buildings. J Comput Syst Sci 81(8):1452–1463. doi: 10.1016/j.jcss.2014.12.021 MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Lee MC, Jang HK, Paik YS, Jin SE, Lee S (2006) Device collaboration framework in ubiquitous environment: celadon. In: Proceeding of SEUS-WCCIA’06, Gyeongju, KoreaGoogle Scholar
  8. Liu H, Kong X, Bai X, Wang W, Bekele TM, Xia F (2015) Context-based collaborative filtering for citation recommendation. IEEE Access 3:1695–1703. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2015.2481320 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. McFaddin S, Coffman D, Han JH, Jang HK, Kim JH, Lee JK, Lee MC, Moon YS, Narayanaswami C, Paik YS, Park JW, Soroker D, (2007) Celadon: delivering business services to mobile users in public spaces. IBM research report RC24381(W0710-101)Google Scholar
  10. Myers IB, McCaulley MH, Quenk NL, Hammer AL (1998) Manual: a guide to the development and use of the Myers-Briggs type indicator, 3rd edn. Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto. (ISBN 0-89106-130-4) Google Scholar
  11. Park JH (2010) A recommender system for device sharing based on context-aware and personalization. KSII Trans Internet Inf Syst 4(2):174–190. doi: 10.3837/tiis.2010.04.006 Google Scholar
  12. Park JH, Kang JH (2010) Resource collaboration system based on dynamic user preference and context. J Artif Intell Rev 34(3):217–287. doi: 10.1007/s10462-010-9175-9 Google Scholar
  13. Rana S, Jain SK (2012) A study of the dynamic features of recommender systems. J Artif Intell Rev 43(1):141–153. doi: 10.1007/s10462-012-9359-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. RDF 1.1 Primer (2014) W3C Working Group Note, 24 June 2014. https://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-primer/
  15. Saggino A, Kline P (1996) The location of the Myers-Briggs type indicator in personality factor space. Pers Indiv Differ 21(4):591–597. doi: 10.1016/0191-8869(96)00009-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Schmidt A (2010) Ubiquitous computing: are we there yet? Computer 43(2):95–97. doi: 10.1109/MC.2010.54 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. SPARQL 1.1 Query Language (2013) W3C Recommendation, 21 March 2013. https://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-query/
  18. Spoladore D, Modoni G, Sacco M (2016) Smart devices for the home of the future: a new model for collaboration. ERCIM News 2016(104):48–49Google Scholar
  19. Xu L, He W, Li S (2014) Internet of things in industries: a survey. IEEE Trans Ind Inf 10:2233–2243. doi: 10.1109/TII.2014.2300753 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Zang Y, An Y, Hu XT (2014) Automatically recommending healthy living programs to patients with chronic diseases through hybrid content-based and collaborative filtering. In: Proceeding of BIBM 2014, Belfast, United Kingdom. pp 578–582. doi: 10.1109/BIBM.2014.6999224
  21. Zanker M, Ricci F, Jannach D, Terveen L (2010) Measuring the impact of personalization and recommendation on user behaviour. Int J Hum Comput Stud 68(8):469–471. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2010.04.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Computer Science and EngineeringChungnam National UniversityDaejeonRepublic of Korea

Personalised recommendations