Advertisement

Path decision modelling for passengers in the urban rail transit hub under the guidance of traffic signs

  • Zhihong Li
  • Wangtu Ato XuEmail author
Original Research
  • 117 Downloads

Abstract

Traffic signs plays an important role in pedestrian path guidance in the urban rail transit hub. However, the existing traffic signs within urban rail transit hubs are more or less deployed rigidly, which cannot fully consider the relationship between the layout and visual information about passengers’ decisions. Therefore, this paper analyses the influence of traffic signs on the path selection behavior of pedestrians, and construct the MAKLINK diagram to study the impact of traffic signs on pedestrians’ proceeding decisions by a simulation technique. With the MAKLINK diagram, the path plan under the guidance of traffic signs is formulated. Then, the optimal pedestrian path on the MAKLINK diagram considering the effect of traffic signs is optimized via the Ant Colony Algorithm. An empirical study at Beijing South Railway Station is conducted. The findings reflect that traffic signs within urban rail transit hub could effectively take effect to the path selection behavior of large-volume passengers.

Keywords

Urban rail transit hub Passenger behavior Path selection Ant colony algorithm Traffic signs 

References

  1. Balakhontceva M, Karbovskii V, Rybokonenko D, Boukhanovsky A (2015) Multi-agent simulation of passenger evacuation considering ship motions. Procedia Comput Sci 66:140–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Espelosín J, Acosta L, Alonso D (2013) Path planning approach based on flock dynamics of moving particles. Appl Soft Comput 13(4):2159–2170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Hoogendoorn SP, Bovy PHL (2000) Gas-kunatic modeling and simulation of pedestrian flows Transp Res Rec 1710:28–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Kheiri F (2016) Pedestrian circulation simulation based on ant colony system in site analysis. J Build Eng 7:312–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Kok VJ, Lim MK, Chan CS (2016) Crowd behavior analysis: a review where physics meets biology. Neurocomputing 177:342–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Li B, Jin Q, Guo H (2013) Research on psychological characteristics of passengers in terminal and some related measures. Procedia 96:993–1000Google Scholar
  7. Li J, Fu S, He H, Jia H, Li Y, Guo Y (2015) Simulating large-scale pedestrian movement using CA and event driven model: methodology and case study. Phys A 437:304–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Liu M, Zheng X, Cheng Y (2011) Determining the effective distance of emergency evacuation signs. Fire Saf J 46(6):364–369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Mohanta JC, Parhi DR, Patel SK (2011) Path planning strategy for autonomous mobile robot navigation using Petri-GA optimisation. Comput Electr Eng 37(6):1058–1070CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Nassar K (2011) Sign visibility for pedestrians assessed with agent based simulation. Transp Res Rec 2264:18–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Read GJM, Salmon PM, Lenné MG, Stanton NA (2016) Walking the line: understanding pedestrian behaviour and risk at rail level crossings with cognitive work analysis. Appl Ergon A 53:209–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Schadschneider A, Chowdhury D, Nishinari K (2011) Pedestrian dynamics, stochastic transport in complex systems, Chap 11. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 407–460CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. Shiwakoti N, Sarvi M (2013) Understanding pedestrian crowd panic: a review on model organisms approach. J Transp Geogr 26:12–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Shiwakoti N, Gong Y, Shi X, Ye Z (2015) Examining influence of merging architectural features on pedestrian crowd movement. Saf Sci 75:15–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Skinderowicz R (2016) The GPU-based parallel ant colony system. J Parallel Distrib Comput 98:48–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Tan GZ, He H, Sloman A (2007) Ant colony system algorithm for real-time globally optimal path planning of mobile robots. Acta Autom Sin 33(3):279–285CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. Tissera PC, Printista AM, Luque E (2012) A hybrid simulation model to test behaviour designs in an emergency evacuation. Procedia Comput Sci 9:266–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Wang S, Lv W, Song W (2015) Behavior of ants escaping from a single-exit room. PLoS ONE 10(6):e0131784CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Zhang L, Liu M, Wu X, AbouRizk SM (2016) Simulation-based route planning for pedestrian evacuation in metro stations: a case study. Autom Constr 71:430–442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Zheng X, Zhong T, Liu M (2009) Modeling crowd evacuation of a building based on seven methodological approaches. Build Environ 44(3):437–445CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Beijing Engineering Research Center of Urban Transport Infrastructure ConstructionBeijing University of Civil Engineering and ArchitectureBeijingChina
  2. 2.School of TransportationBeijing Jiaotong UniversityBeijingChina
  3. 3.Department of Urban PlanningXiamen UniversityXiamenChina

Personalised recommendations