Advertisement

Ontology-based office activity recognition with applications for energy savings

  • Tuan Anh Nguyen
  • Andrea Raspitzu
  • Marco Aiello
Original Research

Abstract

One of the key inputs for building energy and comfort management systems is detailed and precise office activity information, i.e., what is happening in each of the monitored areas (e.g., working place, meeting room, coffee corner, etc.). Such information can be used to control appliances for saving energy while still satisfying user comfort needs accordingly. We propose an activity recognition solution that effectively handles multiple-user, multiple-area situations, rapidly recognizing office activities as inputs for building energy and comfort management systems. The proposed solution is based on an ontological approach, using low-cost, binary, and wireless sensors. Through initial experiments, our prototype is able to recognize seven typical office activities (working at a desk with or without a PC, having a meeting, giving a presentation, having a coffee break, and presence/absence) at three office activity areas (working room, meeting room, and coffee corner) for two persons with average accuracy of more than 92 %.

Keywords

Energy saving buildings Ontological reasoning Activity recognition 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank Peter Kamphuis, Dimitri de Jong and Jeroen Jager for providing data on the survey reported in Sect. 2.2. We also thank Rosario Contarino for useful discussions on the implementation of simple sensors. Andrea Raspitzu thanks the Distributed Systems Group at the University of Groningen for supporting him during his summer internship during which he was involved in the reported research. Tuan Anh Nguyen is supported by the Vietnam International Education Development Program. The work is supported by the EU FP7 Project GreenerBuildings, Contract No. 258888 and the Dutch National Research Council Energy Smart Offices project, Contract No. 647.000.004.

References

  1. Agostini A, Bettini C, Riboni D (2009) Hybrid reasoning in the care middleware for context awareness. Int J Web Eng Technol 5(1):3–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aiello M, Pratt-Hartmann I, van Benthem J (2007) Handbook of spatial logics, vol 4. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  3. Baader F, Calvanese D, McGuinness D, Nardi D, Patel-Schneider P (2003) The description logic handbook: theory, implementation and applications. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  4. Barbato, A., Borsani, L., Capone, A., Melzi, S (2009) Home energy saving through a user profiling system based on wireless sensors. In: Proceedings of the first ACM workshop on embedded sensing systems for energy-efficiency in buildings, BuildSys ’09, New York, NY, USA. ACM, pp 49–54Google Scholar
  5. Chen H, Finin T, Joshi A (2005) Semantic web in the context broker architecture. Technical report, DTIC DocumentGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen L, Khalil I (2011) Activity recognition: approaches, practices and trends. Activity recognition in pervasive intelligent environments. In: Chen L, Nugent CD, Biswas J, Hoey J (eds) Atlantis ambient and pervasive intelligence, vol 4. Atlantis Press, Mermaid Waters, pp 1–31Google Scholar
  7. Chen L, Nugent C (2009) Ontology-based activity recognition in intelligent pervasive environments. Int J Web Inf Syst 5(4):410–430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chen L, Nugent CD, Wang H (2012) A knowledge-driven approach to activity recognition in smart homes. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 24(6):961–974CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Curry MR (1996) The work in the world—geographical practice and the written word. University of Minnesota Press, MinnesotaGoogle Scholar
  10. Davisson RL, Johnson AK, Lewis SJ (1994) Nitrosyl factors mediate active neurogenic hindquarter vasodilation in the conscious rat 23(6 Pt 2):962–966CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Degeler V, Lazovik A (2012) Reduced context consistency diagrams for resolving inconsistent data. ICST Trans Ubiquitous Environ 12(10–12)Google Scholar
  12. Dodier RH, Henze GP, Tiller DK, Guo X (2006) Building occupancy detection through sensor belief networks. Energy Build 38(9):1033–1043CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Erickson, V., Carreira-Perpinan, M., and Cerpa, A. (2011). OBSERVE: occupancy-based system for efficient reduction of HVAC energy. In: 10th International conference on information processing in sensor networks (IPSN), 2011, pp 258–269Google Scholar
  14. Georgievski I, Degeler V, Pagani GA, Nguyen TA, Lazovik A, Aiello M (2012) Optimizing energy costs for offices connected to the smart grid. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 3:2273–2285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gu T, Wang X, Pung H, Zhang D (2004) An ontology-based context model in intelligent environments. In: Proceedings of communication networks and distributed systems modeling and simulation conference, vol 2004, pp 270–275Google Scholar
  16. Hagras H, Callaghan V, Colley M, Clarke G, Pounds-Cornish A, Duman H (2004) Creating an ambient-intelligence environment using embedded agents. IEEE Intell Syst 19(6):12–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Harle RK, Hopper A (2008) The potential for location-aware power management. In: Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Ubiquitous computing, UbiComp ’08, New York, NY, USA. ACM, pp 302–311Google Scholar
  18. Harris C, Cahill V (2005) Exploiting user behaviour for context-aware power management. In: IEEE international conference on wireless and mobile computing, networking and communications, 2005. (WiMob’2005), vol 4, pp 122–130Google Scholar
  19. Hawarah L, Ploix S, Jacomino M (2010) User behavior prediction in energy consumption in housing using Bayesian networks. In: Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Artificial intelligence and soft computing: Part I, ICAISC’10. Springer, Berlin, pp 372–379Google Scholar
  20. Horrocks I, Patel-Schneider PF, Harmelen FV (2003) From SHIQ and RDF to OWL: the making of a web ontology language. J Web Semant 1:2003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Klein M, Schmidt A, Lauer R (2007) Ontology-centred design of an ambient middleware for assisted living: the case of SOPRANO. In: 30th annual German conference on artificial intelligence towards ambient intelligence: methods for cooperating ensembles in ubiquitous environments (AIM-CU) (KI 2007)Google Scholar
  22. Latfi F, Lefebvre B, Descheneaux C (2007a) Ontology-based management of the telehealth smart home, dedicated to elderly in loss of cognitive autonomy. In: OWLED 2007 Workshop on OWL: experiences and directionsGoogle Scholar
  23. Latfi F, Lefebvre B, Descheneaux C (2007b) Ontology-based management of the telehealth smart home, dedicated to elderly in loss of cognitive autonomy. In: Proceedings of the OWLED 2007 workshop on OWL: experiences and directions, vol 258Google Scholar
  24. Levis P, Madden S, Polastre J, Szewczyk R, Woo A, Gay D, Hill J, Welsh M, Brewer E, Culler D (2004) TinyOS: an operating system for sensor networks. In: Ambient intelligence. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  25. Nguyen TA, Aiello M (2013) Energy intelligent buildings based on user activity: a survey. Energy Build 56(0):244–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Nguyen TA, Aiello M (2012) Beyond indoor presence monitoring with simple sensors. In: Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on pervasive and embedded computing and communication systemsGoogle Scholar
  27. Nguyen TA, Raspitzu A, Aiello M (2012) Ontology of Office Activities. Technical Report JBI preprint 2012-12-9, University of GroningenGoogle Scholar
  28. Raghunathan V, Schurgers C, Park S, Srivastava MB (2002) Energy-aware wireless microsensor networks. IEEE Signal Process Mag 19(2):40–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Riboni D, Bettini C (2011) COSAR: hybrid reasoning for context-aware activity recognition. Pers Ubiquitous Comput 15(3):271–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. TEP133 (2008) TinyOS Enhancement Proposals 133: Packet-level Time SynchronizationGoogle Scholar
  31. Wahl F, Milenkovic M, Amft O (2013) A Distributed PIR-Based Approach for Estimating People Count in Office Environments. In: EUC 2012: Proceedings of the 10th IEEE/IFIP international conference on embedded and ubiquitous computingGoogle Scholar
  32. Yamada N, Sakamoto K, Kunito G, Isoda Y, Yamazaki K, Tanaka S (2007) Applying ontology and probabilistic model to human activity recognition from surrounding things. IPSJ Digit Cour 3:506–517CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tuan Anh Nguyen
    • 1
  • Andrea Raspitzu
    • 2
  • Marco Aiello
    • 1
  1. 1.Distributed Systems Group, Johann Bernoulli InstituteUniversity of GroningenGroningenThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Department of Computer Science, Faculty of Mathematical and Physical SciencesUniversit degli Studi di TorinoTurinItaly

Personalised recommendations