Advertisement

Data forwarding of realtime mobile target tracking in wireless sensor networks

  • Yi YangEmail author
  • Lian Li
  • Hao Li
Original Research

Abstract

Along with the advancement in wireless communications and electronics, in this paper, we first propose a novel application problem in wireless sensor networks. It is the data forwarding of real-time mobile target tracking problem. We mainly focus on the researches of the strategy of routing the tracking data to several sinks with the consideration both of energy conservation and latency limitation. We propose three different heuristic methods [minimum latency routing, maximum utilization routing and active first routing (AFR) respectively] to research and compare their performance for solving the problems. We also use the traditional Dijkstra’s shortest path algorithm to get the lower bound of the latency limitation. As a result, we found that the AFR algorithm is better than others, it achieves the similar latency limitation with Dijkstra’s and it get a 1.2–1.5 times of energy conservation than other algorithms regardless of energy supplement conditions. It is an optimal algorithm for this problem.

Keywords

Realtime data forwarding energy efficiency Target tracking Large scale wireless sensor networks 

References

  1. Akkaya K, Younis M (2005) A survey on routing protocols for wireless sensor networks. Ad Hoc Networks 3(3):325–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Azim MA, Kibria MR, Jamalipour A (2009) An optimized forwarding protocol for lifetime extension of wireless sensor networks. Wirel Commun Mob Computing 9(1):103–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Dijkstra EW (1959) A note on two problems in connexion with graphs. Numerische Mathematik 1:269–271MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Garey M, Johnson D (1979) Computers and intractability: a guide to the theory of NP-completeness. Freeman, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. Hedetniemi SM, Hedetniemi ST, Liestman AL (1988) A survey of gossiping and broadcasting in communication networks. Networks 18(4):319–349. doi: 10.1002/net.3230180406 MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Heinzelman W, Chandrakasan A, Balakrishnan H (2000) Energy-efficient communication protocol for wireless microsensor networks. In: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System sciences, 2000, pp 3005–3014Google Scholar
  7. Heizelman W (2000) Application specific protocol architectures for wireless networks. Ph.D thesis, MITGoogle Scholar
  8. Intanagonwiwat C, Govindan R, Estrin D (2000) Directed diffusion: a scalable and robust communication paradigm for sensor networks. In: Proceedings of the 6th annual international conference on Mobile computing and networking, MobiCom ’00, pp 56–67Google Scholar
  9. Kulik J, Heinzelman W, Balakrishnan H (2002) Negotiation-based protocols for disseminating information in wireless sensor networks. Wirel Netw 8:169–185zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Lindsey S, Raghavendra C (2002) Pegasis: power-efficient gathering in sensor information systems. In: Aerospace Conference Proceedings, 2002. IEEE, vol 3, pp 1125–1130Google Scholar
  11. Liu L (2008) Energy conservation in wireless sensor networks and related problems of graph theory. Ph.D thesis, Universite Paris-sudGoogle Scholar
  12. Manjeshwar A, Agrawal D (2001) Teen: a routing protocol for enhanced efficiency in wireless sensor networks. In: Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium., Proceedings 15th International, pp 2009–2015Google Scholar
  13. Meng T, Rodoplu V (1998) Distributed network protocols for wireless communication. In: Proceedings of the 1998 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and systems, 1998. ISCAS ’98, vol 4, pp 600–603Google Scholar
  14. Ni LM, Liu Y, Lau YC, Patil AP (2004) Landmarc: indoor location sensing using active rfid. Wirel Networks 10:701–710CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Rodoplu V, Meng T (1999) Minimum energy mobile wireless networks. IEEE J Sel Areas Commun 17(8):1333–1344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Salhieh A, Weinmann J, Kochhal M, Schwiebert L (2001) Power efficient topologies for wireless sensor networks. In: International Conference on Parallel Processing, 2001, pp 156–163Google Scholar
  17. Shiloach Y (1978) The two paths problem is polynomial. Tech rep, Stanford, CA, USAGoogle Scholar
  18. Shiloach Y, Perl Y (1978) Finding two disjoint paths between two pairs of vertices in a graph. J ACM 25:1–9MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Siegemund F, Florkemeier C (2003) Interaction in pervasive computing settings using bluetooth-enabled active tags and passive rfid technology together with mobile phones. In: Proceedings of the First IEEE International Conference on Pervasive computing and communications, 2003 (PerCom 2003), pp 378–387Google Scholar
  20. Singh S, Woo M, Raghavendra CS (1998) Power-aware routing in mobile ad hoc networks. In: Proceedings of the 4th annual ACM/IEEE international conference on Mobile computing and networking, ACM, MobiCom ’98, pp 181–190Google Scholar
  21. Sinha A, Chandrakasan A (2001) Dynamic power management in wireless sensor networks. IEEE J Des Test Comput 18(2):62–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Yick J, Mukherjee B, Ghosal D (2008) Wireless sensor network survey. Comput Networks 52:2292–2330CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Information Science and EngineeringLanzhou UniversityLanzhouChina
  2. 2.Laboratoire de Recherche en Informatique, Bat 490 Universite Paris-Sud 11OrsayFrance

Personalised recommendations