Advertisement

Journal of Visualization

, Volume 22, Issue 4, pp 795–807 | Cite as

Study on reduction in pressure losses in pipe bends using guide vanes

  • Reji Reghunathan Valsala
  • S. W. Son
  • Abhilash SuryanEmail author
  • Heuy Dong Kim
Regular Paper
  • 99 Downloads

Abstract

The pipe bends are common elements in pipeline network of mechanical systems. The losses in pipes and bend are generally considered as insignificant and unavoidable. The recent trends in achieving a higher order of performance in machines led to optimization by reduction in minor energy losses. The usage of components with the higher surface finish is the main methodology adopted for minimizing frictional loss. In bends, especially in the case of turbulent flows, the losses are significant when comparing the frictional pipe losses. The viscous interaction between fluid layers is more in bends due to the presence of flow separation secondary swirling motion. The reduction in these interactions can be achieved by installing turning vane (guide vanes) inside the pipe bend. The current literature available lacks detailing of many included flow physics in bends and vaned bends. The present work focuses on flow characteristics on a 90° curved bend. Incompressible isothermal RANS solutions were performed using turbulence treatment with the k − ω SST model. The initial validation study is carried out with available experimental results. The bend downstream velocity distribution and bend wall pressure distribution are carried out. Further, the computational methodology is extended to bend with different vane configurations and for different Reynolds numbers. The velocity, wall pressure, swirl strength, turbulent kinetic energy, etc. are reported for downstream locations. The comparison of pressure loss through different cases and improvements in flow through bend due to the inclusion of vanes are discussed in this work.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

Dean number Guide vanes Pipe bend Pressure drop Secondary flow 

List of symbols

Cp

Coefficient pressure

D

Diameter of pipe, m

Dn

Dean number

G

Acceleration due to gravity, m/s2

K

Resistance coefficient

Nv

Number of vanes

P

Pressure, Pa

Pt

Total pressure, Pa

ΔP

Pressure drop, Pa

R

Radius of the bend, m

Re

Reynolds number

R

Radial distance, m

S

Centerline length, m

TKE

Turbulent kinetic energy, J

V

Velocity, m/s

Greek symbols

Α

Angular location in bend curvature

Δ

Ratio of pipe diameter to bend diameter

Ρ

Density, kg/m3

Θ

Angular location in pipe wall

Τ

Shear stress, Pa

Μ

Dynamic viscosity, kg/(s m)

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP) and the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy (MOTIE) of the Republic of Korea (No. 20172010105200).

References

  1. Al-Rafai WN, Tridimas YD, Woolley NH (1990) A study of turbulent flows in pipe bends. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part C Mech Eng Sci 204(6):399–408Google Scholar
  2. ANSYS Inc (2014) CFX modelling guide and theory guide, ANSYS Academic Research, Release 16Google Scholar
  3. Carlsson C, Alenius E, Fuchs L (2015) Swirl switching in turbulent flow through 90° pipe bends. Phys Fluids 27(8):085112Google Scholar
  4. Crawford N, Spence S, Simpson A, Cunningham G (2009) A numerical investigation of the flow structures and losses for turbulent flow in 90° elbow bends. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part E J Process Mech Eng 223(1):27–44Google Scholar
  5. Dutta P, Saha SK, Nandi N, Pal N (2016) Numerical study on flow separation in 90° pipe bend under high Reynolds number by k − ε modelling. Eng Sci Technol Int J 19(2):904–910Google Scholar
  6. Gao R, Liu K, Li A, Fang Z, Yang Z, Cong B (2018a) Study of the shape optimization of a tee guide vane in a ventilation and air-conditioning duct. Build Environ 132:345–356Google Scholar
  7. Gao R, Liu K, Li A, Fang Z, Yang Z, Cong B (2018b) Biomimetic duct tee for reducing the local resistance of a ventilation and air-conditioning system. Build Environ 129:130–141Google Scholar
  8. Hager WH (1984) An approximate treatment of flow in branches and bends. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part C J Mech Eng Sci 198(1):63–69Google Scholar
  9. Haskew JT, Sharif MAR (1997) Performance evaluation of vaned pipe bends in turbulent flow of liquid propellants. Appl Math Model 21(1):48–62zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. Hufnagel L, Canton J, Örlü R, Marin O, Merzari E, Schlatter P (2018) The three-dimensional structure of swirl-switching in bent pipe flow. J Fluid Mech 835:86–101MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  11. Hüttl TJ, Friedrich R (2001) Direct numerical simulation of turbulent flows in curved and helically coiled pipes. Comput Fluids 30(5):591–605zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. Kalpakli A, Örlü R, Alfredsson PH (2012) Dean vortices in turbulent flows: rocking or rolling? J Vis 15(1):37–38Google Scholar
  13. Kalpakli Vester A, Sattarzadeh SS, Örlü R (2016) Combined hot-wire and PIV measurements of a swirling turbulent flow at the exit of a 90° pipe bend. J Vis 19:261.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12650-015-0310-1 Google Scholar
  14. Kim J, Yadav M, Kim S (2014) Characteristics of secondary flow induced by 90-degree elbow in turbulent pipe flow. Eng Appl Comput Fluid Mech 8(2):229–239Google Scholar
  15. Liou TM, Lee HL, Liao CC (2001) Effects of guide-vane number in a three-dimensional 60-deg curved side-dump combustor inlet. J Fluids Eng 123(2):211Google Scholar
  16. Mark A (2014) Turning vanes in exhaust duct flow: study for energy efficiency, optimization and pressure drop mitigation, Ph.D. thesis, Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  17. Moujaes SF, Aekula S (2009) CFD predictions and experimental comparisons of pressure drop effects of turning vanes in 90° duct elbows. J Energy Eng 135(4):119–126Google Scholar
  18. Noorani A, El Khoury GK, Schlatter P (2013) Evolution of turbulence characteristics from straight to curved pipes. Int J Heat Fluid Flow 41:16–26Google Scholar
  19. Nugroho S, Hidayatulloh AA (2016) Performance analysis of the effect on insertion guide vanes for rectangular elbow 90° cross section. Emit Int J Eng Technol 4(2):358–370Google Scholar
  20. Pantokratoras A (2016) Steady laminar flow in a 90° bend. Adv Mech Eng 8(9):1–9Google Scholar
  21. Rütten F, Schröder W, Meinke M (2005) Large-eddy simulation of low frequency oscillations of the Dean vortices in turbulent pipe bend flows. Phys Fluids 17(3):035107zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. Safari Pour S, Mohanarangam K, Vahaji S et al (2018) Visualisation of gas–liquid bubbly flows in a large diameter pipe with 90° bend. J Vis 21:585.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12650-018-0486-2 Google Scholar
  23. Saha SK, Nandi N (2017) Change in flow separation and velocity distribution due to effect of guide vane installed in a 90 degree bend. Mech Mech Eng 21(2):353–361Google Scholar
  24. Sakakibara J, Machida N (2012) Measurement of turbulent flow upstream and downstream of a circular pipe bend. Phys Fluids 24(4):041702Google Scholar
  25. Spedding PL, Benard E, Mcnally GM (2008) Fluid flow through 90 degree bends. Dev Chem Eng Miner Process 12(1–2):107–128Google Scholar
  26. Sudo K, Sumida M, Hibara H (1998) Experimental investigation on turbulent flow in a circular-sectioned 90-degree bend. Exp Fluids 25(1):42–49Google Scholar
  27. Suryan A, Kim HD, Setoguchi T (2010a) A study on the flow characteristics of compressible viscous flow through pipe bends. In: Proceedings of 13th asian congress of fluid mechanics, IUT, Dhaka, BangladeshGoogle Scholar
  28. Suryan A, Shin CS, Kim HD, Setoguchi T, Matsuo S (2010b) Flow characteristics of compressible gas flow through pipe bends. In: Proceedings of 14th international symposium on flow visualization, Daegu, South KoreaGoogle Scholar
  29. Suryan A, Kim HD, Setoguchi T (2011) Numerical study on the flow choking in pipe bend. In: Proceedings of 10th international symposium on experimental and computational aerothermodynamics of internal flows, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, BelgiumGoogle Scholar
  30. Takamura H, Ebara S, Hashizume H, Aizawa K, Yamano H (2012) Flow visualization and frequency characteristics of velocity fluctuations of complex turbulent flow in a short elbow piping under high reynolds number condition. J Fluids Eng 134(10):101201Google Scholar
  31. Zhang T, Zhang YO, Ouyang H (2015) Structural vibration and fluid-borne noise induced by turbulent flow through a 90° piping elbow with/without a guide vane. Int J Press Vessel Pip 125:66–77Google Scholar
  32. Zhou J, Balachandar S, Adrian RJ (1999) Mechanisms for generating coherent packet of hairpin vortices in near-wall turbulence. J Fluid Mech 387:353–396MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Visualization Society of Japan 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Fluid Machinery Technology and Research CentreDaejoo MachineryDaeguSouth Korea
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical EngineeringCollege of Engineering TrivandrumTrivandrumIndia
  3. 3.Department of Mechanical EngineeringAndong National UniversityAndongSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations