Journal of Visualization

, Volume 20, Issue 4, pp 765–775 | Cite as

Experimental observation of immediate focus of underwater shock wave by using concave emitter induced by nano-pulsed laser

Regular Paper
  • 103 Downloads

Abstract

Propagation of an underwater micro-shock wave induced by a single-pulsed laser was observed by the shadowgraph technique. To introduce the micro-shock wave into water, different types of shock wave emitters are designed using flat and concave glass coated with 100-nm-thick titanium metal. The experiment was carried out in low irradiation intensity range from 0 to 200 GW/m2, and the shock wave was produced by the thermo-elastic effect of the metal film. In this study, we proposed an immediate focusing technique using a concave surface. The focusing effect was confirmed by optical observation and pressure measurement. The velocity and Mach number of shock wave were calculated using a shadowgraph imaging technique. The result revealed that the laser-induced micro-shock wave propagated approximately at just under the sound of speed in water. From the pressure measurement, it was confirmed that the shock wave strength from the concave emitter was 1.5 times stronger than the flat one. The effective area of the focus was determined by the radius of curvature of the concave surface and the irradiation beam diameter.

Graphical Abstract

Keywords

Micro-shock wave Shadowgraph technique Shock wave emitter Focusing shock wave 

References

  1. Ando T, Sato S, Takano S, Ashida H, Obara M (2009) Propagation characteristics of laser-induced stress wave in deep tissue for gene transfer. Appl Surf Sci 255:9898–9901CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Blanchet GB, Fincher CR, Jackson CL, Shah SI, Gardner KH (1993) Laser ablation and the production of polymer films. Science 262:719–721CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boonsang S (2009) Photoacoustic generation mechanism and measurement system for biomedical applications. Int J Appl Biomed Eng 2:17–23Google Scholar
  4. Cross GB (2009) Investigation of a laser-induced breakdown spark as a near field guide star for aero optic measurements. Dissertation, University of Notre Dame, IndianaGoogle Scholar
  5. Ding L (2009) Micro-processing of polymers and biological materials using high repetition rate femtosecond laser pulses. Dissertation, University of RochesterGoogle Scholar
  6. Fujinami M, Hirahara H, Kawahashi M (2006) Velocity measurement of induced flow by laser shock peening. In: Proceedings of the 12th international symposium on flow visualization, (ISFV12-51.3)Google Scholar
  7. Gaspard S, Forster M, Huber C, Zafiu C, Trettenhahn G, Kautek W, Castillejo M (2008) Femtosecond laser processing of biopolymers at high repetition rate. Phys Chem Chem Phys 10:6174–6181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Goto M, Kasahara A, Tosa M (2009) Molecular nanojet in water. Appl Phys Express 2:1–2Google Scholar
  9. Hirahara H, Fujinami M, Kawahashi M (2006) Velocity measurement of induced flow by laser focusing shock wave. J Therm Sci 15:48–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hirahara H, Fujinami M, Kawahashi M (2008) Optical measurement of laser induced micro shock wave on a metal surface. J Fluid Sci Technol 3:965–974CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hirugaya J, Hirahara H, Mine Y (2009) Underwater shock wave by thermo-elastic effect with laser irradiation. J Vis Soc of Jpn 29–1:323–324Google Scholar
  12. Ko SH, Ryu SG, Misra N, Pan H, Grigoropoulos CP, Kladias N, Panides E, Domoto GA (2007) Laser induced short plane acoustic wave focusing in water. Appl Phys Lett 91:051128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ko SH, Ryu SG, Misra N, Pan H, Grigoropoulos CP, Kladias N, Panides E, Domoto GA (2008) Laser induced plane acoustic wave generation, propagation, and interaction with rigid structures in water. J Appl Phys 104:073104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lee H, Gojani AB, Han T, Yoh JJ (2011) Dynamics of laser-induced bubble collapse visualized by time-resolved optical shadowgraph. J Vis 14:331–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Li L (2000) The advances and characteristics of high-power diode laser materials processing. Opt Lasers Eng 34:231–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Mézel C, Souquet A, Hallo L, Guillemot F (2010) Bioprinting by laser-induced forward transfer for tissue engineering applications: jet formation modeling. Biofabrication 2:014103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Nakano H, Tsuyama M, Miyauti S, Shibayanagi T, Tsukamoto M, Abe N (2010) Femtosecond and nanosecond laser peening of stainless steel. JLMN 5:175–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Nath A, Khare A (2011) Effect of focusing conditions on laser-induced shock waves at titanium-water interface. Appl Opt 50:3275–3281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Nolte S, Will M, Burghoff J, Tuennermann A (2003) Femtosecond waveguide writing: a new avenue to three-dimensional integrated optics. Appl Phys 77:109–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Nose H, Maeda H, Yamamoto N, Nakahara M (2004) Effect of optical fiber output surface on laser induced shock wave and its application. Jpn J Appl Phys 43:6145–6151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Park HK, Grigoropoulos CP, Leung WP, Tam AC (1994) A Practical excimer laser-based cleaning tool for removal of surface contaminants. IEEE Trans Compon Packaging Manuf Technol Part A 17:631–643CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Park HK, Kim D, Grigoropoulos CP, Tam AC (1996) Pressure generation and measurement in the rapid vaporization of water on a pulsed-laser-heated surface. J Appl Phys 80:4072–4081CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Pritchett JW (1971) An evaluation of various theoretical models for underwater explosion bubble pulsation. US Department of DefenseGoogle Scholar
  24. Saito T, Marumoto M, Yamashita H, Hosseini SHR, Nakagawa A, Hirano T, Takayama K (2003) Experimental and numerical studies of underwater shock wave attenuation. Shock Waves 13:139–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Sasoh A, Watanabe K, Sano Y, Mukai N (2005) Behavior of bubbles induced by the interaction of a laser pulse with a metal plate in water. Appl Phys A 80:1497–1500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sigrist MW (1986) Laser generation of acoustic waves in liquids and gases. J Appl Phys 60:R83–R121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Srinivasan R (1986) Ablation of polymers and biological tissue by ultraviolet lasers. Science 234:559–565CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Toker G, Bulatov V, Kovalchuk T, Schechter I (2009a) Micro-dynamics of optical breakdown in water induced by nanosecond laser, pulses of 1064 nm wavelength. Chem Phys Lett 471:244–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Toker G, Bulatov V, Kovalchuk T, Schechter I (2009b) Underwater interaction of 1064 nm laser radiation with metal target. World Acad Sci Eng Technol 3:25–28Google Scholar
  30. Utsunomiya Y, Kajiwara T, Nishiyama T, Nagayama K, Kubota S (2010) Pulse laser ablation at water–air interface. Appl Phys A 99:641–649CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Varslot T, Masøy S (2006) Forward propagation of acoustic pressure pulses in 3D soft biological tissue. Model Identif Control 27:181–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ward B, Emmony DC (1991) Direct observation of the pressure developed in a liquid during cavitation-bubble collapse. Appl Phys Lett 59:2228–2230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Zergiotia I, Karaiskou A, Papazoglou DG, Fotakis C, Kapsetaki M, Kafetzopoulos D (2005) Femtosecond laser microprinting of biomaterials. Appl Phys Lett 86:163902CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Visualization Society of Japan 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Graduate School of Science and EngineeringSaitama UniversitySakuraJapan

Personalised recommendations