Advertisement

Enhancement of Sewage Sludge Bioconversion to Methane by the Addition of Exhausted Coffee Biowaste Liquid Fraction

  • Rita FragosoEmail author
  • Ana Carvalho
  • Elizabeth Duarte
Original Paper
  • 54 Downloads

Abstract

Anaerobic co-digestion of organic rich wastes and wastewater sludge has become an attractive economic possibility for water utilities as it enhances biogas production. The suitability of the organic rich waste depends on its biodegradability as well as on its synergetic effect on the anaerobic digestion process. The feasibility of sewage sludge (SS) treatment via co-digestion was studied in a semi-continuous mode at mesophilic conditions (36 ± 1 °C), with a hydraulic retention time of 17 days and an average organic loading rate of 0.94 ± 0.05 gVS Lreactor day−1, using the liquid fraction of pre-treated exhausted coffee biowaste (LECB) as a co-substrate. An anaerobic co-digestion trial (T1) was performed using as feeding mixture 80% SS and 20% LECB (v:v) and compared against a reference scenario of mono-digestion of SS (T0). The stability along assays was ensured by monitoring the digestate characteristics (pH, electrical conductivity, total alkalinity and ammonia content) and the specific energy-loading rate (SELR). Along the operation time of T1, methane yield and VS removal were significantly higher in comparison to mono-digestion of SS. Results showed that the addition of the co-substrate had a positive effect on specific methane production (3 times higher) and methane content (12% higher), indicating this is a feasible strategy towards self-sufficient wastewater treatment plants.

Keywords

Anaerobic co-digestion Exhausted coffee biowaste Sewage sludge Waste-to-energy 

Abbreviations

AcoD

Anaerobic co-digestion

AD

Anaerobic digestion

CSTR

Continuous stirring tank reactor

ECB

Exhausted coffee biowaste

GPR

Gas production rate

HRT

Hydraulic retention time

LECB

Liquid fraction of the exhausted coffee biowaste

OLR

Organic loading rate

SCG

Spent coffee grounds

SELR

Specific energy loading rate

SMP

Specific methane production

SS

Sewage sludge

WWTP

Wastewater treatment plant

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Linking Landscape, Environment, Agriculture and Food (LEAF) research unit (UID/AGR/04129/2013). The authors wish to thank Nestlé Portugal, for providing exhausted coffee biowaste and AdP-Águas de Portugal for providing sewage sludge samples.

References

  1. 1.
    Bertanza, G., Canato, M., Laera, G.: Towards energy self-sufficiency and integral material recovery in waste water treatment plants: assessment of upgrading options. J. Clean. Prod. 170, 1206–1218 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Verstraete, W., Clauwaert, P., Vlaeminck, S.E.: Used water and nutrients: recovery perspectives in a ‘panta rhei’ context. Bioresour. Technol. 215, 199–208 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wang, Q., Wei, W., Gong, Y., Yu, Q., Li, Q., Sun, J., Yuan, Z.: Technologies for reducing sludge production in wastewater treatment plants: state of the art. Sci. Total Environ. 587–588, 510–521 (2017)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Xie, S., Wickham, R., Nghiem, L.: Synergistic effect from anaerobic co-digestion of sewage sludge and organic wastes. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 116, 191–197 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Carvalho, A.R.M., Fragoso, R., Gominho, J., Saraiva, A., Costa, R., Duarte, E.: Water-energy nexus: anaerobic co-digestion with elephant grass hydrolysate. J. Environ. Manage. 181, 48–53 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Park, K., Jang, H., Park, M., Lee, K., Kim, D., Kim, Y.: Combination of different substrates to improve anaerobic digestion of sewage sludge in a wastewater treatment plant. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 109, 73–77 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pinto, N., Carvalho, A., Pacheco, J., Duarte, E.: Study of different ratios of primary and waste activated sludges to enhance the methane yield. Water Environ. J. 30, 203–210 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Di Maria, F., Micale, C.: Energetic potential of the co-digestion of sludge with bio-waste in existing wastewater treatment plant digesters: a case study of an Italian province. Energy 136, 110–116 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mattioli, A., Gatti, G.B., Mattuzzi, G.P., Cecchi, F., Bolzonella, D.: Co-digestion of the organic fraction of municipal solid waste and sludge improves the energy balance of wastewater treatment plants: Rovereto case study. Renew. Energy 113, 980–988 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tsapekos, P., Kougias, P., Treu, L., Campanaro, S., Angelidaki, I.: Process performance and comparative metagenomic analysis during co-digestion of manure and lignocellulosic biomass for biogas production. Appl. Energy 185(1), 126–135 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hansupalak, N., Piromkraipak, P., Tamthirat, P., Manitsorasak, A., Sriroth, K., Tran, T.: Biogas reduces the carbon footprint of Cassava starch: a comparative assessment with fuel oil. J. Clean. Prod. 134, 539–546 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    McCarty, P.L., Bae, J., Kim, J.: Domestic wastewater treatment as a net energy producer—can this be achieved? Environ. Sci. Technol. 45, 7100–7106 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Nowak, O., Keil, S., Fimml, C.: Examples of energy self-sufficient municipal nutrient removal plants. Water Sci. Technol. 64, 1–6 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: “Closing the loop—An EU action plan for the Circular Economy”, COM/2015/0614 final (2015). Obtained at http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52015DC0614
  15. 15.
    Ramalakshmi, K., Rao, L.J.M., Takano-Ishikawa, Y., Goto, M.: Bioactivities of low-grade green coffee and spent coffee in different in vitro model systems. Food Chem. 115, 79–85 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Alves, R.C., Rodrigues, F., Nunes, M.A., Vinha, A.F., Oliveira, B.M.P.P.: Chap. 1—state of the art in coffee processing by-products. In: Galanakis, C.M. (ed.) Handbook of Coffee Processing By-Products, pp. 1–26. Academic Press, Cambridge (2017). (ISBN 9780128112908)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Murthy, P.S., Naidu, M.M.: Sustainable management of coffee industry by-products and value addition—a review. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 66, 45–58 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mussatto, S.I., Machado, E.M.S., Martins, S., Teixeira, J.A.: Production, composition, and application of coffee and its industrial residues. Food and Bioprocess Technol 4(5), 661–672 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Pujol, D., Liu, C., Gominho, J., Olivella, M., Fiol, N., Villaescusa, I., Pereira, H.: The chemical composition of exhausted coffee waste. Ind. Crops Prod. 50, 423–429 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mata, T.M., Martins, A.A., Caetano, N.S.: Bio-refinery approach for spent coffee grounds valorization. Bioresour. Technol. (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.09.106 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Nguyen, Q.A., Cho, E., Trinh, L.T.P., Jeong, J., Bae, H.: Development of an integrated process to produce d-mannose and bioethanol from coffee residue waste. Bioresour. Technol. 244, 1039–1048 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Karmee, S.K.A.: Spent coffee grounds based biorefinery for the production of biofuels, biopolymers, antioxidants and biocomposites. Waste Manage. 72, 240–254 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2017.10.042 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ike, M., Inoue, D., Miyano, T., Liu, T.T., Sei, K., Soda, S., Kadoshin, S.: Microbial population dynamics during startup of a full-scale anaerobic digester treating industrial food waste in Kyoto eco-energy project. Bioresour. Technol. 101, 3952–3957 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Li, Q., Qiao, W., Wang, X., Takayanagi, K., Shofie, M., Li, Y.-Y.: Kinetic characterization of thermophilic and mesophilic anaerobic digestion for coffee grounds and waste activated sludge. Waste Manage. 36, 77–85 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kim, J., Kim, H., Baek, G., Lee, C.: Anaerobic co-digestion of spent coffee grounds with different waste feedstocks for biogas production. Waste Manage. 60, 322–328 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Tuntiwiwattanapuna, N., Mononoc, E., Wiesenbornc, D., Tongcumpoub, C.: In-situ transesterification process for biodiesel production using spent coffee grounds from the instant coffee industry. Ind. Crops Prod. 102, 23–31 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Sousa, S. “Valorização energética de borras de cereais e café através da codigestão anaeróbia com chorume de porco”. Dissertation to obtain the Master Degree in Environmental Engineering. Instituto Superior de Agronomia, Universidade de Lisboa, Portugal (2016)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    APHA-American Public Health Association: Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. 22nd edn., APHA, Washington DC (2012)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Forgács, G., Claes, M.P., Mohammad, N., Taherzadeha, J., Hovátha, I.S.: Methane production from citrus wastes: process development and cost estimation. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 87, 250–255 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Cuetos, M.J., Fernández, C., Gómez, X.: Anaerobic co-digestion of swine manure with energy crop residues. Biotechnol. Bioproc. Eng. 16, 1044 (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12257-011-0117-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Mcpherson, C., Evans, P., Parry, D., Stenser, D., Hykes, T.: Anaerobic digestion and energy recovery from food waste. Proc. Water Environ. Fed. 1, 118–128 (2016)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Fonoll, X., Dosta, J., Mata-Alvaréz, J.: Anaerobic co-digestion of sewage sludges and fruit wastes: evaluation of the transitory states when the co-substrate is changed. Chem. Eng. J. 262, 1268–1274 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Carvalho, A., Fragoso, R., Gominho, J., Duarte, E.: The Challenge in Bioenergy Sector Through the Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Different Biowastes. In: Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Water, Energy and Environment (ICWEE), pp 35–50. American University of Sharjah, United Arab Emirates (2017)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Yenigȕn, O., Demirel, B.: Ammonia inhibition in anaerobic digestion: a review. Process Biochem. 48, 901–911 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.LEAF – Linking Landscape, Environment, Agriculture and Food, Instituto Superior de AgronomiaUniversidade de LisboaLisbonPortugal

Personalised recommendations