Advertisement

Denitrification of Nitric Oxide Using Hollow Fiber Membrane Bioreactor; Effect of Nitrate and Nitric Oxide Loadings on the Reactor Performance and Microbiology

  • Vahid Razaviarani
  • Melany Ruiz-Urigüen
  • Peter R. Jaffé
Original Paper
  • 57 Downloads

Abstract

Nitric oxide (NO) removal from a gas stream containing ~500 ppm NO was studied in a hollow fiber membrane (HFM) bioreactor. Compared to other biological NO removal methods the HFM bioreactor achieved NO removal rates that were as good if not better, of up to 92% NO removal, under comparable loadings and reactor size. Results showed that a wastewater stream containing organic carbon can be used as the electron donor to reduce the NO. Hence, combining biological NO treatment with treatment of a wastewater containing organic carbon has may be an effective overall cost-reducing strategy. The effect of different nitrate (NO 3 ) concentrations on the NO reduction rate was also evaluated, and results showed that NO 3 does enhance the NO removal rate. The reactor’s performance was studied under six different NO:NO 3 loading regimes and the NO removal rate as well as the microbial denitrifier community in the reactor was tracked. Specifically, the relevant genes responsible for each denitrification step were tracked during each different NO:NO 3 loading regime to the reactor. Results showed that the denitrifying microbial community adjust rapidly to changes in the different N loadings, but overall the performance of the reactor is robust and can withstand such variability in terms of NO, NO 3 and organic carbon removal.

Keywords

Nitric oxide (NO) Hollow fiber membrane Denitrification Microbial community Electron acceptor Waste treatment 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Funding for this work was provided by the Hebei Huafeng Coking & Power Co. The seed was provided by Dr. Eugenio Giraldo from NuOrganics LLC.

References

  1. 1.
    Dentener, F., et al.: Nitrogen and sulfur deposition on regional and global scales: a multimodel evaluation. Global Biogeochem. Cycles 20(4), GB4003 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    US-EPA: Nitrogen oxides (NOx) control regulations. https://www3.epa.gov/region1/airquality/nox.html (2015). Accessed 16 Oct 2017
  3. 3.
    Clais, P., Sabine, C.: IPCC report. Chapter 6: carbon and other biogeochemical cycles (2013)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wei, Z.S., et al.: Coupling membrane catalysis and biodegradation for nitric oxide removal in a novel hybird catalytic membrane biofilm reactor. Chem. Eng. J. 296, 154–161 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Molina, M.J., Molina, L.T.: Megacities and atmospheric pollution. J. Air Waste Manag. Assoc. 54(6), 644–680 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Weinberger, B., et al.: The toxicology of inhaled nitric oxide. Toxicol. Sci. 59, 5–16 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pandey, R., Chandrashekhar, B.: Physicochemical and biochemical approaches for treatment of gaseous emissions containing NOx. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 44(1), 34–96 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Li, Z., et al.: Effect of selective catalytic reduction (SCR) on fine particle emission from two coal-fired power plants in China. Atmos. Environ. 120, 227–233 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chen, J., et al.: Dynamic model for nitric oxide removal by a rotating drum biofilter. J. Hazard. Mater. 168(2–3), 1047–1052 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wei, L., et al.: Removal of nitric oxide in a biotrickling filter under thermophilic condition using Chelatococcus daeguensis. J. Air Waste Manag. Assoc. 62(5), 509–516 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hiroyasu, N., et al.: Uptake pathway and continuous removal of nitric oxide from flue gas using microalgae. Biochem. Eng. J. 7(3), 241–246 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jun, C., et al.: Effect of key parameters on nitric oxide removal by anaerobic rotating drum biofilters. Environ. Technol. 29(11), 1241–1247 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Buisman, C.J.N., et al.: Process for purifying flue gas containing nitrogen oxides (1999)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    van der Maas, P., et al.: NOx removal from flue gas by an integrated physicochemical absorption and biological denitrification process. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 90(4), 433–441 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    van der Maas, P., et al.: Enzymatic versus nonenzymatic conversions during the reduction of EDTA-chelated Fe(III) in BioDeNOx reactors. Environ. Sci. Technol. 39(8), 2616–2623 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zhang, X., et al.: Removal of nitric oxide from simulated flue gas via denitrification in a hollow-fiber membrane bioreactor. J. Environ. Sci. 25(11), 2239–2246 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Min, K.-N., Ergas, S.J., Harrison, J.M.: Hollow-fiber membrane bioreactor for nitric oxide removal. Environ. Eng. Sci. 19(6), 575–583 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kumar, A., et al.: Modeling of a hollow fiber membrane biofilm reactor for nitric oxide removal: Model development and experimental validation. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 85(3), 423–428 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Li, W., Wu, C.-Z., Shi, Y.: Metal chelate absorption coupled with microbial reduction for removal of NOx from flu gas. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 81(3), 306–311 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Durmazpinar, S., et al.: Biological NOx removal by denitrification process in a jet-loop bioreactor: system performance and model development. Environ. Technol. 35(9–12), 1358–1366 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wei, L., et al.: Biological reduction integrated system: complexed NO conversion pathways and nitrogen equilibrium analysis. Energy Fuels 28(7), 4725–4730 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Niu, H., et al.: Nitric oxide removal by wastewater bacteria in a biotrickling filter. J. Environ. Sci. 26(3), 555–565 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hanaki, K., Hong, Z., Matsuo, T.: Production of nitrous oxide gas during denitrification of wastewater. Water Sci. Technol. 26(5–6), 1027–1036 (1992)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Glassa, C., Silversteinb, J.: Denitrification kinetics of high nitrate concentration water: pH effect on inhibition and nitrite accumulation. Water Res. 32(3), 831–839 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Petersen, D.G., et al.: Abundance of microbial genes associated with nitrogen cycling as indices of biogeochemical process rates across a vegetation gradient in Alaska. Environ. Microbiol. 14(4), 993–1008 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Reyna, L., Wunderlin, D.A., Genti-Raimondi, S.: Identification and quantification of a novel nitrate-reducing community in sediments of Suquia River basin along a nitrate gradient. Environ. Pollut. 158(5), 1608–1614 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Braker, G., Fesefeldt, A., Witzel, K.P.: Development of PCR primer systems for amplification of nitrite reductase genes (nirK and nirS) to detect denitrifying bacteria in environmental samples. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 64(10), 3769–3775 (1998)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Braker, G., Tiedje, J.M.: Nitric oxide reductase (norB) genes from pure cultures and environmental samples. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 69(6), 3476–3483 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Scala, D.J., Kerkhof, L.J.: Nitrous oxide reductase (nosZ) gene-specific PCR primers for detection of denitri¢ers and three nosZ genes from marine sediments. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 162, 61–68 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Harms, G., et al.: Real-time PCR quantification of nitrifying bacteria in a municipal wastewater treatment plant. Environ. Sci. Technol. 37, 343–351 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Chung, Y.-C., Chung, M.-S.: BNP test to evaluate the influence of C/N ratio on N2O production in biological denitrification. Water Sci. Technol. 42(3–4), 23–27 (2000)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Pan, Y., et al.: Effect of pH on N2O reduction and accumulation during denitrification by methanol utilizing denitrifiers. Water Res. 46(15), 4832–4840 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vahid Razaviarani
    • 1
  • Melany Ruiz-Urigüen
    • 2
  • Peter R. Jaffé
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Chemical EngineeringAmerican University of the Middle EastEgailaKuwait
  2. 2.Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringPrinceton UniversityPrincetonUSA

Personalised recommendations