Abstract
The effect of the sulfur load on anaerobic digestion of chicken manure (CM) was investigated in a laboratory scale anaerobic mono-digester at high total ammonia nitrogen (TAN) concentrations. The digester was operated for 268 days by increasing the organic loading rate from 0.5 to 2.5 kg-VS/m3/day and the total Kjeldahl nitrogen up to 5050 mg/l. The CH4 yield of 0.36 ± 0.02 m3/kg-VS was achieved at 2.5 kg-VS/m3/day of loading rate without any inhibition. The results showed that, anaerobic mono-digestion of chicken manure was applicable with the acclimation of microbial consortium to high TAN concentrations. However, when the sulfur content of the CM fed to the digester increased suddenly by coincidence, the CH4 yield decreased about 25% from 0.36 ± 0.02 to 0.27 ± 0.03 m3/kg-VS. As a result, the acetic acid concentration increased from 130 to 1700 mg/l showing that the acetate consuming methanogens were detrimentally affected from TAN and total sulfide concentrations above 4000 and 100 mg/l, respectively.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Huang, W., Zhao, Z., Yuan, T., Lei, Z., Cai, W., Li, H., Zhang, Z.: Effective ammonia recovery from swine excreta through dry anaerobic digestion followed by ammonia stripping at high total solids content. Biomass Bioenergy. 90, 139–147 (2016). doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2016.04.003
Sun, C., Cao, W., Banks, C.J., Heaven, S., Liu, R.: Biogas production from undiluted chicken manure and maize silage: a study of ammonia inhibition in high solids anaerobic digestion. Bioresour. Technol. 218, 1215–1223 (2016). doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2016.07.082
Stutzenstein, P., Bacher, M., Rosenau, T., Pfeifer, C.: Optimization of nutrient and carbon recovery from anaerobic digestate via hydrothermal carbonization and investigation of the influence of the process parameters. Waste Biomass Valorization (2017). doi:10.1007/s12649-017-9902-4
Yuan, H., Zhu, N.: Progress in inhibition mechanisms and process control of intermediates and by-products in sewage sludge anaerobic digestion. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 58, 429–438 (2016). doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.261
Neerackal, G.M., Ndegwa, P.M., Joo, H.S., Wang, X., Harrison, J.H., Heber, A.J., Ni, J.Q., Frear, C.: Effects of anaerobic digestion and solids separation on ammonia emissions from stored and land applied dairy manure. Water Air Soil Pollut. 226(9) (2015). doi:10.1007/s11270-015-2561-9
Cerrillo, M., Vinas, M., Bonmati, A.: Removal of volatile fatty acids and ammonia recovery from instable anaerobic digesters with a microbial electrolysis cell. Bioresour. Technol. (2016). doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2016.07.103
Bujoczek, G., Oleszkiewicz, J., Sparling, R., Cenkowski, S.: High solid anaerobic digestion of chicken manure. J. Agric. Eng. Res. 76(1), 51–60 (2000). doi:10.1006/jaer.2000.0529
Abouelenien, F., Namba, Y., Kosseva, M.R., Nishio, N., Nakashimada, Y.: Enhancement of methane production from co-digestion of chicken manure with agricultural wastes. Bioresour. Technol. 159, 80–87 (2014). doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2014.02.050
Sürmeli, R.O., Bayrakdar, A., Çalli, B.: Removal and recovery of ammonia from chicken manure. Water Sci. Technol. wst2017116 (2017). doi:10.2166/wst.2017.116
Nie, H., Jacobi, H.F., Strach, K., Xu, C., Zhou, H., Liebetrau, J.: Mono-fermentation of chicken manure: ammonia inhibition and recirculation of the digestate. Bioresour. Technol. 178, 238–246 (2015). doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2014.09.029
Niu, Q., Qiao, W., Qiang, H., Hojo, T., Li, Y.Y.: Mesophilic methane fermentation of chicken manure at a wide range of ammonia concentration: stability, inhibition and recovery. Bioresour. Technol. 137, 358–367 (2013). doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2013.03.080
Sinkiewicz, I., Śliwińska, A., Staroszczyk, H., Kołodziejska, I.: Alternative methods of preparation of soluble keratin from chicken feathers. Waste Biomass Valorization. 8(4), 1043–1048 (2016). doi:10.1007/s12649-016-9678-y
Bragulla, H.H., Homberger, D.G.: Structure and functions of keratin proteins in simple, stratified, keratinized and cornified epithelia. J. Anat. 214(4), 516–559 (2009). doi:10.1111/j.1469-7580.2009.01066.x
Thyagarajan, D., Barathi, M., Sakthivadivu, R.: Scope of poultry waste utilization. IOSR J. Agric. Vet. Sci. (IOSR-JAVS). 6(5), 29–35 (2013). doi:10.9790/2380-0653644
Bunchasak, C.: Role of dietary methionine in poultry production. J. Poult. Sci. 46(3), 169–179 (2009)
Chen, Y., Cheng, J.J., Creamer, K.S.: Inhibition of anaerobic digestion process: a review. Bioresour. Technol. 99(10), 4044–4064 (2008). doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2007.01.057
Paulo, L.M., Stams, A.J.M., Sousa, D.Z.: Methanogens, sulphate and heavy metals: a complex system. Rev. Environ. Sci. Bio/Technol. 14(4), 537–553 (2015). doi:10.1007/s11157-015-9387-1
Speece, R.E.: Anaerobic biotechnology for industrial wastewater treatment. Environ. Sci. Technol. 17(9), 416A-427A (1983)
Clanton, C.J., Schmidt, D.R.: Sulfur compounds in gases emitted from stored manure. Trans. ASAE. 43(5), 1229–1239 (2000)
Boyd, C.E.: Water quality: an introduction. Springer, New York (2015)
Parkin, G.F., Lynch, N.A., Kuo, W.-C., Van Keuren, E.L., Bhattacharya, S.K.: Interaction between sulfate reducers and methanogens fed acetate and propionate. Res. J. Water Pollut. Control Fed. 780–788 (1990)
Gerardi, M.H.: The microbiology of anaerobic digesters. Wiley, Hoboken (2003)
McCartney, D.M., Oleszkiewicz, J.A.: Competition between methanogens and sulfate reducers: effect of COD:sulfate ratio and acclimation. Water Environ. Res. 65(5), 655–664 (1993). doi:10.2175/wer.65.5.8
Jankowski, J., Kubińska, M., Zduńczyk, Z.: Nutritional and immunomodulatory function of methionine in poultry diets—a review. Ann. Anim. Sci. 14(1), (2014). doi:10.2478/aoas-2013-0081
Meng, G.H., Song, D., Li, L.B., Yang, C.J., Qu, Z.X., Gao, Y.P.: Dietary methionine requirement of Jing Brown layer hens from 9 to 17 weeks of age. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. (Berl) (2016). doi:10.1111/jpn.12525
Zhan, X.A., Li, J.X., Xu, Z.R., Zhao, R.Q.: Effects of methionine and betaine supplementation on growth performance, carcase composition and metabolism of lipids in male broilers. Br. Poult. Sci. 47(5), 576–580 (2006). doi:10.1080/00071660600963438
Federation, W.E., Association, A.P.H.: Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. American Public Health Association (APHA), Washington, DC (2005)
Bayrakdar, A., Molaey, R., Sürmeli, R.Ö., Sahinkaya, E., Çalli, B.: Biogas production from chicken manure: co-digestion with spent poppy straw. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 119, 205–210 (2017). doi:10.1016/j.ibiod.2016.10.058
Calli, B., Mertoglu, B., Inanc, B., Yenigun, O.: Effects of high free ammonia concentrations on the performances of anaerobic bioreactors. Process Biochem. 40(3–4), 1285–1292 (2005). doi:10.1016/j.procbio.2004.05.008
Bayrakdar, A., Tilahun, E., Calli, B.: Biogas desulfurization using autotrophic denitrification process. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 100(2), 939–948 (2016)
Koster, I.W.: Toxicity in anaerobic digestion with emphasis on the effect of ammonia, sulfide and long-chain fatty acids on methanogenesis. Koster (1989)
Zeeman, G.: Mesophylic and psychrophilic digestion of liquid manure. Zeeman (1991)
Quiroga, G., Castrillon, L., Fernandez-Nava, Y., Maranon, E.: Physico-chemical analysis and calorific values of poultry manure. Waste Manag. 30(5), 880–884 (2010). doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2009.12.016
Wu, S., Ni, P., Li, J., Sun, H., Wang, Y., Luo, H., Dach, J., Dong, R.: Integrated approach to sustain biogas production in anaerobic digestion of chicken manure under recycled utilization of liquid digestate: dynamics of ammonium accumulation and mitigation control. Bioresour. Technol. 205, 75–81 (2016). doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2016.01.021
Hansen, K.H., Angelidaki, I., Ahring, B.K.: Improving thermophilic anaerobic digestion of swine manure. Water Res. 33(8), 1805–1810 (1999)
Zhou, X., Chen, C., Wang, A., Liu, L.H., Ho, K.L., Ren, N., Lee, D.J.: Rapid acclimation of methanogenic granular sludge into denitrifying sulfide removal granules. Bioresour. Technol. 102(8), 5244–5247 (2011). doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2011.01.049
van Hullebusch, E.D., Guibaud, G., Simon, S., Lenz, M., Yekta, S.S., Fermoso, F.G., Jain, R., Duester, L., Roussel, J., Guillon, E., Skyllberg, U., Almeida, C.M.R., Pechaud, Y., Garuti, M., Frunzo, L., Esposito, G., Carliell-Marquet, C., Ortner, M., Collins, G.: Methodological approaches for fractionation and speciation to estimate trace element bioavailability in engineered anaerobic digestion ecosystems: an overview. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 46(16), 1324–1366 (2016). doi:10.1080/10643389.2016.1235943
Gustavsson, J., Yekta, S.S., Sundberg, C., Karlsson, A., Ejlertsson, J., Skyllberg, U., Svensson, B.H.: Bioavailability of cobalt and nickel during anaerobic digestion of sulfur-rich stillage for biogas formation. Appl. Energy 112, 473–477 (2013). doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.02.009
Acknowledgements
Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TÜBİTAK) financially supported this study [Project Number: 113Y333].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sürmeli, R.Ö., Bayrakdar, A., Molaey, R. et al. Synergistic Effect of Sulfide and Ammonia on Anaerobic Digestion of Chicken Manure. Waste Biomass Valor 10, 609–615 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-017-0090-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-017-0090-z