Waste and Biomass Valorization

, Volume 10, Issue 3, pp 721–732 | Cite as

Pelletized Composite Wood Fiber Mixed with Plastic as Advanced Solid Biofuels: Physico-Chemo-Mechanical Analysis

  • E. Madadian
  • A. H. AkbarzadehEmail author
  • V. Orsat
  • M. Lefsrud
Original Paper


The purpose of this study was to evaluate the physico-chemo-mechanical performance of composite wood residue pellets blended with plastic wastes as potential feedstocks for producing advanced biofuels through gasification technology. The composite pellets of wood fiber and plastics were compressed longitudinally and laterally using a universal testing machine to evaluate their mechanical properties. The compression test results showed that pellets with larger diameters have higher elastic limits. With respect to the transverse direction, there was no certain relationship between stress–strain values and pellet sizes. The incompatibility in the relation between the increase of yield stress and diameter was attributed to the unknown type of plastics used in the composite plastic wood pellets. As a consequence, we predicted the type of plastics used in the composites using the rule of mixture considering the Young’s modulus of composites and the wood fiber as well as the volume fractions of the constituents. We also measured the angle of repose of the composite wood pellets, which ranged between 25° for the largest samples to 41° for the smallest pellets implying that the pellets with smaller diameters have lower chance of slumping in the feeding drum during gasification. It was also shown that the angle of repose would increase with the moisture content in all the composite pellets. Larger pellet size with higher bulk density demonstrated smaller angle of repose. The chemical analysis was presented in conjunction with microscopic imaging to understand the microstructural interaction between plastic and wood fibers in the composite pellets.


Mechanical characterization Angle of repose Gasification Elemental chemical analysis Composite pellet 



This research is funded by BioFuelNet Canada, a network focusing on the development of advanced biofuels. BioFuelNet is a member of the Networks of Centres of Excellence of Canada program. Authors would like to also acknowledge the contribution of Dr. Nima Gharib from the Mechanical and ​Materials Engineering Department of McGill University for conducting the microscopic imaging of the pelletized composites.


  1. 1.
    Verma, V., Bram, S., Delattin, F., Laha, P., Vandendael, I., Hubin, A., De Ruyck, J.: Agro-pellets for domestic heating boilers: Standard laboratory and real life performance. Appl. Energy 90(1), 17–23 (2012)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Verma, V., Bram, S., De Ruyck, J.: Small scale biomass heating systems: standards, quality labelling and market driving factors–an EU outlook. Biomass Bioenerg. 33(10), 1393–1402 (2009)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Madadian, E., Crowe, C., Lefsrud, M.: Evaluation of composite fiber-plastics biomass clinkering under the gasification conditions. J. Cleaner Prod. (2017). doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.070 Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Acda, M.N.: Physico-chemical properties of wood pellets from coppice of short rotation tropical hardwoods. Fuel 160, 531–533 (2015)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Di Giacomo, G., Taglieri, L.: Renewable energy benefits with conversion of woody residues to pellets. Energy 34(5), 724–731 (2009)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Heinimö, J., Junginger, M.: Production and trading of biomass for energy–an overview of the global status. Biomass Bioenergy 33(9), 1310–1320 (2009)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Guo, L., Wang, D., Tabil, L.G., Wang, G.: Compression and relaxation properties of selected biomass for briquetting. Biosyst. Eng. 148, 101–110 (2016)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lamers, P., Junginger, M., Hamelinck, C., Faaij, A.: Developments in international solid biofuel trade—an analysis of volumes, policies, and market factors. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 16(5), 3176–3199 (2012)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Peng, J., Bi, H., Sokhansanj, S., Lim, J., Melin, S.: An economical and market analysis of Canadian wood pellets. Int. J. Green Energy 7(2), 128–142 (2010)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
  11. 11.
    Larsson, S.H., Thyrel, M., Geladi, P., Lestander, T.A.: High quality biofuel pellet production from pre-compacted low density raw materials. Bioresour. Technol. 99(15), 7176–7182 (2008)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Diop, C.I.K., Lavoie, J.-M.: Isolation of nanocrystalline cellulose: a technological route for valorizing recycled tetra pak aseptic multilayered food packaging wastes. Waste Biomass Valorizat. 8, 41–56 (2017)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ashori, A., Nourbakhsh, A.: Characteristics of wood–fiber plastic composites made of recycled materials. Waste Manag. 29(4), 1291–1295 (2009)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kuo, P.-Y., Wang, S.-Y., Chen, J.-H., Hsueh, H.-C., Tsai, M.-J.: Effects of material compositions on the mechanical properties of wood–plastic composites manufactured by injection molding. Mater. Des. 30(9), 3489–3496 (2009)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Nuñez, A.J., Sturm, P.C., Kenny, J.M., Aranguren, M., Marcovich, N.E., Reboredo, M.M.: Mechanical characterization of polypropylene–wood flour composites. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 88(6), 1420–1428 (2003)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Cui, Y., Lee, S., Noruziaan, B., Cheung, M., Tao, J.: Fabrication and interfacial modification of wood/recycled plastic composite materials. Compos. Part A 39(4), 655–661 (2008)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hannequart, J.: Good practice guide on waste plastics recycling: a guide by and for local and regional authorities. Association of cities and regions for recycling (ACRR), Belgium (2004)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Adhikary, K.B., Pang, S., Staiger, M.P.: Dimensional stability and mechanical behaviour of wood–plastic composites based on recycled and virgin high-density polyethylene (HDPE). Compos. Part B 39(5), 807–815 (2008)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Tunde-Akintunde, T., Olajide, J., Akintunde, B.: Mass-volume-area related and mechanical properties of soybean as a function of moisture and variety. Int. J. Food Prop. 8(3), 449–456 (2005)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Madadian, E., Orsat, V., Lefsrud, M.: Comparative study of temperature impact on air gasification of various types of biomass in a research-scale down-draft reactor. Energy Fuels. 31(4), 4045–4053 (2017)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Temmerman, M., Rabier, F., Jensen, P.D., Hartmann, H., Böhm, T.: Comparative study of durability test methods for pellets and briquettes. Biomass Bioenerg. 30(11), 964–972 (2006)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Williams, J., Gamonpilas, C.: Using the simple compression test to determine Young’s modulus, Poisson’s ratio and the Coulomb friction coefficient. Int. J. Solids Struct. 45(16), 4448–4459 (2008)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Zhao, Y., Liu, H.-H.: An elastic stress–strain relationship for porous rock under anisotropic stress conditions. Rock Mechanics Rock Eng. 45(3), 389–399 (2012)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Madadian, E., Lefsrud, M., Lee, C.P., Roy, Y., Orsat, V.: Gasification of pelletized woody biomass using a downdraft reactor and impact of material bridging. J. Energy Eng. 142(4), 04016001 (2016)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Rezaei, H., Yazdanpanah, F., Lim, C.J., Lau, A., Sokhansanj, S.: Pyrolysis of ground pine chip and ground pellet particles. Can. J. Chem. Eng. 94, 1863–1871 (2016)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Sokhansanj, S., Webb, E.: Evaluating industrial drying of cellulosic feedstock for bioenergy: a systems approach. Biofuels Bioprod. Biorefin. 10(1), 47–55 (2016)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Zhong, Y., Poloso, T., Hetzer, M., De Kee, D.: Enhancement of wood/polyethylene composites via compatibilization and incorporation of organoclay particles. Polym. Eng. Sci. 47(6), 797–803 (2007)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Madadian, E., Akbarzadeh, A., Lefsrud, M.: Pelletized composite wood fiber mixed with plastic as advanced solid biofuels: thermo-chemical analysis. Waste Biomass Valorizat. 1–15 (2017)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    ASTM: Standard test method for moisture analysis of particulate wood fuels. ASTM E871-82, West Conshohocken (2013)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    ASTM: Standard test method for ash in wood. ASTM D1102-84, West Conshohocken (2013)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    ASTM: Standard test methods for analysis of wood fuels. ASTM E870-82, West Conshohocken (2013)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    ASTM: Standard test method for volatile matter in the analysis of particulate wood fuels. ASTM E872–882, West Conshohocken (2013)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    ASTM: ASTM D6683-14, standard test method for measuring bulk density values of powders and other bulk solids as function of compressive stress. ASTM, West Conshohocken (2014)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Mohsenin, N.N.: Physical properties of plant and animial materials. vol. 1. Structure, physical characterisitics and mechanical properties. Physical properties of plant and animial materials. vol. 1. Structure, physical characterisitics and mechanical properties. 1 (1970)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Basu, P.: Biomass gasification, pyrolysis and torrefaction: practical design and theory. Academic press, Cambridge (2013)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Ritchie, R.O.: The conflicts between strength and toughness. Nat. Mater. 10(11), 817–822 (2011)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Panda, B.P., Mohanty, S., Nayak, S.: Mechanical behavior and fracture toughness evaluation of multiphase polymer nanocomposites using impact and-integral via locus method. Chin. J. Eng. 2013 (2013)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Tso, I.M., Chiang, S.Y., Blackledge, T.A.: Does the giant wood spider Nephila pilipes respond to prey variation by altering web or silk properties? Ethology 113(4), 324–333 (2007)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Huang, X., Shen, J., Qian, X.: Filler modification for papermaking with starch/oleic acid complexes with the aid of calcium ions. Carbohydr. Polym. 98(1), 931–935 (2013)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Chauhan, V.S., Bhardwaj, N.K., Chakrabarti, S.K.: Effect of particle size of magnesium silicate filler on physical properties of paper. Can. J. Chem. Eng. 91(5), 855–861 (2013)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Chen, X., Wu, S., Zhou, J.: Influence of porosity on compressive and tensile strength of cement mortar. Constr. Build. Mater. 40, 869–874 (2013)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Akbarzadeh, A., Abbasi, M., Eslami, M.: Dynamic analysis of functionally graded plates using the hybrid Fourier-Laplace transform under thermomechanical loading. Meccanica 46(6), 1373–1392 (2011)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Gkinosatis, D.: Thin film for waste packing cassettes. In. Google Patents, (2009)Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Curbell Plastics, I.: Plastic properties table. (2016)
  45. 45.
    Popvics, S.: Method for developing relationships between mechanical properties of hardened concrete. J. Proc. 12, 795–798 (1973)Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Akbarzadeh, A., Fu, J., Liu, L., Chen, Z., Pasini, D.: Electrically conducting sandwich cylinder with a planar lattice core under prescribed eigenstrain and magnetic field. Compos. Struct. 153, 632–644 (2016)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • E. Madadian
    • 1
  • A. H. Akbarzadeh
    • 1
    Email author
  • V. Orsat
    • 1
  • M. Lefsrud
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Bioresource EngineeringMcGill UniversitySainte-Anne-de-BellevueCanada

Personalised recommendations