Waste and Biomass Valorization

, Volume 8, Issue 6, pp 2037–2043 | Cite as

The Effects of Salinity, pH and Temperature on the Performance of a Microbial Fuel Cell

  • Asimina Tremouli
  • Michalis Martinos
  • Gerasimos Lyberatos
Original Paper
First Online:
Received:
Accepted:

Abstract

Purpose

In order to develop microbial fuel cells (MFCs) as a wastewater treatment technology, it is necessary to investigate the performance of these systems under various operating conditions. This study investigated the effect of salinity, pH and temperature on the performance of a dual chamber MFC.

Methods

All experiments were conducted in batch mode using synthetic wastewater as a medium (based on approximately 0.55 gCOD/L glucose). The performance was evaluated in terms of chemical oxygen demand (COD) removal efficiency, coulombic efficiency (CE) and power production.

Results

Good electrochemical performance (Pmax 66 mW/m2) and COD removal efficiency (70 %) were maintained up to a salinity of 4.1 g/L, but Pmax decreased by 92 % and COD removal by 25.3 %, as the salinity was raised to 6.7 g/L. The optimum CE (13 %) was achieved at 4.1 g/L. Maximum power density was improved by 37 % (Pmax 50.6 mW/m2) as the pH of the anolyte was increased from 6 to 9, while the optimum CE (15 %) was achieved at pH 7. Moreover, maximum power density and CE were both improved by 64 % (Pmax 59 mW/m2) and 211 % (CE 14 %), when the operating temperature was raised from 24 to 35 °C. The COD removal efficiency remained approximately constant (75–80 %) for all pH and temperature changes.

Main Conclusions

These results indicate the great influence of salinity, pH and temperature on MFC performance in terms of power generation and wastewater treatment.

Keywords

Microbial fuel cell Salinity PH Temperature 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research has been co-financed by the European Union (European Social Fund—ESF) and Greek national funds through the Operational Program “Education and Lifelong Learning” of the National Strategic Reference Framework (NSRF)—Research Funding Program: Heracleitus II. Investing in knowledge society through the European Social Fund.

References

  1. 1.
    Potter, M.C.: Electrical effects accompanying the decomposition of organic compounds. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B Contain Pap Biol Character 48, 260–276 (1911)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Du, Z.W., Li, H.R., Gu, T.Y.: A state of the art review on microbial fuel cells: a promising technology for wastewater treatment and bioenergy. Biotechnol. Adv. 25, 464–482 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lu, N., Zhou, S., Zhuang, L., Zhang, J., Ni, J.: Electricity generation from starch processing wastewater using microbial fuel cell technology. Biochem. Eng. J. 43, 246–251 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lefebvre, O., Moletta, R.: Treatment of organic pollution in industrial saline wastewater: a literature review. Water Res. 40(20), 3671–3682 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lefebvre, O., Tan, Z., Kharkwal, S., Ng, H.Y.: Effect of increasing anodic NaCl concentration on microbial fuel cell performance. Bioresour. Technol. 112, 336–340 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Adelaja, O., Keshavarz, T., Kyazze, G.: The effect of salinity, redox mediators and temperature on anaerobic biodegradation of petroleum hydrocarbons in microbial fuel cells. J. Hazard. Mater. 283, 211–217 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Liu, H., Cheng, S., Logan, B.E.: Power generation in fed-batch microbial fuel cells as a function of ionic strength, temperature, and reactor configuration. Environ. Sci. Technol. 39, 5488–5493 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tremouli, A., Intzes, A., Intzes, P., Bebelis, S., Lyberatos, G.: Effect of periodic complete anolyte replacement on the long term performance of a four air cathodes single chamber microbial fuel cell. J. Appl. Electrochem. 45, 755–763 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Oliveira, V.B., Simões, M., Melo, L.F., Pinto, A.M.F.R.: Overview on the developments of microbial fuel cells. Biochem. Eng. J. 73, 53–64 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    He, Z., Huang, Y., Manohar, A.K., Mansfeld, F.: Effect of electrolyte pH on the rate of the anodic and cathodic reactions in an air-cathode microbial fuel cell. Bioelectrochemistry 74(1), 78–82 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Puig, S., Serra, M., Coma, M., Cabrι, M., Balaguer, M.D., Colprim, J.: Effect of pH on nutrient dynamics and electricity production using microbial fuel cells. Bioresour. Technol. 101, 9594–9599 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Yuan, Y., Zhao, B., Zhou, S., Zhong, S., Zhuang, L.: Electrocatalytic activity of anodic biofilm responses to pH changes in microbial fuel cells. Bioresour. Technol. 102, 6887–6891 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Guerrero, A.L., Scott, K., Head, I.M., Mateo, F., Ginesta, A., Godinez, C.: Effect of temperature on the performance of microbial fuel cells. Fuel 89, 3985–3994 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ahn, Y., Logan, B.E.: Effectiveness of domestic wastewater treatment using microbial fuel cells at ambient and mesophilic temperatures. Bioresource Technol. 101, 469–475 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Jadhav, G.S., Ghangrekar, M.M.: Performance of microbial fuel cell subjected to variation in pH, temperature, external load and substrate concentration. Bioresour. Technol. 100, 717–723 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Michie, I.S., Kim, J.R., Dinsdale, R.M., Guwy, A.J., Premier, G.C.: The influence of psychrophilic and mesophilic start-up temperature on microbial fuel cell system performance. Energy Environ. Sci. 4(3), 1011–1019 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Antonopoulou, G., Stamatelatou, K., Bebelis, S., Lyberatos, G.: Electricity generation from synthetic substrates and cheese whey using a two chamber microbial fuel cell. Biochem. Eng. J. 50, 10–15 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Tremouli, A., Antonopoulou, G., Bebelis, S., Lyberatos, G.: Operation and characterization of a microbial fuel cell fed with pretreated cheese whey at different organic loads. Bioresour. Technol. 131, 380–389 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Logan, B.E.: Microbial Fuel Cells. Wiley, New Jersey (2008)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Logan, B.E., Hamelers, B., Rozendal, R., Schröder, U., Keller, J., Freguia, S., Aelterman, P., Verstraete, W., Rabaey, K.: Microbial fuel cells: methodology and technology. Environ. Sci. Technol. 40, 5181–5192 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    APHA, AWWA, WEF: Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 20th edn. American Public Health Association, Washington, DC (1998)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    He, Z., Minteer, S., Angenent, L.: Electricity generation from artificial wastewater using an upflow microbial fuel cell. Environ. Sci. Technol. 39, 5262–5267 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Nam, J.Y., Kim, H.W., Lim, K.H., Shin, H.S., Logan, B.E.: Variation of power generation at different buffer types and conductivities in single chamber microbial fuel cells. Biosens. Bioelectron. 25, 1155–1159 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Cheng, S., Logan, B.E.: Increasing power generation for scaling up single-chamber air cathode microbial fuel cell. Bioresour. Technol. 102, 4468–4473 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Zhao, F., Harnisch, F., Schröder, U., Scholz, F., Bogdanoff, P., Herrmann, I.: Challenges and constraints of using oxygen cathodes in microbial fuel cells. Environ. Sci. Technol. 40, 5191–5199 (2006)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Schlegel, H.G.: General Microbiology, 7th edn. Cambridge University Press, London (1993)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Behera, M., Ghangrekar, M.M.: Performance of microbial fuel cells in response to change in sludge loading rate at different anodic feed pH. Bioresour. Technol. 100, 5114–5121 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Campo, A.G., Lobato, J., Canizares, P., Rodrigo, M.A., Morales, F.J.F.: Short-term effects of temperature and COD in a microbial fuel cell. Appl. Energ. 101, 213–217 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Patil, S.A., Harnisch, F., Kapadnis, B., Schröder, U.: Electroactive mixed culture biofilms in microbial bioelectrochemical systems: the role of temperature for biofilm formation and performance. Biosens. Bioelectron. 26, 803–808 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Wang, X., Feng, Y.J., Qu, Y.P., Li, D.M., Li, H., Ren, N.Q.: Effect of temperature on performance of microbial fuel cell using beer wastewater. Huanjing Kexue/Environ. Sci. 29, 3128–3132 (2008)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Min, Β., Roman, Ο.Β.: I. Angelidaki, Ι.: importance of temperature and anodic medium composition on microbial fuel cell (MFC) performance. Biotechnol. Lett. 30, 1213–1218 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Liu, Y., Climent, V., Berna, A., Feliu, J.M.: Effect of temperature on the catalytic ability of electrochemically active biofilm as anode catalyst in microbial fuel cells. Electroanal. 23, 387–394 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Asimina Tremouli
    • 1
    • 2
  • Michalis Martinos
    • 2
  • Gerasimos Lyberatos
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Chemical EngineeringUniversity of PatrasPatrasGreece
  2. 2.School of Chemical EngineeringNational Technical University of AthensAthensGreece
  3. 3.Institute of Chemical Engineering SciencesPatrasGreece

Personalised recommendations