Waste and Biomass Valorization

, Volume 5, Issue 5, pp 759–772 | Cite as

Evaluation of Environmental Compatibility for a Biomass Plant

  • Deborah Panepinto
  • Francesca Viggiano
  • Giuseppe Genon
Original Paper
First Online:
Received:
Accepted:

Abstract

The aim of this work was to determine the local compatibility of a biomass plant to be constructed in a small town located in Piedmont, northern Italy, to produce both electricity and heat. In order to study both the local critical impacts (on air quality) and the overall environmental benefits (decrease of GHG generation), we performed an evaluation of the emissive flow modification for the hypothesis of activating the biomass plant in the municipal area, by considering introduced and eliminated pollutant loads. The evaluation was conducted using the tools of mass and energy balances, evaluating the pollution fluxes with an external costs methodology and pollutant dispersion models. These conclusions, numerically defined for the specific situation studied, can be considered to be fairly representative as a methodological approach to studying the effects of biomass energy plants.

Keywords

Biomass plant District heating Environmental balance Environmental impact Energy recovery Externalities evaluation 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. 1.
    Appels, L., Dewil, R.: Biomass valorization to energy and value added chemicals: the future of chemical industry. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 59, 1–3 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Boman, U.R., Turnbull, J.H.: Integrated biomass energy systems and emissions of carbon dioxide. Biomass Bioenergy 13, 333–343 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dornburg, V., Van Dam, J., Faaij, A.: Estimating GHG emission mitigation supply curves of large-scale biomass use an a country level. Biomass Bioenergy 31, 46–65 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Laurijssena, J., Marsidi, M., Westenbroek, A., Worrell, E., Faaij, A.: Paper and biomass for energy? The impact of paper recycling on energy and CO2 emissions. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 54, 1208–1218 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Albertazzi, S., Basile, F., Brandin, J., Einvall, J., Hulteberg, C., Fornasari, G., Rosetti, V., Sanati, M., Trifirò, F., Vaccari, A.: The technical feasibility of biomass gasification for hydrogen production. Catal. Today 106, 297–300 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Amutio, M., Lopez, G., Artetxe, M., Elordi, G., Olazar, M., Bilbao, J.: Influence of temperature on biomass pyrolysis in a conical spouted bed reactor. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 59, 23–31 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bridgwater, A.V.: The technical and economic feasibility of biomass gasification for power generation. Fuel 74, 631–653 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Caputo, A.C., Palumbo, M., Pelagagge, P.M., Scacchia, F.: Economics of biomass energy utilization in combustion and gasification plants: effects of logistic variables. Biomass Bioenergy 28, 35–51 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hanaoka, T., Inove, S., Uno, S., Ogi, T., Minowa, T.: Effect of woody biomass components on air–steam gasification. Biomass Bioenergy 28, 69–76 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hohenstein, W.G., Wright, L.L.: Biomass energy production in the United States: an overview. Biomass Bioenergy 6, 161–173 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hustad, J., Skreiberg, Ø., Sonju, O.: Biomass combustion research and utilization in IEA countries. Biomass Bioenergy 9, 235–255 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Panepinto, D., Genon, G., Brizio, E., Russolillo, D.: Production of green energy from co-digestion: perspectives for the Province of Cuneo, energetic balance and environmental sustainability. Clean Technol. Environ. Policy (2013). doi: 10.1007/s10098-012-0568-0 Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Van Den Broek, R., Faaij, A., Van Wick, A.: Biomass combustion for power generation. Biomass Bioenergy 11, 271–281 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jeguirim, M., Chouchene, A., Reguillon, A.F., Trouve, G., Le Buzit, G.: A new valorization strategy of olive oil wastewater: impregnation on sawdust and combustion. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 59, 4–8 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    McIlveen-Wright, D.R., Huang, Y., Rezvani, S., Mondol, J.D., Redpath, D., Anderson, M., Hewitt, N.J., Williams, B.C.: A techno-economic assessment of the reduction of carbon dioxide emissions through the use of biomass co-combustion. Fuel 90, 11–18 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Schlamadinger, B., Spitzer, J., Kohlmaier, G.H., Lüdeke, M.: Carbon balance of bioenergy from logging residues. Biomass Bioenergy 8, 221–234 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    IEA Bioenergy: The Role of Bioenergy in Greenhouse Gas Mitigation, Position paper, IES Bioenergy, New Zealand (1998)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Maniatis K.: Progress in Biomass Gasification: An Overview, (2002) Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Panepinto, D., Genon, G.: Biomass thermal treatment: energy recovery, environmental compatibility and determination of external costs. Waste Biomass Valoriz. 3, 197–206 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Genon, G., Torchio, M.F., Poggio, A., Poggio, M.: Energy and environmental assessment of small district heating systems: global and local effects in two case-studies. Energy Convers. Manag. 50, 522–529 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    European Commission edited by Bickel Peter and Friedrich Rainer: ExternE—Externalities of Energy Methodology 2005 Update, Institut für Energiewirtschaft und Rationelle Energieanwendung—IER Universität Stuttgart, Germany, ISBN 92-79-00423-9 (2005)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    US Environmental Protection Agency: User’s Guide for the Industrial Source Complex (ISC3) dispersion models, vol. I—user instructions. http://www.epa.gov/scram001/userg/regmod/isc3v1.pdf (1995). Accessed 20 April 2013
  23. 23.
    D. Lgs: n. 152 “Regulation in Environmental Field”, published on Gazzetta Ufficiale n. 88, supplemento ordinario n. 96 (in Italian) 3 April (2006)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Fracastoro, G.V., Barbero, A.M., Baccon, F. (Politecnico di Torino): Requisiti tecnici per impianti a cippato superiori a 350 kW. http://www.fire-italia.it/forum/pellet/all_oltre_350.pdf (2004). Accessed 15 July 2009
  25. 25.
    Panepinto, D., Genon, G.: Environmental balance study for the construction of a biomass plant in a small town in Piedmont (Northern Italy). WIT Trans. Ecol. Environ. 143, 279–290 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Deborah Panepinto
    • 1
  • Francesca Viggiano
    • 1
  • Giuseppe Genon
    • 1
  1. 1.DIATIPolitecnico di TorinoTurinItaly

Personalised recommendations