Optical properties of DNA induced starch capped PbS, CdS and PbS/CdS nanocomposites
- 157 Downloads
- 3 Citations
Abstract
Starch capped PbS, CdS and PbS–CdS nanocomposites are conjugated with Calf–Thymus DNA. All the materials are characterized by X-ray diffraction, high-resolution transmission electron microscopy, UV–Vis spectroscopy and photoluminescence spectroscopy. The x-ray diffraction patterns of PbS and CdS show that the materials possess polycrystalline having both cubic and hexagonal phases. High resolution transmission electron microscopic results (HRTEM) shows PbS nanoparticles of size 3 nm and that of CdS nanoparticles having average size 4 nm which exhibit tendency of agglomeration. In case of PbS/CdS, it exhibits different types of nanosheets. The UV absorption spectra of all the samples exhibit clear blue-shift with the respective bulk absorption edges. This is attributed to the strong quantum confinement in the materials. The absorption spectra also exhibit increase of the band gaps from 2.25 to 4.35 eV for PbS; 2.25–4.2 eV for CdS with decrease of molarities from 0.1 to 0.001 M as well as conjugated with DNA. The photoluminescence spectra of all PbS, CdS and PbS/CdS composites synthesized at 0.1 M molar concentration show a further blue shift and an enhancement of intensity after conjugation with DNA, but the effect is reversed i.e. occurrence of red shift and reduction of intensity for those having 0.01 M. This is due to the two competing processes of surface passivation as well as stabilization of nanocomposites governed by bio-molecules and that of Dexter energy transfer with the effective charge separation. The result shows the applicability of the materials in development of biological labels and biosensors.
Keywords
Nanocomposites CBD DNA Starch Agglomeration BiosensorPACS Nos.
78.40.Fy 78.55.Cr 78.55.EtNotes
Acknowledgments
We acknowledge Department of Chemistry, Gauhati University for providing UV–Vis and PL Characterization, CIF and Department of Physics, IIT Guwahati for giving the facilities for HRTEM and XRD measurements. We also acknowledge Department of Bio-Technology, Gauhati University for providing the DNA solution.
References
- [1]X Shen, Z Li, Y Cui and Y Pang Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 6 3525 (2011)Google Scholar
- [2]C Liu, Y Jiang, J Huang and H Duan Int. J. Nanosci. 6 3121 (2012)Google Scholar
- [3]G Mandal and T Ganguly Indian J Phys. 85 1229 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [4]S Bhushan and A Shrivastava Indian J. Phys. 84 1517 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [5]S Jana, R Thapa, R Maity and K K Chattopadhyay Phys. E 40 3121 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [6]D M M Atwa, I M Azzouz and Y Badr Appl. Phys. B 103 161 (2011)Google Scholar
- [7]K J Mispa, P Subramaniam and R Murugeson Chalcogenide Lett. 5 335 (2010)Google Scholar
- [8]C C Uhuegbu Can. J. Sci. Ind. Res. 6 230 (2011)Google Scholar
- [9]X Zhao, I Gorelikov, S Musikhin, S Cauchi and V Sukhovatkin Langmuir 21 1086 (2005)Google Scholar
- [10]J Akhtar, et al. J. Mater. Chem. 20 2336 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [11]L Bakueva, I Gorekilov, S Musikhin, X S Zhao, E H Sergeant and E Kumucheva Adv. Mater. 11 126 (2004)Google Scholar
- [12]N Faleni and M J Moloto IJRRAS 14 127 (2013)Google Scholar
- [13]M Rahnkim, Y M Kanoj and D J Jang J. Phys. Chem. C 111 18507 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [14]J Song, Z Dai, W GUO, Y Li and W Wang Prz. Elektrotech. 1b 89 (2013)Google Scholar
- [15]N Ma, J Yang, K M Stewart and S Kelley Langmuir 23 12783 (2007)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- [16]N M Bakhori, N A Yusof, A H Abdullah and M Z Hussein 2nd ICESB 48 138 (2012)Google Scholar
- [17]A Merkoce Biosens. Bioelectron. 2b 1164 (2010)Google Scholar
- [18]M F Frasco and N Chaniotalis Sensors 9 7266 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [19]S Gulia and R Kakkar Adv. Mater. Lett. 12 876 (2013)Google Scholar
- [20]Y Fu, X Wang, J Zhang and W Li Curr. Opin. Biotech. 28 33 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [21]N Ma, G Tikhomirov and S O Kelley Acc. Chem. Res. 43 173 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [22]N Choudhury and B K Sarma Indian J Pure Appl. Phys. 46 261 (2008)Google Scholar
- [23]Y A Kalandaragh, M B Muradov, R K Mamedov, M Behboudnia and A Khodayari Optoelectron. Adv. Mater. 2 42 (2008)Google Scholar
- [24]A D Mohammed, D C Onwudiwe, D A Young and H C M Vosloo Mater. Lett. 114 63 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [25]M A Mohammed, A M Mousa and J P Ponpon J. Semicond. Tech. Sci. 9 117 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [26]M A Barote, S S Kamble, A A Yadav, R V Suryavanshi, L P Deshmukh and E U Masumdar Mater. Lett. 78 113 (2012)Google Scholar
- [27]H C Warad, S C Ghosh, B Henstanson, C Thanachayanont and J Dutta Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater. 6 296 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [28]R R Thankaleshmi, S Dixit and A C Rastogi Adv. Mater. Lett. 4 9 (2013)Google Scholar
- [29]S Y Jang, Y M Song, H S Kim, Y J Cho and Y S Seo ACS Nano 4 2391 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [30]G H Yue, P X Yan, J Z Liu, D M Qu, Q Yang and X Y Fan J. Cryst. Growth 293 428 (2006)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [31]Y Wang, Q Guo, S Lin, B Chen and D Zheng J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 152 012018 (2009)Google Scholar
- [32]D Kumar, G Agarwal, B Tripathi, D Vyas and V Kulshrestha J Alloy. Compd. 484 463 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [33]B Zhang, G Li, J Zhang, Y Zhang and L Zhang Nanotechnology 14 443 (2003)Google Scholar
- [34]A A Lutich, G Jiang, A S Susha, A L Rogach, F D Stefani and J Feldmann Nano Lett. 9 2636 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [35]C H Vannoy, A J Tavares, M O Noor, U Uddayasankar and U J Krull Sensors 11 9732 (2011)Google Scholar