Variation of atmospheric electrical conductivity during monsoon period at a semi-urban tropical station of Northern India
- 98 Downloads
- 4 Citations
Abstarct
This paper presents an analysis of atmospheric electrical conductivity during monsoon period at a semi-urban site of Northern India. Continuous measurements of unipolar positive conductivity along with some meteorological parameters were made from June to August 2010 at Roorkee (29°52′N, 77°53′E, 275 m above sea level). The electrical conductivity for the three consecutive months was in the range of (25.2–19.5), (65–18) and (53–26) × 10−16 S/m respectively. The atmospheric electrical conductivity was positively correlated with wind speed, relative humidity and rain fall while it was found to be negatively correlated with average temperature in the monsoon period. Possible causes for the variation of atmospheric electrical conductivity in the light of meteorological parameters were discussed.
Keywords
Conductivity RH Rainfall MonsoonPACS Nos.
92.60.Pw 92.70.Bc 92.70.QrNotes
Acknowledgments
The corresponding author (AK) is thankful to Prof J Rai, Indian Institute of Technology, Roorkee, India for providing the necessary experimental facilities and fruitful discussion in completing the present work. Author is grateful to Prof A L Verma, Amity Institute of Applied Sciences, Amity University, Noida, India for providing the necessary computational facilities.
References
- [1]C G Deshpande and A K Kamra Atmos. Res. 65 51 (2002)Google Scholar
- [2]P S Praveen et al. Atmos. Environ. 41 825 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [3]B Tyagi and A N V Satyanarayana J. Atmos. Terrs. Phys. 72 224 (2010)Google Scholar
- [4]D Retalis, A Pitta and P Psallidas Meteorol. Atmos. Phys. 46 197 (1991)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [5]A M Selvam, R Vijay Kumar and A S R Murthy Theor. Appl Cimat. 48 15 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [6]C G Deshpande and A K Kamra Atmos. Res. 70 77 (2004)Google Scholar
- [7]K Nagaraja, B S N Prasad and J Datta Advan. in Space Res. 44 1067 (2009)Google Scholar
- [8]W A Hoppel and G M Frick Aeros. Sci. Tech. 5 1 (2007)Google Scholar
- [9]H Tammet et al. Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss. 6 3135 (2006)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [10]S S Dhanorkar, C G Deshpande and A K Kamra Atmos. Environ. 23 839 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [11]G K Manohar, S S Kandalgaonkar and M K Kulkarni J. Geophys. Res. 100 20805 (1995)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [12]J S Pillai, S Saxena and K G Vernekar Bound. Layer Meteorol. 89 197 (1998)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [13]T Madhavi Latha, P Peddi Naidu, D N Madhusudhana Rao and M Indira Devi Indian J. Phys. 86 947 (2012)Google Scholar
- [14]P K Jana and I Saha Indian J. Phys. 85 667 (2011)Google Scholar
- [15]A J Bennett and R G Harrison J. Atmos. Terrs. Phys. 70 373 (2008)Google Scholar
- [16]R G Harrison and Ilya Usoskin J. Atmos. Terrs. Phys. 72 176 (2010)Google Scholar
- [17]D Saxena, R Yadav and A Kumar Indian J. Phys. 84 383 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [18]V N R Mukku Ph D thesis University of Roorkee, India (1982)Google Scholar
- [19]D Beysens et al. Atmos. Environ. 40 3710 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [20]E F Nymphas et al. J. Atmos. Terrs. Phys. 80 28 (2012)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [21]N Yackerson Sci. Total Envir. 293 107 (2002)Google Scholar
- [22]D Singh et al. Atmos. Res. 84 91 (2007)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [23]D Siingh, D Chate and K Ali Kamra Int. J. Remote Sensing 33 962 (2012)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [24]S K Midya, D Ghosh, S C Ganda and H Sarkar Indian J. Phys. 85 1247 (2011)Google Scholar
- [25]V Pant, D Siingh and A K Kamra Atmos. Environ. 45 5138 (2011)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar