Advertisement

MAPAN

pp 1–9 | Cite as

Proficiency Investigation of Torque Tools Calibration as a National Demand

  • K. M. KhaledEmail author
  • Seif M. Osman
Original Paper
  • 17 Downloads

Abstract

The current paper represents a round loop for calibration of torque tools organized by NIS. These measurements are aimed to evaluate the performance of torque tools calibration laboratories in Egypt in the range from 200 N m up to 1000 N m in both clockwise and anticlockwise directions. Results are evaluated using En-value method and Z-score method based on the weighted means and the corresponding uncertainties. The outlier test and consistency test were performed on the measurements before applying the Z-score test. The Z-score evaluation shows that participants’ results are consistent specifically in the range from 400 N m up to 1000 N m. Further comparison with lower capacity artifact is recommended in the lower torque range.

Keywords

Torque Calibration Proficiency test En-value Z-score 

References

  1. [1]
    CIPM MRA-D-05, Measurement comparisons in the CIPM MRA, Version 1.6, March 2016, WWW.BIPM.org
  2. [2]
    ISO/IEC 17025 – 2017, General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratoriesGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    ISO/IEC 17011 – 2017, Conformity assessment – Requirements for accreditation bodies accrediting conformity assessment bodiesGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
  5. [5]
    ISO6789-2:2017, Assembly Tools for Screws and Nuts – Hand Torque Tools – Part 2: Requirements for Calibration and Determination of Measurement UncertaintyGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    K.M. Khaled and Seif M. Osman, Improving the new ISO 6789:2017 for setting torque tools – Proposal, Measurement 112 (2017) 150–156.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    ISO/IEC 17043 – 2010, Conformity assessment—General requirements for proficiency testingGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
  9. [9]
    Takuri Tojo, Katsuhisa Katase, Koji Ohgushi and Shigemitsu Kuwayama, Comparative calibration of force calibration machines used by JCSS-Accredited Calibration Laboratories, Proceeding of IMEKO-1999.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    ISO 13528-2015, Statistical methods for use in proficiency testing by interlaboratory comparisonGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    M. G. Cox, The Evaluation of key comparison data, Metrologia, 39 (2002) 589–595ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Metrology Society of India 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.National Institute of Standards (NIS)GizaEgypt

Personalised recommendations