Advertisement

MAPAN

pp 1–7 | Cite as

Artificial Neural Network Technique for Statistical Downscaling of Global Climate Model

  • Rajashekhar S. LaddimathEmail author
  • Nagraj S. Patil
Review Paper
  • 39 Downloads

Abstract

The nineteenth century, an era of industrialization, witnessed huge utilization of natural resources extensively for the construction activities besides emission of nitrous oxide and methane (green house gases). Rises in the GHG play an important role in the impact on climate change. Rapid and dynamic changes of earth climate have affected human life physically, psychologically, and emotionally. General circulation models (GCMs) are the numerical models developed using a set of linear and nonlinear partial differential equations. Climate and weather forecasting reliability can be possible with the use of GCMs. Statistical downscaling is popular among the research community on an account of building a strong and accurate relationship between GCM and local level information. Among the wide range of regression models, artificial neural network (ANN), a multilinear regression method, is the most popular approach, which works on the basis of transfer function statistically relating predictors and predictands. ANN is developed particularly to address present requirements in global environmental change research and necessitate for more detailed temporal and spatial information from GCM. For the present work, CanCM4 at grid size 2.8° × 2.8° developed by Canadian Centre for Climate Modelling and Analysis has been chosen based on the skill score. It gives historical data from 1971 to 2005 as well as the data consisted of future simulations by emission scenarios RCP4.5 from 2006 to 2035. The data were extracted to cover the entire Bhima basin with nine grid points. Observed meteorological data provided by Indian Meteorological Department (IMD) are used for calibration and validation of ANN model. Karl Pearson’s coefficient is taken as guideline to test the sensitiveness of predictors. To evaluate the performance of downscaling model, Nash–Sutcliffe coefficient and root-mean-square error performance indices have been adopted. With the good predictor and predictand correlation, the work moves on to investigate the application of the transfer function in the form of statistical downscaling. The downscaled results can be applied to watershed management such as flood and drought management studies of the Bhima basin.

Keywords

Climate change Statistical downscaling GCMs ANN Predictors and predictands 

Supplementary material

12647_2018_299_MOESM1_ESM.txt (0 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (TXT 1 kb)

References

  1. [1]
    F.H.S. Chiew, W.J. Young, W. Cai and J. Teng, Current drought and future hydro climate projections in southeast Australia and implications for water resources management, Stoch. Env. Res. Risk Assess., 25 (2010) 601–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    A. Anandhi, V.V. Srinivas, S. Nanjundiah and D.N. Kumar, Downscaling precipitation to river basin in India for IPCC SRES scenarios using support vector machine, Int. J. Climatol., 420 (2008) 401–420.  https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.1529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    R.L. Wilby, J. Troni, Y. Biot, L. Tedd, B.C. Hewitson, D.M. Smith and R.T. Sutton, A review of climate risk information for adaptation and development planning, Int. J. Climatol., 29(9) (2009) 1193–1215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    M.Z. Hashmi, A.Y. Shamseldin, B.W. Melville, Statistical downscaling of precipitation: state-of-the-art and application of bayesian multi-model approach for uncertainty assessment, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 6 (2009) 6535–6579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    N.S. Patil, R.S. Laddimath, Pooja, S. Hooli, Downscaling of precipitation data from GCM outputs using artificial neural network for Bhima basin, Int. J. Appl. Environ. Sci., 10 (2015) 1493–1508.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    IPCC, Climate Change 2001: the scientific basis contributions of Working Group I to the third assessment report of the International Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2001).Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    R.L. Wilby and T.M.L. Wigley, Downscaling general circulation model output: a review of methods and limitations, Progr. Phys. Geogr., 21 (1997) 530–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    M. Lenart,. Downscaling techniques, The University of Arizona, Tucson (2008).Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    R.L. Wilby, M.L. Wigley, D. Conway, P.D. Jones, B.C. Hewitson, J. Main and D.S. Wilks, Statistical downscaling of general circulation model output: a comparison of methods, Water Resour. Res., 34 (1998) 2995–3008.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    E.P. Salathé, Jr., P.W. Mote and M.W. Wiley, Review of scenario selection and downscaling methods for the assessment of climate change impacts on hydrology in the United States Pacific Northwest, Int. J. Climatol., 27 (2007) 1611–1621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    H.J. Fowler, S. Blenkinsop and C. Tebaldi, Linking climate change modelling to impacts studies: recent advances in downscaling techniques for hydrological modelling, Int. J. Climatol., 27 (2007) 1547–1578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    H.J. Fowler, S. Blenkinsop and C. Tebaldi, Beyond the downscaling comparison study, J. Clim., 27 (2007) 1543–1545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    F.A.M. Nazri, J.S. Mandeep and H. Husain, Statistical modelling of 1-min rain rate derived from 1-h integration time in Malaysia, MAPAN-J. Metrol. Soc. India, 33 (2018) 179–184.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12647-017-0249-x.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    R.W. Katz and M.B. Parlange, Over dispersion in stochastic modeling of precipitation, J. Clim., 11 (1998) 591–601.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    J.M. Murphy, An evaluation of statistical and dynamical techniques for downscaling local climate, J. Clim., 12 (1999) 2256–2284.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    J.W. Kidson, An analysis of New Zealand synoptic types and their use in defining weather regimes, Int. J. Climatol., 20 (2000) 299–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    H. Tatli, H.N. Dalfes and S. Mentes, A statistical downscaling method for monthly total precipitation over Turkey, Int. J. Climatol., 24 (2004) 161–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    R. Chadwick, E. Coppola and F. Giorgi, An artificial neural network technique for downscaling GCM outputs to RCM spatial scale, Nonlinear Processes in Geophys., 18(6) (2011) 1013–1028.  https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-18-1013-2011.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    W.S. McCulloch, W. Pitts, A logical calculus of the ideas immanent in nervous activity. The Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics 5(4) (1943) 115–133.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    C.W. Dawsonz and R. Wilby, An artificial neural network approach to rainfall-runoff modelling, Hydrol. Sci. J., 43(1) (1998) 47–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    C. Bishop, Neural networks for pattern recognition, Clarendon Press, Oxford (2000).zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    H.R. Maier and G.C. Dandy, Neural networks for the prediction and forecasting of water resources variables: a review of modeling issues and applications, Environ. Model. Softw., 15 (2010) 101–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    R.J. Abrahart, F. Anctil, P. Coulibaly, C.W. Dawson, N.J. Mount, L.M. See, A.Y. Shamseldin, D.P. Solomatine, E. Toth and R.L. Wilby, Two decades of anarchy? Emerging themes and outstanding challenges for neural network river forecasting, Prog. Phys. Geogr., 36(4) (2012) 480–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. [24]
    Maharashtra Water And Irrigation Commission Report, Government Of Maharashtra, Volume II (1999).Google Scholar
  25. [25]
    B.C. Hewitson and R.G. Crane, Climate downscaling: techniques and application, Clim. Res., 7 (1996) 85–95.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. [26]
    K. Pearson, Mathematical contributions to the theory of evolution III regression heredity and panmixia. Philos. Trans. R Soc. Lond. Ser., 187 (1896) 253–318.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. [27]
    R.L. Wilby, S.P. Charles, E. Zorita, B. Timbal, P. Whetton and L.O. Mearns, Guidelines for use of climate scenarios developed from statistical downscaling methods (2004). http://www.ipcc-data.org/guidelines/dgm_no2_v1_09_2004.pdf.
  28. [28]
    J.E. Nash and J.V. Sutcliffe, River flow forecasting through conceptual models, part I—a discussion of principles, J. Hydrol., 10 (1970) 282–290.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. [29]
    B.B. Alkan, C. Atakan, Y. Akdi, Visual analysis using biplot techniques of rainfall changes over Turkey, MAPAN-J. Metrol. Soc India, 30 (2015) 25–30.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12647-014-0119-8.Google Scholar
  30. [30]
    S. Ghosh and P.P. Mujumdar, Statistical downscaling of GCM simulations to stream flow by means of relevance vector machine, Adv. Water Resour., 31 (2008) 132–146.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. [31]
    D.N. Moriasi, J.G. Arnold, M.W. Van Liew, R.L. Bingner, R.D. Harmel and T.L. Veith, Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations, Trans. ASABE, 50 (2007) 885–890.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Metrology Society of India 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Civil EngineeringREVA UniversityBengaluruIndia
  2. 2.Center for P.G. Studies/VTU-Regional Research CenterVisvesvarayya Technological UniversityBelagaviIndia

Personalised recommendations