Psychological Studies

, Volume 64, Issue 4, pp 465–473 | Cite as

Psychological Capital Augments Employee Engagement

  • Kumari SoniEmail author
  • Renu Rastogi


The purpose of this paper is to examine the importance of psychological capital as a significant predictor of employees’ engagement and also how these positive psychological capabilities motivate employees to perform beyond their job description. In today’s competitive environment, it is a challenging task for all organizations to enhance the levels of work engagement among employees. To address this challenge, the present study focuses on how core dimensions of psychological capital are related to employee engagement, as it contributes positively to different workplace outcomes and performance level of employees. The study has been conducted using a sample of 200 IT professionals. Data analyses were performed using correlation analysis and structural equation modeling. The result of path coefficient (β = .70, p < .001) suggested that high (low) psychological capital was associated with high (low) employee engagement. A positive and significant correlation was reported between psychological capital and employee engagement. The findings suggested psychological capital work as a significant predictor, along with the other variables in fostering employee engagement.


Psychological capital Employee engagement Positive psychology 



  1. Adler, P. S., & Seok-Woo, K. (2002). Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Academy of Management Review,27(1), 17–40.Google Scholar
  2. Antonovsky, A. (1979). Health, stress, and coping (1st ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  3. Arakawa, D., & Greenberg, M. (2007). Optimistic managers and their influence on productivity and employee engagement in a technology organization: Implications for coaching psychologists. International Coaching Psychology Review,2(1), 78–89.Google Scholar
  4. Avey, J. B., Hughes, L. W., Norman, S. M., & Luthans, K. (2008). Using positivity, transformational leadership and empowerment to combat employee negativity. Leadership and Organization Development Journal,29(2), 110–126.Google Scholar
  5. Avey, J. B., Luthans, F., & Jensen, S. M. (2009). Psychological capital: A positive resource for combating employee stress and turnover. Human Resource Management,48(5), 677–693.Google Scholar
  6. Avey, J. B., Luthans, F., & Youssef, C. M. (2010). The additive value of positive psychological capital in predicting work attitudes and behaviors. Journal of Management,36(2), 430–452.Google Scholar
  7. Avey, J. B., Wernsing, T. S., & Luthans, F. (2008). Can positive employees help positive organizational change? Impact of psychological capital and emotions on relevant attitudes and behaviors. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science,44(1), 48–70.Google Scholar
  8. Avolio, B. J. (2005). The chief integrative leader: Moving to the next economy’s HR leader. In M. Losey, S. Meisenger, & D. Ulrich (Eds.), The future of human resource management: 63 thought leaders explore the critical HR issues of today and tomorrow (pp. 95–102). Washington, DC: Society of Human Resource Management.Google Scholar
  9. Avolio, B. J., Gardner, W. L., Walumbwa, F. O., Luthans, F., & May, D. R. (2004). Unlocking the mask: A look at the process by which authentic leaders impact follower attitudes and behaviors. Leadership Quarterly,15(3), 801–823.Google Scholar
  10. Avolio, B. J., & Luthans, F. (2006). The high impact leader: Moments matter in accelerating authentic leadership development. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  11. Bakker, A. B., Gierveld, J. H., & Van Rijswijk, K. (2006). Success factors among female school principals in primary teaching: A study on burnout, work engagement, and performance. Diemen, The Netherlands: Right Management Consultants.Google Scholar
  12. Bakker, A. B., Schaufeli, W. B., Leiter, M. P., & Taris, T. W. (2008). Work engagement: An emerging concept in occupational health psychology. Work Stress, 22(3), 187–200.Google Scholar
  13. Bandura, A. (2000). Exercise of human agency through collective efficacy. Current Directions in Psychological Science,9(3), 75–78.Google Scholar
  14. Bandura, A., & Locke, E. (2003). Negative self-efficacy and goal effects revisited. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(1), 87–99.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Bauer, T. N., Bodner, T., Erdogan, B., Truxillo, D. M., & Tucker, J. S. (2007). Newcomer adjustment during organizational socialization: A meta-analytic review of antecedents, outcomes, and methods. Journal of Applied Psychology,92(3), 707–721.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Baumgardner, S. R., & Crothers, M. K. (2010). Positive psychology. Hoboken, NJ: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
  17. Cameron, K., Mora, C., Leutscher, T., & Calarco, M. (2011). Effects of positive practices on organizational effectiveness. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science,47(3), 266–308.Google Scholar
  18. Cetin, F. (2011). The effects of the organizational psychological capital on the attitude of commitment and satisfaction: A public sample in Turkey. European Journal of Social Science, 21(3), 373–380.Google Scholar
  19. Cozzarelli, C. (1993). Personality and self-efficacy as predictors of coping with abortion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,65(6), 1224–1237.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Endres, G. M., & Mancheno-Smoak, L. (2008). The human resource craze: Human performance improvement and employee engagement. Organizational Development Journal,26(1), 69–78.Google Scholar
  21. Hobfoll, S. (2002). Social and psychological resources and adaptation. Review of General Psychology,6(4), 307–324.Google Scholar
  22. Hodges, T. D. (2010). An experimental study of the impact of psychological capital on performance, engagement, and the contagion effect. Dissertations and Thesis from the College of Business Administration, University of Nebraska.Google Scholar
  23. Hoyle, R. H. (1995). The structural equation modeling approach: Basic concepts and fundamental issues. Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 1–15). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  24. Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1996). LISREL 8: User’s reference guide. Chicago: Scientific Software International.Google Scholar
  25. Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal,33(4), 692–724.Google Scholar
  26. Kobasa, S. (1979). Stressful life events, personality, and health: An inquiry into hardiness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,37(1), 1–11.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Larson, M. D., Norman, S. M., Hughes, L. W., & Avey, J. B. (2013). Psychological capital: A new lens for understanding employee fit and attitudes. International Journal of Leadership Studies,8(1), 28–43.Google Scholar
  28. Little, B., & Little, P. (2006). Employee engagement: Conceptual issues. Journal of Organizational Culture, Communications, and Conflict,10(1), 111–120.Google Scholar
  29. Luthans, F., Avey, J. B., Avolio, B. J., Norman, S. M., & Combs, G. M. (2006). Psychological capital development: Toward a micro-intervention. Journal of Organizational Behaviour,27(3), 387–393.Google Scholar
  30. Luthans, F., & Avolio, B. (2003). Authentic leadership: A positive development approach. In K. S. Cameron, J. E. Dutton, & R. E. Quinn (Eds.), Positive organizational scholarship (pp. 241–258). San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.Google Scholar
  31. Luthans, F., Avolio, B. J., Avey, J. B., & Norman, S. M. (2007). Positive psychological capital: Measurement and relationship with performance and satisfaction. Personnel Psychology,60(3), 541–572.Google Scholar
  32. Luthans, F., Avolio, B. J., Walumbwa, F. O., & Li, W. (2005). The psychological capital of Chinese workers: Exploring the relationship with performance. Management and Organization Review,1(2), 249–271.Google Scholar
  33. Luthans, F., Luthans, K. W., & Luthans, B. C. (2004). Positive psychological capital: Going beyond the human and social capital. Business Horizons,47(1), 45–50.Google Scholar
  34. Luthans, F., Norman, S. M., Avolio, B. J., & Avey, J. B. (2008). The mediating role of psychological capital in the supportive organizational climate-employee performance relationship. Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 29(2), 219–238.Google Scholar
  35. Luthans, F., & Youssef, C. M. (2007). Emerging positive organizational behavior. Journal of Management,33(3), 321–349.Google Scholar
  36. Luthans, F., Youssef, C. M., & Avolio, B. J. (2007). Psychological capital: Developing the human competitive edge. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Macey, W. H., & Schneider, B. (2008). The meaning of employee engagement. Industrial and Organizational Psychology,1(1), 3–30.Google Scholar
  38. Macey, W. H., Schneider, B., Barbera, K. M., & Young, S. A. (2009). Employee engagement: Tools for analysis, practice and competitive advantage. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  39. Othman, N., & Nasurdin, A. M. (2011). Work engagement of malaysian nurses: Exploring the impact of hope and resilience. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology,5(12), 391–395.Google Scholar
  40. Peterson, C. (2000). The future of optimism. American Psychologist,55(1), 44–55.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Peterson, S. J., Walumbwa, F. O., Byron, K., & Myrowitz, J. (2009). CEO positive psychological traits, transformational leadership, and firm performance in high-technology start-up and established firms. Journal of Management,35(2), 348–368.Google Scholar
  42. Rini, C. K., Dunkel-Schetter, C., Wadhwa, P. D., & Sandman, C. A. (1999). Psychological adaptation and birth outcomes: The role of personal resources, stress, and sociocultural context in pregnancy. Health Psychology,18(4), 333–345.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Rothmann, S., & Essenko, N. (2007). Job characteristics, optimism, burnout, and ill health of support staff in a higher education institution in South Africa. South African Journal of Psychology,37(1), 135–152.Google Scholar
  44. Rurkkhum, S., & Barlett, K. R. (2012). The relationship between employees engagement and organizational citizenship behavior in Thailand. Human Resource Development International,15(2), 157–174.Google Scholar
  45. Schaufeli, W. B., & Bakker, A. B. (2004). Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement. Journal of Organizational Behavior,25(1), 293–315.Google Scholar
  46. Schaufeli, W. B., Bakker, A. B., & Salanova, M. (2006). The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire: A cross-national study. Educational and Psychological Measurement,66(4), 701–716.Google Scholar
  47. Schaufeli, W. B., Taris, T. W., Le Blanc, P., Peeters, M., Bakker, A. B., & De Jonge, J. (2001). Does work make happy? In search of the engaged worker. De Psycholoog,36(9), 422–428.Google Scholar
  48. Simons, J. C., & Buitendach, J. H. (2013). Psychological capital, work engagement and organizational commitment amongst call center employees in South Africa. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology,39(2), 1–12.Google Scholar
  49. Snyder, C. R. (2002). Hope theory: Rainbows in the mind. Psychological Inquiry,13(4), 249–276.Google Scholar
  50. Snyder, C. R., Irving, L., & Anderson, J. R. (1991). Hope and health: Measuring the will and the ways. In C. R. Snyder & D. R. Forsyth (Eds.), Handbook of social and clinical psychology: The health perspective (pp. 285–307). Elmsford, NY: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  51. Sonnentag, S. (2011). Research on work engagement is well and alive. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology,20(1), 29–38.Google Scholar
  52. Thoits, P. (1994). Stressors and problem solving: The individual as a psychological activist. Journal of Health and Social Behavior,35(2), 143–160.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Wijhe, C., Peeters, M., Schaufeli, W., & Hout, M. (2011). Understanding workaholism and work engagement: The role of mood and stop rules. Career Development International, 16(3), 254–170.Google Scholar
  54. Xanthopoulou, D., Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2007). The role of personal resources in the job demands-resources model. International Journal of Stress Management,14(2), 121–141.Google Scholar
  55. Xanthopoulou, D., Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2009). Reciprocal relationships between job resources, personal resources, and work engagement. Journal of Vocational Behavior,74(3), 235–244.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© National Academy of Psychology (NAOP) India 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Humanities and Social SciencesIndian Institute of Technology RoorkeeRoorkeeIndia

Personalised recommendations