Advertisement

Marriage Counsellors’ Reflections on the Counselling Process in Family Courts in India

  • Chetna Duggal
  • Sujata Sriram
  • Kriti Jain
Research in Progress
  • 1 Downloads

Abstract

Family courts in India were established to facilitate speedy redressal of family disputes, particularly matrimonial issues. Marriage counsellors facilitated dispute resolution based on alternative dispute resolution practices. Counselling was mandated for all couples approaching family courts due to marital discord. At present, there is a lack of literature on the process of counselling followed by marriage counsellors in the family courts. The present study used an exploratory research design to understand marriage counsellors’ perspectives on the process of counselling in family courts. Fifty-six marriage counsellors completed open-ended questionnaires on counselling assessment, goals, interventions and the influence of the presence of children on the couple counselling process. Thematic text analysis of the responses revealed a range of areas that counsellors explored, individual and relational goals that they focused on, as well as the interventions used by marriage counsellors in their work with couples. Findings suggested that there was a lack of uniformity in the counselling approaches used by marriage counsellors. Additionally, marriage counsellors reported not being equipped to address some intrapersonal and interpersonal concerns that emerged in the counselling process, despite identifying them. Based on the findings, the paper recommends the need for a unifying framework for training and practice for marriage counsellors working with couples in family courts to conceptualise couples’ concerns as well as guide their goals and interventions. The paper underscores the need for acknowledging sociocultural influences, reflective practice and client feedback in the process of counselling.

Keywords

Family courts Marital counselling Couple counselling Counselling process 

References

  1. Anker, M. G., Duncan, B. L., & Sparks, J. A. (2009). Using client feedback to improve couple therapy outcomes: A randomized clinical trial in a naturalistic setting. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 77(4), 693–704.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Basu, J. (2006). Playing off courts: Negotiation of divorce and violence in plural legal settings in Kolkata. The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law, 38(52), 41–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Basu, J. (2012). Judges of normality: Mediating marriage in the family courts of Kolkata, India. Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 37(2), 469–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Christensen, A. (2010). A unified protocol for couple therapy. In K. Hahlweg, M. Grawe-Gerber, & D. H. Baucom (Eds.), Enhancing couples: The shape of couple therapy to come (pp. 33–46). Cambridge, MA: Hogrefe Publishing.Google Scholar
  5. Chromy, S. (2006). A solution-based approach to couple therapy: A case example. Journal of Couple and Relationship Therapy, 6(4), 71–84.  https://doi.org/10.1300/J398v06n04_04.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dommaraju, P. (2016). Divorce and separation in India. Population and Development Review, 42(2), 195–223.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2016.00127.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Harman, J. (2011). Confidentiality in family dispute resolution and family counselling: Recent cases and why they matter. Journal of Family Studies, 17(3), 204–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. James, L. (1999). Family counselling in family court: An analysis of the psycho-social dynamics of the families with special reference to family court, Thrissur. Discussion Paper No. 13, Trivandrum: Kerala Research Project for Local Level Development. Google Scholar
  9. Johnson, S., & Lebow, J. (2000). The “Coming of Age” of couple therapy: A decade review. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 26(1), 23–38.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Karver, M. S., Handelsman, J. B., Fields, S., & Bickman, L. (2006). Meta-analysis of therapeutic relationship ariables in youth and family therapy: The evidence for different relationship variables in the child and adolescent treatment outcome literature. Clinical Psychology Review, 26(1), 50–65.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Kuo, F.-C. (2009). Secrets or no secrets: Confidentiality in couple therapy. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 37(5), 351–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Maitra, S., & Gayathri, K. R. (2015). Divorce trends and its implications for children’s well-being: A study of family court in Mumbai. Retrieved from http://www.bcpt.org.in/articles/Divorce_trends_and_its_implications_on_childrens_well_being.pdf. Accessed 2 Feb 2017.
  13. Malhotra, A., & Malhotra, R. (2013). Alternative dispute resolution in Indian family law—Realities, practicalities and necessities. National Commission for Women, Family Courts: Report on working of family courts and model family courts, New Delhi. Retrieved from https://www.iafl.com/cms.../alternative_dispute_resolution_in_indian_family_law.pdf.
  14. Mathew, E. (2011). Viewpoint: Concerns about the limits of confidentiality in FDR. Journal of Family Studies, 17(3), 213–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Panchu, S. (2003). On the mediation process. Paper for the conference sponsored by the Law Commission of India on ADR/Mediation. Retrieved from http://lawcommissionofindia.nic.in/adr_conf/sriram17.pdf. Accessed 2 Feb 2017.
  16. Popping, R. (2015). Analysing open ended questions by means of text analysis procedures. Bulletin de méthodologie sociologique: BMS, 128(1), 23–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ramachandrappa, S. (2012). Causes and consequences of divorce in Bangalore city—A sociological approach. Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 4(4), 6–9.Google Scholar
  18. Silverstein, R., Bass, L. B., Tuttle, A., Knudson-Martin, C., & Huenergardt, D. (2006). What does it mean to be relational? A framework for assessment and practice. Family Processes, 45(4), 391–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Singh, A., & Sinha, R. K. (2005). Growing incidence of divorce in Indian cities: A study of Mumbai. Paper presented at the XXV IUSSP International Population Conference, Tours, France.Google Scholar
  20. Snyder, D. K., Castellani, A. M., & Whisman, M. A. (2006). Current status and future directions in couple therapy. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 317–344.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070154.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Snyder, D. K., Heyman, R. E., & Haynes, S. N. (2005). Evidence based approaches to assessing couple distress. Psychological Assessment, 17(3), 288–307.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Solanki, G. (2011). Adjudication in religious family laws: Cultural accommodation, legal pluralism, and gender equality in India. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Sriram, S., & Duggal, C. (2016). The Family Courts Act in India: Perspectives from marriage counsellors. Indian Journal of Socio Legal Studies, 4(1), 97–103.Google Scholar
  24. Sullivan, C., & Cottone, R. R. (2006). Culturally based couple therapy and intercultural relationships: A review of the literature. The Family Journal, 14(3), 221–225.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1066480706287278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. The Gazette of India. The Family Courts Act. (1984). Retrieved from http://doj.gov.in/sites/default/files/family-courtsact.pdf. Accessed 2 Feb 2017.
  26. Vatuk, S. (2013). The “women’s court” in India: An alternative dispute resolution body for women in distress. The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law, 45(1), 76–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© National Academy of Psychology (NAOP) India 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Human EcologyTata Institute of Social SciencesMumbaiIndia

Personalised recommendations