Abstract
Cognitive theory and naturalistic decision-making models were utilized to examine the relationship between thoughts, behaviours, and emotions in daily decision-making. An experimental survey using vignettes examined the effects of investment of cognitive and behavioural effort in hypothetical vignettes on emotional responses to uncertain negative outcomes. For each vignette, this negative outcome was either surprising or distressing. Further, the type of uncertainty was an alteration, inclusion, or cancellation pertaining to the original vignette, yielding six conditions in the within-groups design. Participants (N = 335, 220 females) responded to each vignette by choosing a behavioural effort option (low or high), following which they elaborated the reason for their choice (high or low cognitive effort). They also responded to the predetermined negative outcome on an affective scale (emotional response). Results showed that (a) emotional responses to vignettes varied, based on the type of uncertainty in the scenario; (b) surprising outcomes elicited higher emotional distress; (c) behavioural effort positively predicted emotional distress when the type of uncertainty was alteration or inclusion; and (d) strategies involving high cognitive effort predicted investment of high behavioural effort in the vignette. Implications of examining behavioural, cognitive, and emotional processes leading to daily decisions are discussed in the context of coping with uncertainty.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abbott, J. (2005). Understanding and managing the unknown: The nature of uncertainty in planning. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 24(3), 237–251. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X04267710.
Berkowitz, L. (1993). Towards a general theory of anger and emotional aggression: Implications of the cognitive-neoassociationistic perspective for the analysis of anger and other emotions. In R. S. Wyer & T. K. Srull (Eds.), Perspectives on anger and emotion: Advances in social cognition (pp. 1–46). Hillsdale, NJ, England: Erlbaum. Retrieved from http://psycnet.apa.org/psycinfo/1993-98244-001.
Bettman, J. R., Johnson, E. J., & Payne, J. W. (1990). A componential analysis of cognitive effort in choice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 45(1), 111–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(90)90007-V.
Bradley, R., & Drechsler, M. (2014). Types of uncertainty. Erkenntnis, 79(6), 1225–1248. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/24013291.
Dong, X., & Hayes, C. C. (2012). Uncertainty visualizations: Helping decision makers become more aware of uncertainty and its implications. Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making, 6(1), 30–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/1555343411432338.
Fong, C. P. S., & Wyer, R. S. (2003). Cultural, social, and emotional determinants of decisions under uncertainty. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 90(2), 304–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-5978(02)00528-9.
Franken, I. H. A., & Muris, P. (2005). Individual differences in decision making. Personality and Individual Differences, 39(5), 991–998. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2005.04.004.
Franken, I. H. A., van Strien, J. W., Nijs, I., & Muris, P. (2008). Impulsivity is associated with behavioural decision-making deficits. Psychiatry Research, 158(2), 155–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2007.06.002.
Garbarino, E. C., & Edell, J. A. (1997). Cognitive effort, affect, and choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 24(2), 147–158. https://doi.org/10.1086/209500.
Harmon-Jones, E. (2012). Cognitive dissonance theory. In D. M. Buss, R. B. Buxton, N. Christenfeld, O. Devinsky, & A. M. Galurburda (Eds.), Encyclopedia of human behavior (2nd ed., pp. 543–549). Amsterdam: Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-375000-6.00097-5.
Hilborn, R. (1987). Living with uncertainty in resource management. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 7(1), 37–41. https://doi.org/10.1577/1548-8659(1987)7<1.
Hund, E., Massart, D. L., & Smeyers-Verbeke, J. (2001). Operational definitions of uncertainty. Trends in Analytical Chemistry, 20(8), 394–406. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-9936(01)00089-9.
Kangas, J., Store, R., Leskinen, P., & Mehta, L. (2000). Improving the quality of landscape ecological forest planning by utilising advanced decision-support tools. Forest Ecology and Management, 132(2), 157–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(99)00221-2.
Klein, G. A. (1984). A recognition-primed decision (RPD) model of rapid decision making. In G. A. Klein, J. Orasanu, R. Calderwood, & C. E. Zsambok (Eds.), Decision making in action: Models and methods (pp. 138–147). Norwood, CT: Ablex Publishing Corporation. Retrieved from www.books.google.co.in.
Lipshitz, R., & Strauss, O. (1997). Coping with uncertainty: A naturalistic decision making analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 69(2), 149–163. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1997.2679.
Loomes, G., & Sudgen, R. (1986). Disappointment and dynamic consistency in choice under uncertainty. Review of Economic Studies, 53(2), 271–282. https://doi.org/10.2307/2297651.
Mellers, A., Schwartz, A., Ho, K., & Rittov, I. (1997). Decision affect theory: Emotional reactions to the outcomes of risky options. Psychological Science, 8(6), 423–429. https://doi.org/10.1080/026999300402781.
Mellers, B., Schwartz, A., & Ritov, I. (1999). Emotion-based choice. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128(3), 332–345. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.128.3.332.
Montague, P. R., Berns, G. S., & Drive, P. (2002). Neural economics and the biological substrates of valuation. Neuron, 36(2), 265–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0896-6273(02)00974-1.
Noordewier, M. K., & Breugelmans, S. M. (2013). On the valence of surprise. Cognition and Emotion, 27(7), 1326–1334. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2013.777660.
Orasanu, J., & Connolly, T. (1993). The reinvention of decision making. In G. A. Klein, J. Orasanu, R. Calderwood, & C. Zsambok (Eds.), Decision making in action: Models and methods (pp. 3–20). Norwood, CT: Ablex Publishing Corporation. Retrieved from www.books.google.com.
Payne, J. W. (1982). Contingent decision behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 92(2), 382–402. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.92.2.382.
Raiffa, H. (1968). Decision analysis: Introductory lectures on choices under uncertainty. Oxford, England: Addison-Wesley. Retrieved from http://psycnet.apa.org/psycinfo/1968-35027-000.
Reips, U.-D. (2002). Standards for internet-based experimenting. Experimental Psychology, 49(4), 243–256. https://doi.org/10.1026//1618-3169.49.4.243.
Rice, T. K., Schork, N. J., & Rao, D. C. (2008). Methods for handling multiple testing. In D. C. Rao & C. C. Gu (Eds.), Genetic dissection of complex traits (2nd ed., pp. 293–305). San Deigo, CA: Elsevier Inc. Retrieved from www.books.google.co.in.
Schultz, M. T., Mitchell, K. N., Harper, B. K., & Bridges, T. S. (2010). Decision making under uncertainty, (Report No. ERDC TR-10-12). Washington DC: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Retrieved from www.corpsriskanalysisgateway.us.
Todd, P., & Benbasat, I. (1994). The influence of decision aids on choice strategies: An experimental analysis of the role of cognitive effort. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 60(1), 36–74. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1994.1074.
Van Dijk, W. W., Van Der Pligt, J., & Zeelenberg, M. (1999). Effort invested in vain: The impact of effort on the intensity of disappointment and regret. Motivation and Emotion, 23(3), 203–220. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021315314979.
Vlaev, I. (2012). How different are real and hypothetical decisions? Overestimation, contrast and assimilation in social interaction. Journal of Economic Psychology, 33(5), 963–972. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2012.05.005.
Zeelenberg, M., van Dijk, W. W., Manstead, A. S. R., & van de Pligt, J. (2000). On bad decisions and disconfirmed expectancies: The psychology of regret and disappointment. Cognition and Emotion, 14(4), 521–541. https://doi.org/10.1080/026999300402781.
Acknowledgements
We thank Magda Osman for useful comments on earlier versions of this manuscript and Saloni Dixit for earlier assistance.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kalahasthi, R., Bhuptani, P.H. & Kapoor, H. An Analysis of Thoughts, Behaviours, and Emotions in Daily Decision-Making. Psychol Stud 62, 409–420 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12646-017-0430-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12646-017-0430-x