Psychological Studies

, Volume 58, Issue 3, pp 233–241 | Cite as

Cross-Cultural Evaluation of the International Affective Picture System on an Indian Sample

  • Monika Lohani
  • Rashmi Gupta
  • Narayanan Srinivasan
Research in Progress

Abstract

The International Affective Picture System (IAPS) is widely used in emotion and attention research. Currently, there is neither a standard database of affective images for use in research with Indian population nor data on the way people from India respond to emotional pictures in terms of different dimensions. In the present study, we investigated whether self-reported Indian ratings are comparable to the original normative ratings (based on a North American sample) to evaluate its usability in Indian research context. The ratings were obtained from a sample of eighty Indian participants (age range = 18 to 29 years, Mage = 23.7, SD = 2.67, 45 % females) on a stratified representative sample of 100 IAPS pictures. Similar to the normative data collected from the North American sample in the original IAPS database, the ratings were collected across three dimensions – valence (how pleasant/attractive or unpleasant/aversive), arousal (how calm or excited was the intensity of activation), and dominance (how controlling). Our results indicate similarities in valence ratings, but differences in arousal and dominance ratings between the Indian and the North American samples. The relationship between arousal and valence showed a similar (but less curved) boomerang shaped distribution seen with the North American sample. Unlike the North American sample, slopes were higher and intercepts were different for the Indian sample. However, the Indian sample also showed positivity offset and negative bias like the North American sample. These affective ratings show a fair amount of similarity but care is needed especially with arousal values in using these pictures for research with Indian population. While there are subtle differences in the relationship between different affective dimensions, there are also major similarities across cultures in affective judgments.

Keywords

IAPS Emotion rating Arousal Valence Dimension Cross-cultural Indian ratings North American ratings 

References

  1. Bandyopadhyay, D., Pammi, V. S. C., & Srinivasan, N. (2013). Role of affect in decision making. Progress in Brain Research, 202, 37–53.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bradley, M. M. (1994). Emotional memory: A dimensional analysis. In S. M. van Goozen, N. E. Van de Poll, & J. A. Sergeant (Eds.), Emotions: Essays on emotion theory (pp. 97–134). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Google Scholar
  3. Bradley, M. M. (2000). Emotion and motivation. In J. T. Cacioppo & L. G. Tassinary (Eds.), Handbook of psychophysiology (pp. 602–642). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bradley, M. M., & Lang, P. J. (2000). Measuring emotion: Behavior, feeling, and physiology. In R. D. Lane & L. Nadel (Eds.), Cognitive neuroscience of emotion (pp. 242–276). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bradley, M. M., & Lang, P. J. (2007). Emotion and motivation. In J. T. Cacioppo, L. G. Tassinary, & G. G. Berntson (Eds.), Handbook of psychophysiology (3rd ed., pp. 581–607). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bradley, M. M., Codispoti, M., Sabatinelli, D., & Lang, P. J. (2001). Emotion and motivation II: sex differences in picture processing. Emotion, 1, 300–319.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gross, J. J., & Levenson, R. W. (1995). Emotion elicitation using films. Cognition and Emotion, 9, 87–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ito, T. A., Cacioppo, J. T., & Lang, P. J. (1998). Eliciting effect using the international affective picture system: trajectories through evaluative space. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 855–879.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Jenkins, J. M., & Oatley, K. (1996). Emotional episodes and emotionality through the lifespan. In C. Malatesta-Magai & S. McFadden (Eds.), Handbook of emotion, adult development, and aging (pp. 421–441). San Diego: Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Lang, P. J. (1980). Behavioral treatment and bio-behavioral assessment: Computer applications. In J. B. Sidowski, J. H. Johnson, & T. A. Williams (Eds.), Technology in mental health care delivery systems (pp. 119–167). Norwood: Ablex.Google Scholar
  11. Lang, P. J. (1995). The emotion probe: studies of motivation and attention. American Psychologist, 50, 372–385.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lang, P. J., Bradley, M. M., & Cuthbert, B. N. (1997). Motivated attention: Affect, activation and action. In P. J. Lang & R. F. Balaban (Eds.), Attention and orienting: Sensory and motivational processes (pp. 97–134). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  13. Lang, P. J., Bradley, M. M., & Cuthbert, B. N. (1998). Emotion, motivation, and anxiety: brain mechanisms and psychophysiology. Biological Psychiatry, 44, 1248–1263.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lang, P. J., Bradley, M. M., & Cuthbert, B. N. (2005). International affective picture system (IAPS): Affective ratings of pictures and instruction manual (Technical Report A-6). Gainesville, FL: University of Florida.Google Scholar
  15. Lasaitis, C., Ribeiro, R. L., & Bueno, O. F. A. (2008). Brazilian norms for the International Affective Picture System (IAPS)-comparison of the affective ratings for new stimuli between Brazilian and North-American subjects. Journal Brasileiro de Psiquiatria, 57, 270–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lundqvist, D, Flykt, A., & Öhman, A. (1998). The Karolinska Directed Emotional Faces - KDEF, CD ROM from Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Psychology section, Karolinska Institutet, ISBN 91-630-7164-9.Google Scholar
  17. Mauss, I. B., & Butler, E. A. (2010). Cultural context moderates the relationship between emotion control values and cardiovascular challenge versus threat responses. Biological Psychology, 84, 521–530.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mogg, K., McNamara, J., Powys, M., Rawlinson, H., Seiffer, A., & Bradley, B. P. (2000). Selective attention to threat: a test of two cognitive models of anxiety. Cognition and Emotion, 14, 375–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Muller, M. M., Keil, A., Gruber, T., & Elbert, T. (1999). Processing of affective pictures modulates right-hemispheric gamma band EEG activity. Clinical Neuropsychology, 110, 1913–1920.Google Scholar
  20. Northoff, G., Richter, A., Gessner, M., Schlagenhauf, F., Fell, J., Baumgart, F., et al. (2000). Functional dissociation between medial and lateral pefrontal cortical spatiotemporal activation in negative and positive emotion: a combined fMRI/MEG study. Cerebral Cortex, 10, 93–107.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ramirez, I., Hernandez, M. A., Sanchez, M., Fernandez, M. C., Vila, J., Pastor, M. C., et al. (1998). Spanish norms of the international affective picture system. Journal of Psychophysiology, 12, 312–313.Google Scholar
  22. Reiman, E. M., Lane, R. D., Ahern, G. L., Schwartz, G. E., & Davidson, R. J. (2000). Positron emission tomography in the study of emotion, anxiety, and anxiety disorders. In R. D. Lane & L. Nadel (Eds.), Cognitive neuroscience of emotion (pp. 389–406). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Sutherland, G., Newman, B., & Rachman, S. (1982). Experimental investigations of the relations between mood and intrusive unwanted cognitions. The British Journal of Medical Psychology, 55, 127–138.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Verschuere, B., Crombez, G., & Koster, E. (2001). The international affective picture system: a Flemish validation study. Psychologica Belgica, 41, 205–217.Google Scholar
  25. Wagner, H. L. (1990). The spontaneous facial expression of differential positive and negative emotions. Motivation and Emotion, 14, 27–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© National Academy of Psychology (NAOP) India 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Monika Lohani
    • 1
  • Rashmi Gupta
    • 1
  • Narayanan Srinivasan
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre of Behavioural and Cognitive SciencesUniversity of AllahabadAllahabadIndia

Personalised recommendations