Psychological Studies

, Volume 56, Issue 1, pp 125–134 | Cite as

Just Another Face in the Crowd? Distinctiveness Seeking in Sweden and Britain

  • Emma L. Eriksson
  • Maja Becker
  • Vivian L. Vignoles
Research in Progress


Previous literature on the impact of culture on distinctiveness seeking shows diverging predictions and inconclusive results. We propose that this may be partly due to the fact that distinctiveness can be sought on various levels of awareness. We theorize that cultural values will influence explicit, intentional forms of distinctiveness seeking, but will not necessarily moderate the underlying strength of the identity motive for distinctiveness. Participants in the UK and Sweden completed a measure of cultural values and explicit and implicit measures of distinctiveness seeking. National differences were found in two explicit measures of distinctiveness seeking, and these were partially mediated by individual differences in value priorities. However, no difference was found in our implicit measure of the distinctiveness motive. These findings highlight the importance of attending to the multi-faceted and culturally flexible nature of identity motives.


Culture Distinctiveness Identity motives Implicit measures Need for uniqueness 


  1. Breakwell, G. M. (1987). Identity. In H. Beloff & A. Coleman (Eds.), Psychology survey no. 6 (pp. 94–114). Leicester, UK: British Psychological Society.Google Scholar
  2. Brewer, M. B. (1991). The social self: on being the same and different at the same time. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 475–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brewer, M. B., Manzi, J. M., & Shaw, J. S. (1993). In-group identification as a function of depersonalization, distinctiveness, and status. Psychological Science, 4, 88–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Burns, D. J., & Brady, J. (1992). A cross-cultural comparison of the need for uniqueness in Malaysia and the United States. Journal of Social Psychology, 132, 487–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Eriksson, E. L. (2008). Just another face in the crowd: Distinctiveness seeking in Sweden and Britain. Unpublished honors thesis, University of Sussex, UK.Google Scholar
  6. Fiske, A. P., Kitayama, S., Markus, H. R., & Nisbett, R. E. (1998). The cultural matrix of social psychology. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th ed., Vol. 2, pp. 915–981). Boston: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  7. Fromkin, H. L. (1970). Effects of experimentally aroused feelings of indistinctiveness upon valuation of scarce and novel experiences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 16, 521–529.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fromkin, H. L. (1972). Feelings of interpersonal undistinctiveness: an unpleasant affective state. Journal of Experimental Research in Personality, 6, 178–182.Google Scholar
  9. Gheorghiu, M., Vignoles, V. L., & Smith, P. B. (2009). Beyond the United States and Japan: testing Yamagishi’s emancipation theory of trust across 31 nations. Social Psychology Quarterly, 72, 365–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  11. Jetten, J., Postmes, T., & McAuliffe, B. J. (2002). “We’re all individuals”: group norms of individualism and collectivism, levels of identification and identity threat. European Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 189–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Knafo, A., Schwartz, S. H., & Levine, R. V. (2009). Helping strangers is lower in embedded cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 40, 875–879.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lynn, M., & Snyder, C. R. (2002). Uniqueness seeking. In C. R. Snyder & S. J. Lopez (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology (pp. 395–410). London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Markus, H., & Kunda, Z. (1986). Stability and malleability of the self-concept. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 858–866.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Petavratzi, F. (2004). Implicit and explicit distinctiveness motivation and romantic partner preferences. Unpublished honors thesis, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK.Google Scholar
  16. Pickett, C. L., Silver, M. D., & Brewer, M. B. (2002). The impact of assimilation and differentiation needs on perceived group importance and perceptions of ingroup size. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 546–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Salvatore, J., & Prentice, D. A. (in press). The independence paradox. In J. Jetten & M. J. Hornsey (Eds.), Rebels in groups: Dissent, deviance, difference and defiance. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  18. Sandemose, A. (1933). En flykting krysser sitt spor [A refugee crosses his track]. Oslo: Tidens Norsk Forlag.Google Scholar
  19. Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: theory and empirical tests in 20 countries. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 1–65). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  20. Schwartz, S. H. (2004). Mapping and interpreting cultural differences around the world. In H. Vinken, J. Soeters, & P. Ester (Eds.), Comparing cultures: Dimensions of culture in a comparative perspective (pp. 43–73). Boston: Brill.Google Scholar
  21. Schwartz, S. H. (2007). Value orientations: measurement, antecedents and consequences across nations. In R. Jowell, C. Roberts, R. Fitzgerald, & G. Eva (Eds.), Measuring attitudes cross-nationally: Lessons from the European Social Survey (pp. 161–193). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  22. Schwartz, S. H., & Rubel, T. (2005). Sex differences in value priorities: cross-cultural and multimethod studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 1010–1028.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Seuss, D. (1959). Happy birthday to you! New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  24. Snyder, C. R., & Endelman, J. R. (1979). Effects of degree of interpersonal similarity on physical distance and self-reported attraction: a comparison of uniqueness and reinforcement theory predictions. Journal of Personality, 47, 492–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Snyder, C. R., & Fromkin, H. L. (1980). Uniqueness: the human pursuit of difference. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  26. Tafarodi, R. W., Marshall, T. C., & Katsura, H. (2004). Standing out in Canada and Japan. Journal of Personality, 72, 785–814.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Triandis, H. C. (1994). Culture and social behavior. London: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  28. Triandis, H. C. (1995). Individualism and collectivism. Boulder: Westview.Google Scholar
  29. United Nations Development Programme (2009). Human development report 2009—HDI rankings. Retrieved 20th December, 2009, from the UNDP website:
  30. Vaughan, M. & Vignoles, V. L. (2007). A self-report measure of distinctive appearance. Unpublished raw data, University of Sussex.Google Scholar
  31. Vignoles, V. L. (2009). The motive for distinctiveness: a universal, but flexible human need. In C. R. Snyder & S. Lopez (Eds.), Oxford handbook of positive psychology (2nd ed., pp. 491–499). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Vignoles, V. L., Chryssochoou, X., & Breakwell, G. M. (2000). The distinctiveness principle: identity, meaning and the bounds of cultural relativity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4, 337–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Vignoles, V. L., Chryssochoou, X., & Breakwell, G. (2002a). Evaluating models of identity motivation: self-esteem is not the whole story. Self and Identity, 1, 201–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Vignoles, V. L., Chryssochoou, X., & Breakwell, G. M. (2002b). Sources of distinctiveness: position, difference and separateness in the identities of Anglican parish priests. European Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 761–780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Vignoles, V. L., & Moncaster, N. (2007). Identity motives and in-group favouritism: a new approach to individual differences in intergroup discrimination. British Journal of Social Psychology, 46, 91–113.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Vignoles, V. L., Regalia, C., Manzi, C., Golledge, J., & Scabini, E. (2006). Beyond self-esteem: influence of multiple motives on identity construction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 308–333.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. World Bank (2009). Gross national income per capita 2008, Atlas method and PPP. Retrieved 20th December, 2009, from the World Bank website:
  38. Yamaguchi, S., Kuhlman, D. M., & Sugimori, S. (1995). Personality correlates of allocentric tendencies in individualist and collectivist cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 26, 658–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© National Academy of Psychology (NAOP) India 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Emma L. Eriksson
    • 1
  • Maja Becker
    • 1
  • Vivian L. Vignoles
    • 1
  1. 1.School of PsychologyUniversity of SussexBrightonUK

Personalised recommendations