Empirical validation of values in action-inventory of strengths (VIA-IS) in Indian context
This study uses self-report measures completed by one hundred and twenty three (123) undergraduate technology students to investigate the validity of Peterson and Seligman’s (2004) classification system of 24 character strengths embodied in six core virtues. Using exploratory factor analyses we found, that an exact convergence of the character strengths was explicitly absent with the six-virtues. In our study, a five-factor solution was more comprehensive and well representing the resultant factor loadings upon analyzing the data which is further compared to a similar empirical study available for analyzing structural dynamics. In this paper, we have discussed the five-factor solution and renamed the dimensions to show a legitimate picture of the classification system, which requires further justification, and in addition, advocates reanalysis and reinterpretation of the originally propounded values in action (VIA) classification as a recommendation for future research.
KeywordsPositive psychology Character strengths Virtues Self-report measure
- American Psychiatric Association (1994). Diagnostic and statisti-cal manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
- Csikszentmihalyi M, & Csikszentmihalyi IS (2006). A life worth living: Contributions to positive psychology. Oxford Univer-sity Press Inc.Google Scholar
- Peterson C & Seligman MEP (2004). Character strengths and virtues: A handbook and classification. DC: American Psycho-logical Association. New York: Washington, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Seligman M (2002). Authentic happiness. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
- Singh K & Choubisa R (2009). Psychometric properties of Hindi translated version of values in action inventory of strengths. Journal of Indian Health Psychology, 4(1):65–76.Google Scholar