Journal of Parasitic Diseases

, Volume 43, Issue 2, pp 289–293 | Cite as

Efficacy of closantel, fenbendazole and ivermectin against GI helminths of cattle in central Kashmir

  • M. Bushra
  • R. A. Shahardar
  • I. M. AllaieEmail author
  • Z. A. Wani
Original Article


Three trials were conducted to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of closantel (@ 7.5 mg/kg body weight, orally), fenbendazole (@ 7.5 mg/kg body weight, orally) and ivermectin bolus (@ 0.2 mg/kg body weight, orally) against gastrointestinal (GI) helminth parasites of cattle in central zone of Kashmir valley. Twenty cattle suffering from GI helminth infection were randomly selected and divided into two groups in each trial. In each trial, one group comprising of fifteen animals were treated with anthelmintic and second group comprising of five animals were kept as infected untreated control. To determine the therapeutic efficacy of different anthelmintic drugs against GI helminths, faecal samples were directly collected from rectum before treatment and on 7th, 14th and 28th day post treatment and eggs per gram of faeces was determined by using Stoll’s method. Then the efficacy of different anthelmintics was calculated by employing Faecal Egg Count Reduction Test. On 14th day post treatment closantel was found to be 100 and 94.44% effective against Fasciola spp. and strongyle worms, respectively, however, it was not found effective against Trichuris spp. The efficacy of fenbendazole was 100% against Fasciola spp., paramphistomes, Moniezia spp., Trichuris spp. and strongyle worms on 14th day post treatment. Ivermectin was found to be 100% effective against Trichuris spp. and strongyle worms on 14th day post treatment, however, it was not effective against Fasciola spp. and paramphistomes.


Closantel Efficacy Fenbendazole Ivermectin Gastrointestinal helminths Cattle 



The authors are thankful to staff members especially Mr. Mohd. Amin Wani, Division of Veterinary Parasitology, FVSc and AH SKUAST-K, Shuhama, Alusteng for providing all the necessary and timely help in carrying out the work. The funds for this research were met from Divisional ROC provided by SKUAST-K.

Author contributions

BM executed the research work in the field; RAS designed the technical programme of the research work; IMA assisted in data analysis and writing of the manuscript; ZAW assisted at field level during execution of the research work.

Compliance with ethical standard

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflicts of interest.

Human and animal rights

The authors declare that the study was conducted on naturally infected animals in the field. As no experimental infection was established during this research work, so there was no need to take the approval for execution of the work from animal ethics committee. The animals belonged to the local farmers of the central Kashmir and they had given full consent for this research work.


  1. Aiman (2014) Prevalence and therapeutic studies on gastrointestinal helminth parasites of cattle in North zone of Kashmir valley. M. V. Sc thesis submitted to Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Kashmir, ShalimarGoogle Scholar
  2. Bagherwal RK (1992) Efficacy of fenbendazole against helminth of dairy buffaloes and calves. Livestock Adviser 17:18–20Google Scholar
  3. Blagburn BL, Hanrahan LA, Hendrix CM, Lindsay DS (1987) Efficacy of fenbendazole-medicated feed blocks against gastrointestinal nematode infections in calves. Am J Vet Res 48:1017–1019PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Chandra S, Prasad A, Latchumikanthan A, Rakesh RL, Praveen K, Khobra V, Subramani KV, Misri J, Sankar M (2015) Status of benzimidazole resistance in Haemonchus contortus of goats from different geographic regions of Uttar Pradesh, India. Vet Parasitol 208:263–267CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Dash KM, Hall HE, Barger LA (1988) The role of arithmetic and geometric mean worm egg counts in faecal egg count reduction tests and in monitoring strategic drenching programme in sheep. Aust Vet J 65:66–67CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Gill BS (1996) Anthelmintic resistance in India. Vet Parasitol 63:173–176CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Gill BS, Singh J, Gill BS, Singh A, Khehra SS, Rai A, Hussain O (1989) Efficacy of ivermectin against mange and gastrointestinal nematodes of buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis). Vet Parasitol 31:141–147CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Ibarra-Velarde F, Cristino NM, Vera-Montenegro Y, Bocanegra RC, Campos AH, Galvan PO (2002) Comparative efficacy of experimental fasciolicide, triclabendazole and closantel in cattle naturally infected with Fasciola hepatica. Vet Mexico 33:237–245Google Scholar
  9. Irshad (2015) Prevalence and therapeutic studies on gastrointestinal helminth parasites of cattle in South zone of Kashmir valley. M. V. Sc thesis submitted to Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Kashmir, ShalimarGoogle Scholar
  10. Jaiswal AK, Sudan V, Shanker D, Kumar P (2013) Emergence of Ivermectin resistance in gastrointestinal nematodes of goats in a semi-organised farm of Mathura district-India. Vet Archive 83:275–280Google Scholar
  11. Kumar A, Prasad KD, Kumar RR (2004) Efficacy of ivermectin and tetramisole control packages against gastrointestinal nematodosis in cattle and buffaloes. J Vet Parasitol 18:31–33Google Scholar
  12. Malone JB, Williams JC, Lutz M, Fagan N, Jacocks M, Jones E, Marbury K, Willis E (1990) Efficacy of concomitant early summer treatment with fenbendazole and clorsulon against Fasciola hepatica and gastrointestinal nematodes in calves in Louisiana. Am J Vet Res 51:133–136PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Manfredi MT, Rocco M, Rosa M, Bossi P, Traldi G, Genchi C (1988) Efficacy of ivermectin as atopical formulation in the treatment of endoparasites and ectoparasites of feedlot cattle. Obiettivi e Documenti Veterinari 9:53–55Google Scholar
  14. Mehlhorn H (2001) Encyclopedic reference of parasitology, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin, HeidelbergCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Mendoza-de-Gives P, Lopez Arellano ME, Ramblas Angeles JA, Najera Fuentes RA, Herrera Rodriguez D, Mejia Garcia RA (1986) Anthelmintic efficacy of ivermectin against gastrointestinal nematodes in cattle. Tecnica Pecuaria en Mexico 51:28–36Google Scholar
  16. Miller JE, Morrison DG (1992) Effect of fenbendazole and ivermectin on development of strongylate nematode eggs and larvae in calf faeces. Vet Parasitol 43:265–270CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Perry BD, Randolph TF (1999) Improving the assessment of the economic impact of parasitic diseases and of their control in production animals. Vet Parasitol 84:145–168CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Rajkhowa S, Bujarbaruah KM, Thong K, Rajkhowa C (2003) Comparative efficacy of ivermectin, levamisole and albendazole against naturally acquired nematodiasis of mithun. Ind Vet J 80:854–856Google Scholar
  19. Rehbein S, Pitt SR, Langholff WK, Barth D, Eagleson JS (1997) Therapeutic and prophylactic efficacy of the Ivomec SR Bolus against nematodes and Psoroptes ovis in cattle weighing more than 300 kg at the time of treatment. Parasitol Res 83:722–726CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Sahoo N, Mohanty TN, Sambal S (2002) Prevalence of gastrointestinal helminthic infection among grazing and stall-fed cattle in rainfed district of Orissa. J Vet Parasitol 16:61–62Google Scholar
  21. Sahoo N, Mohanty TN, Ray TK, Rao SV, Mallick B (2003) Effect of fenbendazole on milk production in gastro-intestinal nematode infected indigenous cows. Ind Vet J 80:570–571Google Scholar
  22. Sarkar AK, Ali M, Rahman A (2005) Efficacy of ivermectin against gastrointestinal nematodes in calves. J Anim Vet Adv 4:329–331Google Scholar
  23. Shin-Sung S, Lee-Chung G, Cho-Shinn H, Kim-Jong T, Wee-Sung H, Shin S (1995) Efficacy of closantel for the treatment of naturally acquired and experimentally induced Fasciola hepatica infections in cattle. K J Vet Res 35:347–352Google Scholar
  24. Soulsby EJL (1982) Helminths, arthopods and protozoa of domesticated animals, 7th edn. ELBS and Baillere Tindal, London, p 809Google Scholar
  25. Sutherland IA, Leathwick DM (2011) Anthelmintic resistance in nematode parasites of cattle. A global issue? Trends Parasitol 27:176–181CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Vera-Montenegro Y, Ibarra Velarde F, Quiroz Romero H, Hernandez Campos A, Castillo R (2003) Field trial on the efficacy of an experimental fasciolicide compared with some commercial compounds in naturally infected cattle. Parasitol Res 91:1–4CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Williams JC (1991) Efficacy of albendazole, levamisole and fenbendazole against gastrointestinal nematodes of cattle, with emphasis on inhibited early fourth stage Ostertagia ostertagi larvae. Vet Parasitol 40:59–71CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Yazwinski TA, Featherston H, Tucker C (1995) Effectiveness of the ivermectin sustained-release bolus in the control of bovine nematodosis. Am J Vet Res 56:1599–1602PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Society for Parasitology 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of Veterinary Parasitology, F.V.Sc. & A.H.SKUAST-KSrinagarIndia
  2. 2.Sheep Husbandry DepartmentSrinagarIndia

Personalised recommendations