Advertisement

Journal of Parasitic Diseases

, Volume 40, Issue 3, pp 1009–1013 | Cite as

Histopathological and bacterial study of skin and gill of grass carp, Ceteopharyngodon idella, (Valenciennes 1844) exposed to copper sulfate and potassium permanganate

  • Fatemeh Jooyandeh
  • Ali Sadeghpour
  • Hossein Khara
  • Zabihollah Pajand
Original Article
  • 71 Downloads

Abstract

The gill histology and bacterial load of skin of the grass carp juveniles were investigated in relation to various concentrations of copper sulfate and potassium permanganate. For this purpose, the sublethal doses were determined after a pre-test and then the experiment was done in five treatments (for copper sulfate: 1, 1.94, 3.71, 7.07 and 15 mg/l and for potassium permanganate: 0.25, 0.52, 1.91, 2.27 and 5 mg/l) with three replicates inside the glass aquaria. Also, one group without disinfecting product was considered as control for each experiment. The microbial and histopathological investigations were done after 96 h exposure. According to results, the lowest bacterial load (CFU/g) of skin was observed in 15 mg/l copper sulfate treatment and 0.25 mg/l potassium permanganate treatment (P < 0.05). Also, the histological investigation showed a range of histopathological alternations in gills tissue including lamellar necrosis, hyperplasia, lamellar adhesion, haemorrhage, clubbing of gill lamellae. The severity of these alternations increased with increasing of the doses of the copper sulfate and potassium permanganate. In this regard, the highest histological damages were observed in 15 mg/l copper sulfate and 5 mg/l potassium permanganate respectively. Our results showed that low dosage of potassium permanganate has best effect on reducing of bacterial load of skin with lowest adverse effects on gill tissue.

Keywords

Copper sulfate Potassium permanganate Histology Gill Grass carp 

References

  1. Ampofo JA, Clerk GC (2010) Diversity of bacteria contaminants in tissues of fish cultured in organic waste-fertilized ponds: health implications. Open Fish Sci J 3:142–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Boyd CE, Massut L (1999) Risks associated with the use of chemicals in pond aquaculture. Aquac Eng 20:113–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Carvalho CS, Fernandes MN (2006) Effect of temperature on copper toxicity and hematological responses in the neotropical fish Prochilodus scrofa at low and high pH. Aquaculture 251:109–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Erickson RJ, Benoit DA, Mattson VR, Nelson HP, Leonard AN (1996) The effect of water chemistry on the toxicity of copper to fatheadminnows. Environ Toxicol Chem 15:181–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Erondu ES, Anyanwu PE (2005) Potential hazards and risks associated with the aquaculture industry. Afr J Biotechnol 4:1622–1627Google Scholar
  6. Faruk MAR, Sultana N, Kabir MB (2005) Use of chemicals in aquaculture activities in Mymensingh area, Bangladesh. Bangladesh J Fish 29:1–10Google Scholar
  7. Hasan MR, Ahmed GU (2002) Issues in carp hatcheries and nurseries in Bangladesh, with special reference to health management. In: Arthur JR, Phillips MJ, Subasinghe RP, Reantaso MB, MacRae IH (eds) Primary aquatic animal health care in rural, small-scale, aquaculture development. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper No. 406Google Scholar
  8. Hawkins WE, Overstreet RM, Provancha MJ (1984) Effects of space shuttle exhaust plumes on gills of some estuarine fishes: a light and electron microscopic study. Gulf Res Rep 7:297–309Google Scholar
  9. Mitchell AJ, Darwish AM, Fuller SA (2008) Comparison of tank treatments of copper sulfate and potassium permanganate on sunshine bass infested with ichthyobodosis (costiosis) [abstract]. Book of Abstracts Aquaculture America, p 246Google Scholar
  10. Nash CE (2003) Interactions of Atlantic salmon in the Pacific northwest VI. A synopsis of the risk and uncertainty. Fish Res 62:339–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Palmer CM (1962) Algae in water supplies, U. S. Public Health Service, Publication No. 657, 88 ppGoogle Scholar
  12. Peres I, Pihan JC (1991) Copper LC50 to Cyprinus carpio. Influence of hardness, seasonal variation, proposition of maximum acceptable toxicant concentration. Environ Technol 12:161–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Peyghan R, Oskoizadeh K, Emailzadeh S, Rasekh A (2007) Pathological study of effect of short and long-term copper sulfate bath on gill in grass carp, Ctenopharyngodon idella. Asian Fish Sci 20:109–116Google Scholar
  14. Phillips M (1996) The use of chemicals in carp and shrimp aquaculture in Bangladesh, Cambodia, Lao PDR, Nepal, Pakistan, Sri Lanka and Viet Nam. In: Arthur JR, Lavilla-Pitogo CR, Subasinghe RP (eds) Use of chemicals in aquaculture in Asia. Southeast Asian Fisheries Development Center, Aquaculture Department Tigbauan, Iloilo, pp 75–84Google Scholar
  15. Plumb JA (1992) Disease control in aquaculture. In: Shariff IM, Subasinghe RP, Arthur JR (eds) Disease in Asian aquaculture. Fish Health Section of the Asian Fisheries Society, Manila, pp 3–17Google Scholar
  16. Straus DL (2004) Comparison of the acute toxicity of potassium permanganate to hybrid striped bass in well water and diluted well water. J World Aquacult Soc 35:55–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Straus DL, Tucker CS (1993) Acute toxicity of copper sulphate andchelated copper to channel catfish Ictalurus punctatus. J World Aquac Soc 24:390–395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Torgersen Y, Hastein T (1995) Disinfection in aquaculture. Rev Sci Tech Off Int Epiz 14:419–434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Tucker CS, Robinson EH (1990) Channel catfish farming handbook. Van Nostrand-Reinhold, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Society for Parasitology 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fatemeh Jooyandeh
    • 1
  • Ali Sadeghpour
    • 1
  • Hossein Khara
    • 1
  • Zabihollah Pajand
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Fishery, College of Natural Resources, Lahijan BranchIslamic Azad UniversityLahijanIran
  2. 2.The International Research Institute of SturgeonRashtIran

Personalised recommendations