Journal of Parasitic Diseases

, Volume 40, Issue 3, pp 910–913 | Cite as

2D-PAGE analysis of the soluble proteins of the tropical liver fluke, Fasciola gigantica and biliary amphistome, Gigantocotyle explanatum, concurrently infecting Bubalus bubalis

  • Yasir A. Khan
  • Mohd Abdul Hannan Khan
  • S. M. A. AbidiEmail author
Original Article


The digenetic trematodes, Fasciola gigantica and Gigantocotyle explanatum, belonging to the family Fasciolidae and Paramphistomidae respectively, have been often found to concurrently infect the liver of Indian water buffalo Bubalus bubalis, causing serious pathological damage to the vital organ, incurring huge economic losses. In the present study the soluble gene products of both F. gigantica and G. explanatum were analyzed by 2 dimensional polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. The soluble proteomic profile revealed considerable similarity as well as differences in the size, distribution pattern, total number, the isoelectric point (pI) and molecular weight (Mr) of the resolved polypeptide spots. The maximum number of polypeptide spots with a molecular weight range of >10 to 160 kDa were recorded with a pI range of 7–9 followed by pI range of 5–7, 9–10 and 3–5 in both the parasites. However, considerable variation was recorded in the Mr of the polypeptides belonging to each pI range. The genetic heterogeneity could be an obvious contributing factor for such differences but some polypeptides appeared to be conserved in the two species. The molecular similarities and the habitat preference by these worms may be a consequence of microenvironmental cues that guide these flukes to reach their habitat through different routes and establish a successful host-parasite relationship.


Digenetic trematodes 2D PAGE Concurrent infection Bubalus bubalis 



Authors are grateful to the Chairman, Department of Zoology, Aligarh Muslim University for providing the necessary facilities. Thanks are extended to University Grants Commission, New Delhi for financial assistance to YAK. Financial support under the BBSRC UK CIDLID project to SMAA and fellowship to MAHK is also gratefully acknowledged.


  1. Alam SM, Nizami WA (1988) Protein polymorphism of some amphistomes and their host tissue. Acta Vet Hung 36:247–250PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Ambu SA (1978) Survey of amphistomes of cattle and buffaloes at the Shah Alam Abattoir, Selangor, Malaysia. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health 9:443–444PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Anon (2011–2012) Annual report—Department of Animal Husbandry, Dairying and Fisheries, Ministry of Agriculture, Government of India, pp 1–112 (Gives data on both Fasiolosis and amphistomosis)Google Scholar
  4. Blum H, Beier H, Gross HJ (1987) Improved silver staining of plant proteins, RNA and DNA in polyacrylamide gels. Electrophoresis 8:93–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dalton J, Heffernan M (1989) Thiol proteases released in vitro by Fasciola hepatica. Mol Biochem Parasitol 35:161–166CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Garg R, Yadev CL, Kumar RR, Banerjee PS, Vatsys S, Godara R (2009) The epidemiology of fasciolosis in ruminants in different geo-climatic regions of north India. Trop Anim Health Prod 41:1695–1700CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Hamed MA (2006) Excretory products of Fasciola hepatica worms protects against Schistosoma mansoni infection in mice. Indian J Exp Biol 44:554–561PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Hopkins DR (1992) Homing in on helminths. Am J Trop Med Hyg 46:626–634CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Khan P, Nizami WA, Ahmad M, Abidi SMA (1990) Biochemical variations in Gigantocotyle explanatum and Gastrothylax crumenifer with respect to their seasonal reproduction. Int J Parasitol 20:109–117CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Morphew RM, Wright HA, LaCourse EM, Porter J, Barrett J, Woods DJ, Brophy PM (2011) Towards delineating functions within the Fasciola secreted cathepsin l protease family by integrating in vivo based sub proteomic phylogenetics. PLoS Neg Trop Dis 5(1):1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Nizami WA, Khan P, Abidi SMA (1991) Problems and prospects of buffalo amphistomosis. Parasit Hung 24:69–79Google Scholar
  12. Osikovski E, Kamburov P, Vasilev I (1978) Comparative electrophoretic study of the water-soluble proteins of some representative of genus Paraamphistomum. Khelminthologiye Sofia 6:68–74Google Scholar
  13. Rim HJ, Farag HF, Sornmani S, Cross JH (1994) Food-borne trematodes: ignored or emerging? Parasitol Today 10:207–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Saifullah MK, Abidi SMA, Nizami WA (2001) Polypeptide profile of in vitro released eggs of some digenetic trematodes. J Vet Parasit 15(1):25–28Google Scholar
  15. Simpson AJG (1986) The influence of molecular heterogeneity in helminth identification, protective immunity and Immunodiagnosis. In: Parasitology-Quo Vadit? Proceedings of the sixth int cong parasitol, Brisbane, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  16. Smith AM, Dowd AJ, Heffernan M, Robertson CD, Dalton JP (1993) Fasciola hepatica: a secreted cathepsin L-like proteinase cleaves host immunoglobulin. Int J Parasitol 23:977–983CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Spector T (1978) Refinement of Coommassie blue method of protein quantitation. Anal Biochem 86:142–146CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Standen OD (1995) The effect of temperature, light and salinity upon hatching of the ova of Schistosoma mansoni. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 45:225–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Society for Parasitology 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yasir A. Khan
    • 1
  • Mohd Abdul Hannan Khan
    • 1
  • S. M. A. Abidi
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Section of Parasitology, Department of ZoologyAligarh Muslim UniversityAligarhIndia

Personalised recommendations